Hastings Center logo

December 15, 2022

Report Calls for Improved Oversight of Human-Animal Chimeric Research

Also Stresses Need for Clear Communication by Scientists and Journalists

A new report on the ethics of crossing species boundaries by inserting human cells into nonhuman animals–research surrounded by debate–makes recommendations clarifying the ethical issues and calling for improved oversight of this work. The special report, “Creating Chimeric Animals -- Seeking Clarity on Ethics and Oversight,” is the product of a Hastings Center project funded by the National Institute of Health. Read the report.

 

Investing in Aging in Place
Age-Friendly Homes Are Community Assets

Most Americans want to age in place, but many lack the “place” they need because of a range of factors, from NIMBY-ism to private market housing options that are unaffordable for most people. An event on December 8 framed this problem as a moral issue and discussed ways to change the narrative on providing age-friendly housing to moderate-income Americans. Watch the event.

This was the final event in a series of four events that explored findings in a recent report from The Hastings Center and the Joint Center for Housing Studies at Harvard. Watch the series, find resources, and read the report

 

What Are the Dobbs Decision's Far-Reaching Implications?
Legal & Bioethics Scholar Anita Allen Gives Penetrating Analysis

In addition to ending the Constitutional right to abortion, the arguments in the Dobbs decision have far-ranging implications for individual liberty, social welfare, medical practice, and patients’ access to information. Those implications were explained in a special event last week with Anita Allen, University of Pennsylvania professor of law, renowned author, Hastings Center fellow, and recipient of this year’s Bioethics Founders’ Award, in conversation with Hastings Center President Mildred Solomon. Watch the event.
 

Multimillion-Dollar Gene Therapies; Transgender Athletes
Hastings in the Media

One-and-done bargain? Several multimillion-dollar gene therapies are on the market, and companies justify their cost by saying that they are “one-and-done” cures or long-term treatments for expensive illnesses. But such drugs should not be considered a bargain, says Hastings Center research scholar Michael Gusmano. “There’s no question that these gene therapies are going to be expensive he told Wired. “The question is: At what level will payers push back and simply refuse to cover them.” Read the Wired article.

Burden of proof. In 18 states, laws prohibit transgender students from participating in sports consistent with their gender identity, but any advantage that transgender athletes may have depends on many factors, said Hastings Center President Emeritus Tom Murray. “There’s no good reason to limit the participation of transgender athletes where male athletes don’t have an advantage over women,” such as sailing, he said in an interview with Leaps magazine. “The burden of proof rests on those who want to restrict participation by transgender athletes. They must show that in this sport, at this level of competition, transgender athletes have a conspicuous advantage.” Read the Leaps article.

Last week, Murray moderated an event, “Genetic Advantages in Sports: When Do They Count as ‘Doping’?” Watch the event.
 

Upcoming Events


"Wrestling with Social and Behavioral Genomics," January 12.

"The Promise and Perils of Social and Behavioral Genomics" January 25.

 
VIEW EVENTS
The Hastings Center seeks to ensure responsible health and science policy and practice. We work to secure the wisest possible use of emerging technologies and fair, compassionate, and just health care for people across their lifespan.
Twitter
Facebook
Website
View this email in your browser
Copyright © 2022 The Hastings Center, All rights reserved.


 We strongly value your privacy and would never sell, give, or otherwise share your information. Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.