Could this be the case that turns everything around?!

[ACT For America]
[[link removed]]


[FB]
[[link removed]]
[TW]
[[link removed]]
[IN]
[[link removed]]
[LI]
[[link removed]]
[YT]
[[link removed]]
[RU]
[[link removed]]
[CO]
[[link removed]]

KARI LAKE FILES LAWSUIT LOADED WITH EVIDENCE CONTESTING ELECTION
RESULTS

Arizona Sun Times |Rachel Alexander | December 10, 2022 

[Kari Lake]

Two weeks after filing a complaint
[[link removed]] requesting
data from the 2022 midterm election in Maricopa County, gubernatorial
candidate Kari Lake has filed another lawsuit against election
officials contesting the election results, alleging voter
disenfranchisement and suppression. Lake called for a forensic audit
of the printer-tabulator problems, an inspection of ballots and voter
registration records, including signatures, disqualification of
illegal votes, and redoing the election as well as other relief. Read
the Lawsuit Here>>
[[link removed]]

Kurt Olsen, one of the attorneys who filed the lawsuit, told The
Arizona Sun Times he believes the election anomalies were
“intentional since they didn’t test all of their equipment and
follow the appropriate processes when problems arose.” He asked,
“WHY HAVEN’T THEY DONE THEIR OWN FORENSIC AUDIT 30 DAYS LATER?”

ARIZONA STATE: CLICK BELOW TO ACT NOW!

[Decertify 2022 Midterms]
[[link removed]]


[ACT NOW. Click Here]
[[link removed]]


He said Maricopa County officials’ cavalier attitude about the
problems and their lack of trying to find out what happened is
telling. “Does anybody believe this widespread failure, oh shucks,
just happened?” he wondered.

The complaint alleged that the number of illegal votes cast in the
election “far exceeds the 17,117 vote margin” between the two
candidates, a difference of .67 percent. It said Democrat Katie Hobbs
did not receive the highest number of votes due to illegal votes.

Clay Parikh, a cyber expert who has extensive experience performing
security tests on voting systems, including the type used in Maricopa
County, stated that due to the lack of certification of some of the
voting systems, the numerous procedural violations, the widespread
failure of the tabulation process, the failure to provide proper
instructions to handle the problem after it started, and the incorrect
explanations given to the public, the election failures “can only be
described as intentional.”

The complaint alleged that “tens of thousands of mail-in and drop
box ballots” did not satisfy signature requirements. Three Maricopa
County signature verification employees signed affidavits stating that
they rejected signatures as mismatching up to 40 percent of the time.
However, when they showed up for work the next day, they would see
only about 10 percent of those ballots reappear for signature curing.
One of the reviewers believes a manager was approving the mismatched
ballots instead.

The complaint cited a previous report
[[link removed]] by
Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich, which found that the early
ballot signature verification used by Maricopa County “may be
insufficient to guard against abuse.” An analysis
[[link removed]] found
that bad signatures were rejected 14 times more often during the
August primary Election in Maricopa County than during the 2020
General Election.

The lawsuit alleged that between 15,603 and 29,257 Republicans were
disenfranchised who would have voted for Lake, according to a
calculation performed by data analyst Richard Baris of Big Data Poll
who surveyed voters about whether they experienced problems on
Election Day. Due to the extremely high
[[link removed]] numbers
of Republicans voting in person on election day, those votes were
expected to fall 70 percent to Lake, 30 percent to Hobbs.

The complaint stated that 132 of the county’s 223 vote centers, or
59 percent, were affected, far more than the 70 acknowledged by county
officials. It went over county election officials minimizing the
problem, refusing to acknowledge the full extent of it, such as the
long lines or how long it continued into the day, and provided
affidavits from voters regarding how long they waited in line. It
cited testimony regarding numerous voters who left without voting. The
lawsuit also cited commingling the misread ballots, known as “Door
3” ballots, with tabulated ballots.

The complaint stated that “hundreds of thousands” of mail-in
ballots lacked a chain of custody. It said over 298,942 ballots
delivered to third-party signature verification service Runbeck on
Election Day lacked a chain of custody, a class 2 misdemeanor
[[link removed]].
A Runbeck employee and other observers provided affidavits regarding
witnessing this. The Runbeck employee also stated there were at least
9,530 duplicate ballots printed and issued with no chain of custody.
Two days after the election, 25,000 more ballots were found which
lacked a chain of custody.

The lawsuit cited an investigation into the 2020 election conducted by
We the People AZ Alliance (WPAA), which found many incidents where
Arizonans discovered they had been registered to vote or their voter
registration had been changed, unbeknownst to them. WPAA reviewed
12.12 percent of the signatures on ballot envelopes in the Maricopa
County 2020 election and found that 18,022 were clearly mismatches,
and 19,631 failed the Arizona Secretary of State’s standards. This
translated to 156,000 likely mismatches countywide and 165,600 failing
the standards, yet the county only rejected 587 ballots for mismatched
signatures. WPAA discovered that thousands of those same voters voted
again in the 2022 election.

The complaint cited free speech violations, pointing to an
information-sharing program that Hobbs, Maricopa County Election
officials and Richer participated in to provide information to the
Election Misinformation Reporting Portal created by the Department of
Homeland Security and the Cybersecurity and Information Security
Agency. It showed how Hobbs and other officials got election
information censored on Twitter and other social media platforms.

The complaint cited a recent Rasmussen Reports poll
[[link removed]] which
found that 72 percent of voters don’t trust Arizona’s election
results.

Olsen told The Sun Times that although it’s impossible to trace
back the ballots to the voters at this stage, it’s not required by
the law to show that the unlawful votes would have gone to a
particular candidate.

Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson has been assigned
to the case. The exhibits to the lawsuit will be available soon
at SaveArizonaFund.com
[[link removed]],
Lake’s team said.

If the inauguration of Hobbs takes place, a court can still change the
results, as took place
[[link removed]] in
1916 in a disputed gubernatorial election. Abe Hamadeh, the Republican
candidate for Attorney General who trailed his opponent Kris Mayes by
511 votes, filed
[[link removed]] a
lawsuit on Friday, as did Mark Finchem, the Republican candidate for
Secretary of State who trailed his opponent Adrian Fontes by 120,208
votes.

[Ban all Voting Machines by 2024!]
[[link removed]]


[ACT NOW. Click Here]
[[link removed]]


 

[Contribute]
[[link removed]]


_ACT for America Education, a 501(c)(3) organization._
_All donations are tax-deductible._

869 Lynnhaven Pkwy, 113 #411
Virginia Beach, VA 23452 USA

Contribute
[[link removed]]
| Charity Navigator
[[link removed]]
| Unsubscribe
[[link removed]]
 

[FB]
[[link removed]]
[TW]
[[link removed]]
[IN]
[[link removed]]
[LI]
[[link removed]]
[YT]
[[link removed]]
[RU]
[[link removed]]
[CO]
[[link removed]]