We disagree with them often, but on prison gerrymandering, the New York Post gets it right.
Prison Gerrymandering Project for December 7, 2022 The 2020 Census counted 2 million people in the wrong place. How does your voice in government suffer as a result?
For two decades, we've led the campaign to end prison gerrymandering [[link removed]], a problem that distorts democracy and is created because the Census Bureau inaccurately counts incarcerated people as residents of their prison cells instead of at their true homes. This unjust policy has brought together unexpected allies to call for change.
New York Post editorial shows diversity of support for ending prison gerrymandering [[link removed]] Yet another paper urges Census Bureau to put the issue at the top of its list of changes. [[link removed]]
by Mike Wessler
As the Census Bureau wrapped up its first public comment period in its planning process for the 2030 Census [[link removed]], an important — and to many, unexpected — voice called on it to finally end prison gerrymandering, a practice that distorts political representation by counting incarcerated people in the wrong place when redistricting. In an editorial, The New York Post [[link removed]], which is owned by News Corp — the same company that owns Fox News — called on the Bureau to finally count incarcerated people as residents of their homes instead of in their prison cells.
In its editorial, the Post notes that the Census Bureau’s practice of counting incarcerated people as residents of prisons is “a form of gerrymandering.” It explains that this practice gives extra political power to communities that host prisons at the expense of everyone else. The paper also points out that the Bureau fails to count incarcerated people the same way it does truckers, boarding-school students, military personnel, and others away from home on Census Day.
Some may be surprised that a paper like the Post, which has often taken conservative stances on issues related to crime and incarceration, would join the chorus of voices that have called for an end to prison gerrymandering. However, a closer examination of the history of this issue (including this 15-state summary of editorials and news articles presented to the Census Bureau in 2014 [[link removed]]) shows it has long received support across the country from both sides of the political spectrum, including.
Legislation ending prison gerrymandering often garners bipartisan support in states that fall across the full spectrum of party control, from Massachusetts [[link removed]], to New Jersey [[link removed]], to Tennessee [[link removed]]. More than 200 rural communities that host prisons have taken action to address this problem [[link removed]] in their local districts; and And most recently, the choice to count incarcerated people at home has received unanimous and bipartisan support [[link removed]] from Commission members in Montana.
Redistricting is a notoriously rancorous process, so how has addressing prison gerrymandering managed to avoid being bogged down in partisan political fights?
On a practical level, elected officials — particularly in local government — have experienced the distortive effects of prison gerrymandering firsthand [[link removed]]. And, as a matter of principle, the New York Post put it bluntly and eloquently when it said the practice is “fundamentally wrong, and at odds with the Census’ duty to provide a true picture of the nation.”
In closing its editorial, the Post said, “(prison gerrymandering) belongs at the top of the list” of issues the Census Bureau should address in the 2030 count. We disagree with many of the stances the paper has taken on many issues, but on this one, they took the words right out of our mouths.
Please support our work [[link removed]]
Our work is made possible by private donations. Can you help us keep going? We can accept tax-deductible gifts online [[link removed]] or via paper checks sent to PO Box 127 Northampton MA 01061. Thank you!
Other news: The New York Times Agrees [[link removed]]
It isn't just the New York Post that has called for the Census Bureau to end prison gerrymandering.
Counting incarcerated people at home is such a common sense idea that the New York Times — a paper that often strongly disagrees with the New York Post — has also long called for this change [[link removed]] to ensure equal representation in government.
Advocates to Census Bureau: End prison gerrymandering in 2030 [[link removed]]
Last month, we joined other criminal justice and voting rights organizations to call on the Census Bureau to begin the work to count incarcerated people at their homes [[link removed]] in the 2030 Census.
In our comments, we noted that the Bureau is failing to meet the needs of states and cities, and that it is treating incarcerated people differently than other people in similar situations.
Please support our work [[link removed]]
Our work is made possible by private donations. Can you help us keep going? We can accept tax-deductible gifts online [[link removed]] or via paper checks sent to PO Box 127 Northampton MA 01061. Thank you!
Our other newsletters Ending prison gerrymandering ( archives [[link removed]]) Criminal justice research library ( archives [[link removed]])
Update which newsletters you get [link removed].
You are receiving this message because you signed up on our website [[link removed]] or you met Peter Wagner or another staff member at an event and asked to be included.
Prison Policy Initiative [[link removed]]
PO Box 127
Northampton, Mass. 01061
Web Version [link removed] Unsubscribe [link removed] Update address / join other newsletters [link removed] Donate [[link removed]] Tweet this newsletter [link removed] Forward this newsletter [link removed]
You are receiving this message because you signed up on our website or you met Peter Wagner or another staff member at an event and asked to be included.
Prison Policy Initiative
PO Box 127 Northampton, Mass. 01061
Did someone forward this to you? If you enjoyed reading, please subscribe! [[link removed]] Web Version [link removed] | Update address [link removed] | Unsubscribe [link removed] | Share via: Twitter [link removed] Facebook [[link removed] Email [link removed]
