Where things stand: On Aug. 1, President Biden announced that he was “ready to expeditiously negotiate a new arms control framework to replace New START when it expires in 2026. But negotiation requires a willing partner operating in good faith."
At the time, Putin said, “Russia is open to dialogue on ensuring strategic stability … and improving the situation in arms control.” But on Aug. 8, Russia announced that it would not allow the resumption of U.S. inspections in Russia under New START due to the impact of U.S. travel and visa restrictions on Russian inspections. The United States has said talks on a follow-on agreement cannot begin until New START inspections resume.
The two sides agreed to meet Nov. 28 to resolve the issues, but at the 11th hour, Russia announced it would not attend, claiming that it is “impossible to discuss strategic stability” against the background of the situation in Ukraine.
Arms Control Association board member Laura Kennedy told The Washington Post that Russia’s decision to thwart the meeting is “irresponsible, especially at this time of heightened tensions when dialogue between the world’s two largest nuclear powers is paramount.”
Later, other Russian officials claimed that Russia had not “canceled” but “postponed” the New START meeting until sometime next year, and that Russia is interested in negotiating a new nuclear arms control agreement before 2026, but Washington must take the first step.
When talks resume, the two sides will need to pursue practical solutions to resolve the substantive issues on the bilateral nuclear arms control agenda. At a minimum, the two presidents could issue unilateral reciprocal commitments to respect the central limits of New START until such time as new agreements are concluded.