[ Raphael Warnock’s impressive win in Georgia not only gives the
Democrats crucial control of committees in the next session of
Congress. 51-49 is far more powerful than 50-50—and provides some
insurance for 2024.]
[[link removed]]

THE ADDED BENEFITS OF WARNOCK’S WIN  
[[link removed]]


 

Robert Kuttner
December 7, 2022
The American Prospect
[[link removed]]


*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

_ Raphael Warnock’s impressive win in Georgia not only gives the
Democrats crucial control of committees in the next session of
Congress. 51-49 is far more powerful than 50-50—and provides some
insurance for 2024. _

Democratic Sen. Rev. Raphael Warnock speaks during an election night
watch party, December 6, 2022, in Atlanta. Warnock defeated Republican
challenger Herschel Walker in a runoff election in Georgia., John
Bazemore/AP Photo // The American Prospect

 

Raphael Warnock’s impressive win in Georgia not only gives the
Democrats crucial control of committees in the next session of
Congress. A 51-49 Senate will make it easier to run investigative
hearings; it removes the power of Republicans in evenly divided
committees to bottle up nominations; and it leaves corporate Democrats
like Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema less power to block.

Warnock’s victory also provides vital insurance for the 2024 Senate
elections, when the Democrats face an unusually rough year. Due to the
luck of the draw, the class of ’24 includes at least four vulnerable
Democratic incumbents and no at-risk Republicans.

The vulnerable Democrats are Sherrod Brown in Ohio, Jacky Rosen in
Nevada, Jon Tester in Montana, and Joe Manchin in West Virginia.
Kyrsten Sinema also faces re-election and she could well be ousted in
a primary fight.

Of these, Brown has won three elections but by diminishing margins as
Ohio keeps trending more Republican. He was re-elected in 2018 with
53.4 percent of the vote. Unless Democrats have a very bad year, Brown
is the most secure of the vulnerable group. The others are shakier.

In Montana, Jon Tester had his best performance in 2018, when he won
with 50.3 percent of the vote. In his previous two elections, he
failed to clear 50 percent and won thanks to the presence of a
third-party candidate who drew off Republican votes. Tester is the
sole surviving Democrat in a state that had two back-to-back
Democratic governors and now has a Republican in Greg Gianforte.

In evenly divided Nevada, Catherine Cortez Masto squeaked through this
year, winning re-election by just under 7,000 votes. Jacky Rosen won
in 2018 with 50.4 percent of the vote.

And then there is Joe Manchin. He is often the skunk at the Democratic
picnic, but the alternative is a Republican. In 2018, Manchin was
re-elected 49.6 percent to 46.3 percent for Republican Patrick
Morrisey. But for the presence of a libertarian, who pulled 4.2
percent, Manchin might well have lost. Manchin will be 77 in 2024, and
will be a top Republican target.

Manchin seems to have failed to win his top legislative priority, his
side deal for expedited energy permitting, including the Mountain
Valley Pipeline, which would transport natural gas from West Virginia
to Virginia. His gambit of tacking this deal onto the defense
authorization bill
[[link removed]] failed.

Republicans will be eager to deny Manchin any kind of achievement.
Paradoxically, the Democrats’ 51-49 margin makes them less dependent
on Manchin, but frees Manchin to be even less of a party loyalist when
he finds that expedient.

Note that all these narrow Democratic wins happened in 2018, the best
Democratic year in recent political history. If the Democratic
presidential candidate doesn’t have coattails (Joe Biden, this means
you), or even worse, loses the 2024 election, all of them could go
down.

One ray of hope: If the kind of Republican nutjobs whom Democrats were
able to defeat in 2022 run in 2024, things might look better. That
sure helped elect Warnock. You might think Republicans would learn
from Georgia, but never count out the stupidity of MAGA.

Warnock’s victory at least provides some insurance. The Democrats
could lose one Senate seat and if they win the presidency they would
hold the Senate 50-50, with the vice president as tiebreaker as in the
current Congress. But they need a big presidential win and a good year
to make any of this happen.

_[ROBERT KUTTNER is co-founder and co-editor of The American Prospect,
and professor at Brandeis University’s Heller School.]_

_Read the original article at Prospect.org
[[link removed]].
Used with the permission. © The American Prospect
[[link removed]], Prospect.org [[link removed]], 2022.
All rights reserved. 
 
Support the American Prospect [[link removed]].
Click here [[link removed]] to support the Prospect's
brand of independent impact journalism_
 

* Rev. Raphael Warnock
[[link removed]]
* Georgia
[[link removed]]
* Senate
[[link removed]]
* 2022 Elections
[[link removed]]
* 2024 Elections
[[link removed]]
* Joe Manchin
[[link removed]]
* Kyrsten Sinema
[[link removed]]
* Biden Administration
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web
[[link removed]]

Submit via email
Frequently asked questions
[[link removed]]

Manage subscription
[[link removed]]

Visit xxxxxx.org
[[link removed]]

Twitter [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 




[link removed]

To unsubscribe, click the following link:
[link removed]