From Downsize DC <[email protected]>
Subject Rand Paul and the Read the Bills Act
Date December 29, 2022 3:14 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
This approach could fight big spending

View this email in your browser ([link removed])


** Rand Paul uses Read the Bills to fight big spending
------------------------------------------------------------

Rand Paul has repeatedly introduced our Read the Bills Act in the Senate. He has also introduced the One Subject at a Time Act and the Write the Laws Act.

This month, he also invoked "bill reading" to fight big spending, as represented by the…
* 4,155 page, $1.7 trillion spending bill
* Passed (in the House) in the dead of night
* Mostly by proxy votes!

No one read the bill. Congress did not debate the bill.

Many members were not even present when the votes were cast. They placed their absentee votes before the final version of the bill was even available.

No one who voted for the bill could have any idea whether the bill was good or bad, or even what was in it.


** The Read the Bills Act would have prevented this travesty.
------------------------------------------------------------

Let's go a step further. What would taxpayers think of the individual spending plans in this monstrous legislation? Surely a majority would have supported some but opposed many. The same is likely for the members of Congress. Some proposals could have gotten a majority vote, but many or most would have been rejected.

Sadly, no one ever got a chance to support or oppose each individual spending proposal. Only the package as a whole was presented for a vote. But guess what?

Our One Subject at a Time Act, which has also been introduced by Rand Paul, would have prevented the clustering of unrelated spending proposals. That means…


** We have two ways to fight big spending bills like this!
------------------------------------------------------------

1. The Read the Bills would compel bills to be short enough for members of Congress to actually read them.
2. The One Subject at a Time Act would prevent unrelated measures from being clustered together.

Think what these two reforms would have meant in this case. There is simply no way Congress could have committed to spending $1.7 trillion in borrowed money with just one vote. Indeed...

It's possible that Read the Bills and One Subject at a Time could bring about a balanced budget all by themselves, with no need for fancy sequestering schemes or a so-called balanced budget amendment.

AMAZING!

If you're not yet one of The 300 ([link removed]) in your district who will commit to attend meetings in local congressional offices to gain new sponsors for Read the Bills, then please take a moment to join up. It costs nothing, and no meetings will occur ([link removed]) until we have all 300 people in your district.
Pass Read the Bills ([link removed])

Set your own agenda,

Jim Babka, President
Agenda Setters by Downsize DC

============================================================

** Today's Action: Fight big spending with the Read the Bills Act! ([link removed])
Every issue of this newsletter appears on the blog too - sometimes with a modified title. That blog post also gets shared on the Downsize DC Facebook page. Facebook will expose that post to more people if you leave a reaction (Like), a comment, or (especially if you) Share it.
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2022 DownsizeDC.org, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in at our website

Our mailing address is:
DownsizeDC.org
872 Mark Drive
Akron, OH 44313
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis

  • Sender: Downsize DC
  • Political Party: n/a
  • Country: United States
  • State/Locality: n/a
  • Office: n/a
  • Email Providers:
    • MailChimp