Strategic Case Could be Used to Reconsider Legalized Abortion in America
(Christian Broadcasting Network) Catherine Glenn Foster explained, "There's this exemption for abortion. For anyone who's performing an abortion, all of a sudden the same rules don't apply. And really it is a situation where you have an abortion business fighting for the right to abandon their patients." The AUL leader continued, "They shouldn't be able to just forget about that woman as soon as she walks out from their door. They should ensure that she gets the emergency care that she needs and the treatment that she needs after that abortion has gone wrong."
Hadley Arkes on culture, politics, and the role of the law as a teacher
(Life, Liberty, and Law) Does culture shape politics? Or does politics shape culture? Hadley Arkes, author, professor, and political scientist, joins Tom Shakely and Noah Brandt of Americans United for Life to consider these questions and speak on natural law, the moral foundations of law, the role of the U.S. Supreme Court, and more. Hadley has long been at the forefront of cultural, political, and life issues as professor emeritus at Amherst College and founder and director of the James Wilson Institute on Natural Rights and the American Founding, and he continues to advance life-affirming law and policy in Washington, DC.
Republicans Are Forging a Strong Case Against Roe v. Wade
(Bloomberg) The court’s wobbliness isn’t an accident. It’s a direct result of the lack of constitutional grounding for its decades of abortion decisions. The Constitution offers no guidance on whether or not a restriction on abortion is “undue.” That’s a subjective question, and the answer to it depends a great deal on how much value the life of a fetus has — which is to say, it’s inextricable from the question of the morality of abortion. The justices neither have nor claim any special knowledge about that underlying question. That’s why they ought to exit the field altogether, and leave abortion policy to legislators and voters.
|