From Vaccine Choice Canada <[email protected]>
Subject V-Bulletin June/July 2019
Date July 29, 2019 11:15 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Click here to view this email in your browser [1]

VACCINE CHOICE CANADA
V-BULLETIN
JUNE/JULY 2019

Dear Members & Friends of Vaccine Choice Canada,

IN THIS ISSUE: 

* New Brunswick Education Minister justifies plan to ban children from
school
* British Columbia - New Mandatory Reporting Regulations
* Events and Petitions
* Fundraising appeal
* In the News

NEW BRUNSWICK EDUCATION MINISTER JUSTIFIES PLAN TO BAN CHILDREN FROM SCHOOL

By Heather Fraser MA, BA, BEd

Riding a wave of measles hysteria in the US [2], the NB Minister of
Education Dominic Cardy has made national headlines stoking fears of doom
unless every child in the province is vaccinated… for everything. In a
recent CBC article [3], Min. Cardy likened partially or unvaccinated
children to guns.

So far in 2019, there have been 77 cases of measles in Canada [4] - that's
77 people over 6 months in a population of 37 million people. 11 cases of
measles have been reported in NB since April. Their recoveries did not
attract mainstream media coverage.

And this is as it has been every year in Canada for the last many years:
in 2013, 83 measles cases were reported in Canada; in 2014, 418 cases; in
2015, 196 cases.

And yet, in May, Minister Cardy tabled amendments to the Education Act and
the Public Health Act (Bill 39). The amendments remove all non-medical
exemptions and give school superintendents the power to refuse admission to
non-compliant students. In other words, Minister Cardy plans to withhold
the right to public education from children who are not compliant with the
government vaccination schedule [5]. The government takes no responsibility
for vaccine injury.

How has Minister Cardy justified these extreme measures given that there
is no crisis of any sort in the province or Canada?

IN MINISTER CARDY’S OWN WORDS FROM THE NB HANSARD

On June 11 during second reading of his amendments, Minister Cardy
defended his stance [6] in a soliloquy worthy of a tent evangelist:

> _Two hundred-plus years ago, when the first inoculations against polio
> were discovered, they were described by some members of the
> constitutional conventions that were in the process of forming the
> republic of the United States of America as being miracles bestowed upon
> our species by Providence and a Divine Creator showing his blessing for
> that project. _
That's not Donald Trump. It's Dominic Cardy.

Here the minister has conjured a fiction about the history of the polio
vaccine stating it was created in the 18th century (actually, the Salk
vaccine was introduced in 1955, the Sabin oral in 1962, and there was a
form of nasal spray in 1937). He continues in his bid for mandatory
vaccination in NB by citing the views of the authors of the 1787 US
constitution. He even manages to imply that God is pro-vaccine.

The proselytizing continued.

Never mind the other public health measures such as clean drinking water,
sanitation, medical care, peaceful conditions, education and nutrition -
Minister Cardy suggests that no other measure has had a meaningful role to
play in reducing disease morbidity or mortality:

> _The diseases that we cure through vaccines are not connected to other
> areas of public health, except in the most tenuous of ways. That is why
> decades ago-- just decades ago--despite 60 or 70 years of an incredibly
> strong public health regime in Western countries, we continued to see
> people dying of polio, we continued to see people dying of diphtheria,
> and we continued to see people dying of measles…_
Actually, in the 20th century there was a rapid and dramatic decline in
mortality from all diseases thanks to these other health measures. A
summary of US vital statistics [7] concluded:

> _THUS, VACCINATION DOES NOT ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPRESSIVE DECLINES IN
> MORTALITY SEEN IN THE FIRST HALF OF THE CENTURY...NEARLY 90% OF THE
> DECLINE IN INFECTIOUS DISEASE MORTALITY AMONG US CHILDREN OCCURRED BEFORE
> 1940, WHEN FEW ANTIBIOTICS OR VACCINES WERE AVAILABLE. _
And yet, Minister Cardy continued [6] to single out partially or
unvaccinated children as a threat:

> _…if you are going into a school system today, nearly every school in
> the province has a list of restrictions, including peanut butter,
> shellfish, eggs, coconut, and milk products. The list goes on and on--the
> list of things that are prohibited, restricted, or banned in New
> Brunswick schools. Yet we turn around and say: Okay, it is fine to come
> in with a communicable, potentially fatal disease that could actually
> kill your classmates._
The irony of this comment cannot be lost on VCC readers. The current
epidemic [8] of life threatening food allergies [9] (10% of children
according to a 2011 study) is the result of over vaccination, the use of
aluminum containing vaccines and the liberal use of antibiotics.

The vaccination status of the 11 people who had measles has been withheld.
Yet, Minister Cardy [6] seems to have the facts:

> _.. it is coming back. Why is it coming back? It is coming back because
> of a tolerance of beliefs for far too long and for failing to stand up to
> misinformation, to falsehoods, and to active conspiracies, rather than
> standing up and saying: I stand up for the truth that I can see and
> defend. I know the research is there and the facts support that case.
> Instead, they will say: It depends. Let's look at all sides of this
> story. Let's look at the pros and the cons. Mr. Speaker, I have no time
> for such people. _
TIME FOR SOME FACTS

Measles is considered eliminated in Canada suggesting there may be a
sufficient level of antibody protection to control outbreaks. Let's see.
With a little rough guesswork it turns out, it is possible that less than
67% of Canadians have antibodies to measles either from natural infection
(born before 1975) or vaccination. 33% of Canadians - primarily adults
between age 30 and 45 - may have none. Did Min. Cardy have measles?

Further, new research [10] reveals that vaccine-induced immunity wanes
significantly despite high vaccine coverage:

> _ …the traditional measles correlate of protection may not be an
> appropriate measure of population protection in measles-eliminated
> settings. _
In other words, there is far more to immunity than vaccine-induced
antibodies - that disappear. And adding more doses to generate this effect
is not only without benefit but also it has been shown to have negative
consequences. Dr. G. Poland [11] explained what he calls the "measles
paradox":

> _Thus, measles outbreaks also occur even among highly vaccinated
> populations because of primary and secondary vaccine failure, which
> results in gradually larger pools of susceptible persons and outbreaks
> once measles is introduced. This leads to a paradoxical situation whereby
> measles in highly immunized societies occurs primarily among those
> previously immunized. _
Such important inquiry is surely not beyond the abilities of the NB
government. So, why are none of the MLAs challenging Minister Cardy?

WHY IS THIS HAPPENING IN NB?

The hysteria over measles in Canada and the US is a mainstream media
fuelled fiction paving the way for captured governments to erase rights.
Vaccination is not about the health of individual children. If it was,
there would be screening for contraindications including mitochondria
function, MTHFR gene mutation, issues with liver and kidney function.

Instead, new laws restricting vaccine choice without recognition of
vaccine injury have been created in Ontario and BC with some discussion in
Alberta and Manitoba. In NY State a draconian law has expunged religious
exemptions. In California, exemptions have been removed and the government
is in the process of narrowing medical exemptions. In CA, all children from
birth to grade 12 must be vaccinated if they are to take part in a
"classroom like setting". Many US states have become battle grounds over
the right to autonomy over one's own body.

This biopolitics or biopower according to Michel Foucault sees the
insertion of corporate power into the decisions of government, directly or
indirectly, through strategies and mechanisms designed to achieve control
over populations. The results of the mandated consumption of
pharmaceuticals are rising profits for shielded corporations and the
download of the costs of injury and death to citizens - whose rights are
being eroded by such laws as those proposed by Minister Cardy.

Vaccine induced food allergies, neurological and other debilitating
injuries are at epidemic levels. And yet, elected officials see no need for
investigation. How long will citizens tolerate government gaslighting?

This may be just the beginning in NB - but the harder people are pushed,
the stronger the health freedom movement becomes.

WHAT’S NEXT? STAND UP FOR HEALTH FREEDOM AUGUST 27-29 IN FREDERICTON!

Minister Cardy suggests [6] the courts will likely side with him if there
is a Charter challenge. He also implies that vaccination should be mandated
for all Canadian children:

> _If there are any questions around constitutionality in the courts, we
> welcome the opportunity to clarify our position and to stand up for the
> children--not just students in New Brunswick but students across Canada.
> _

Concerned?

Here is your opportunity to be heard!

PUBLIC HEARINGS ON BILL 39 AN ACT RESPECTING PROOF OF IMMUNIZATION will
take place Aug. 27-29 at the legislative assembly in Fredericton.
[link removed]
[12]

NEW BRUNSWICK MANDATES - TAKE ACTION [13] - VCC

LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF NEW BRUNSWICK - JUNE 11 WEBCAST [6] - vaccine
discussions 1:03 - 1:07 and bill reading at 1:15 (Hansard not yet available
online)

*****

BRITISH COLUMBIA - NEW MANDATORY REPORTING REGULATIONS

By the VCC Research Team

As of of July 1st, 2019, a new mandatory 'Vaccination Status Reporting
Regulation' [14] came into effect in British Columbia. The newly introduced
regulations to the BC Public Health Act mean that it is now mandatory for
parents to report the vaccination status of their children attending school
and daycare. There are three mandatory requirements:

> 1. Mandatory disclosure of the child's vaccine status. For parents who do
> not vaccinate according to the recommended schedule, a written, signed
> and dated statement providing their reason for not vaccinating for each
> scheduled vaccine is required.
>
> 2. Mandatory attendance at an _“INFORMATION SESSION”_. Regulations
> taking effect in September 2020 demand that parents who choose not to
> vaccinate or who vaccinate selectively or choose an alternate vaccine
> schedule are forced to attend, _“TOGETHER WITH THEIR CHILD”_, the
> _“INFORMATION SESSION”_.
>
> 3. Mandatory meeting with a medical officer of health or a public health
> nurse following the vaccine _"information session"_. Rather than provide
> parents with a simple form that exempts their child from vaccines based
> on broadly accepted Charter rights of conscience, personal belief and
> religion, parents and children will have to face a medical interrogator,
> which could be construed as an additional intimidation and shamming
> tactic.
These three mandatory requirements are being imposed despite the fact that
public health officials already have access to everyone's medical records
in the province and thus already know which children are in compliance with
the provincial vaccine schedule [15] and those who are not.

A number of parents who do not vaccinate according to the provincial
vaccine schedule have contacted us with letters from their local public
health units that contain their child's vaccination status. What is
self-evident is that Public Health already has the necessary information on
vaccine status for these children.

Since health officials already have access to every child's medical
record, it begs the question whether these new Regulations are a sincere
request for information, or an effort at coercion and instilling fear in
parents.

Furthermore, introducing the THREAT OF LARGE FINES AND/OR IMPRISONMENT for
non-compliance with administrative requirements of reporting vaccination
status, submitting written statements on reasons for not vaccinating, as
well as attending mandatory information sessions and meetings with a health
official is especially draconian.

These new regulations make it increasingly challenging for BC citizens to
exercise their legal right to medical decision-making and protecting the
privacy of their medical records. As well, there is the real potential to
undermine the medical ethic of informed consent, thus threatening our most
basic liberties.

Any efforts to impose vaccine products by coercion alters the relationship
between a government and its citizens and UNDERMINES TRUST IN BOTH
GOVERNMENT AND THE MEDICAL PROFESSION.

TO RECAP - WHAT THE NEW REGULATIONS MEAN COMES DOWN TO THIS:

> Sec 5(2): mandates the vaccine status report or proof of vaccination,
>
> Sec 6: mandates a written and signed statement if your child is not
> fully vaccinated including the reason for not vaccinating with all or
> some vaccines,
>
> Sec 7(3)a: mandates attendance at information session WITH your not
> fully vaccinated child (!) and meeting w/public health officer/nurse also
> WITH your child!
By not complying with any one of these three mandatory Regulations would
constitute an infraction and would put families at risk of being subjected
to undue harsh retaliation and punishment by the state.

IN A LEGAL OPINION RECEIVED FROM A CANADIAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SPECIALIST
ON THE NEW BC REGULATIONS, WE LEARNED THAT;

> _"The new Regulations, in concert and through ss.107 and 108 of the
> Public Health Act, impose draconian measures, as well as monetary fines
> of up to $200,000.00 and up to six (6) months in jail, and flagrantly
> violate:_
>
> _(a) a person's freedom of conscience and belief contrary to s.2 of the
> Charter;_
>
> _(b) a person's freedom and security of the person to their physical and
> psychological integrity, over the control and decisions over their own
> body, contrary to s. 7 of the Charter, with a law that is "overly broad",
> which is contrary to the tenets of fundamental justice under s.7 of the
> Charter, in not allowing for any personal or individual exemptions;_
>
> _(c) violates the right to equal treatment under the law, contrary to
> s.15 of the Charter, in that the Regulations and Act do not apply to
> Indigenous persons, which clearly vitiates the validity and valid
> objective of the law with respect to its purported purpose."_

The THREAT OF FINES AND IMPRISONMENT for non-compliance to a mandatory
reporting regulation are especially drastic as this is an administrative
process only that will not reduce the public risk of contracting a
communicable disease.

Further, it is being applied in a coercive and discriminatory manner. The
government press release on this mandatory reporting regulation states:
_"Most parents are already in compliance with this requirement, so they
will NOT NEED TO DO ANYTHING FURTHER WHEN THE NEW SCHOOL YEAR STARTS.”_

However, the parents who have received letters from their local public
health units containing an immunization status record for their child
actually indicate that further action is required EVEN THOUGH THE RECORD IS
ON FILE AND THEY ARE THUS IN COMPLIANCE. Further actions include the
directives to make a copy of the file, take it to their child's school
(which is noted in the letter) and call the public health unit for an
appointment. These letters are only being sent to PARENTS IF THEIR CHILD
HAS NOT RECEIVED ALL RECOMMENDED VACCINATIONS. Why are these parents
singled out since the records are already on file and they are in
compliance with the reporting regulation?

In a June 28 Global News Report [16] regarding this new legislation,
Health Minister Adrian Dix is quoted as saying, _"It's a significant
change. The first year will involve engaging with parents to ensure we have
a full record."_ He also said, _"we think mandatory reporting makes sense
for everyone: schools, parents and communities."_

Vaccine Choice Canada disagrees with the Health Minister's opinion that
_"mandatory reporting makes sense for everyone."_ Although the new
Regulations do not make vaccination mandatory, we see this as a step in
that direction. DEAR BC PARENTS [17] outlines our concerns with the new
Regulations and we hope it inspires BC parents to take action against
government imposed medical tyranny.

We also provide additional resources and information on our Dear BC
Parents page that parents can print off and take to their MLA to help them
articulate why they are opposed to the new regulation. As well, we
encourage parents to exercise their right to medical records privacy and
the right to make voluntary and informed medical decisions for their
families.

BC parents should also know that, in Ontario, _"parents are now refusing
to attend education sessions, sign affidavits and are continuing to send
their children to school even when they have received a notice of
suspension."_

On a positive note, VCC billboards have been placed along a busy highway
in West Kelowna. These are the same billboards that were posted in the
Greater Toronto Area in February. These billboards contain simple messages
informing parents that vaccines have risks and that vaccines are not
required for school. You can view the billboards as rotating slides on the
main page of our website.

In Toronto, our billboards remained up for about 5 days before being
forced down by pro-pharma bullies. In BC, they have been up in that
location since June the 29th! There has been no media attention regarding
these billboards nor any official calls to take them down. As of today,
July the 29th, the billboards have been on display for a month, potentially
being seen by thousands of drivers on the highway.

We will continue to encourage and support BC parents to stand strong in
their convictions and to resist coercion in the face of these new
heavy-handed Regulations.
*****

EVENTS AND PETITIONS

OUR CHOICE CANADA - PRESERVING MEDICAL FREEDOM THROUGH EDUCATION [18] -
Education Walk on August 31 in various locations throughout Canada

Our Choice Walk - Facebook (closed) group [19]

ONE DAY-ONE VOICE.  VOICE AGAINST VACCINE INJURY EPIDEMIC (VIE) [20] -
November 14, 2019 - Washington DC

PETITION TO NEW BRUNSWICK GOVERNMENT - List of Canadians against Mandatory
Vaccination [21]

FUNDRAISING APPEAL

We knew it was coming. Mandates are now knocking at our door - AND WE NEED
YOUR HELP.

Currently, Vaccine Choice Canada is working on several fronts across the
country:

* in the public education realm via our continuously updated website and
ongoing communications through various other media
* in opposing legislation in NB, BC and ON
* installing billboards in BC, AB, MB, and ON
* in the legal realm
* in defending parent's rights against the ISPA in Ontario
* bringing in medical and science experts to testify to vaccine risks and
the fundamental right to medical freedom
* and most importantly keeping our membership informed and up to date

You, our members, are critically important. You are spreading the word to
friends and family, to your communities and representatives, to your health
care providers and others.

We are here to serve you, to equip you to do this, and to defend your
rights to freedom of speech and freedom of medical choice.

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR WORK [22] WITH A GENEROUS DONATION – ESPECIALLY AS WE
PREPARE TO DEFEAT BILL 39 IN NB WHICH WOULD USHER IN MANDATED VACCINES TO
NB AND SET A PRECEDENT FOR OTHER JURISDICTIONS TO FOLLOW.

IN THE NEWS

Former chiropractor ordered to pay $100K related to anti-vaccine posts [23]


Freedom to Dissent and the New Blacklist in America [24] - Barbara Loe
Fisher - "The right to autonomy and protection of bodily integrity is the
first human right. If you cannot voluntarily decide when and for what
reason you are willing to risk your life or the life of your child, your
unalienable right to life and liberty has been taken from you."

Antisocial Media, Your Censor-slip Is Showing [25] by Nancy Hokkanen

Theresa Deisher Ph.D - Rebuttal to CHOP - Childrens Hospital of
Pennsylvania statement on fetal cell line contamination of vaccines [26]

The Real Reason for the Increase in Medical Exemptions [27]

Death Rate increases in Elderly re Fluzone-High Dose [28]

The Autism Blame Game: This Time, It's the Womb [29] - "It is time to put
a halt to both victim blaming and evasiveness and recognize that an
autism/ASD diagnosis is a cover term for damage caused by environmental
toxins that need to be explicitly studied, named and eliminated."

Germany to bring in fines and bans if parents refuse vaccination [30]

The Medical Journals Sell Out - Getting Paid to Play [31] -
"Pharmaceutical companies supply journals with needed income, and in
return, journals play a key role in suppressing studies that raise critical
questions about vaccine risks--which would endanger profits."

A Victory for Truth and Justice in Australia [32]

Febrile Seizures Tied to High Risk of Mental Illness, Epilepsy [33]
(requires registration)

High Rate of Febrile Seizures Seen in Sudden Unexplained Toddler Deaths
[34] (requires registration)

Anna Maria Tremonti's Last Broadcast [35] by Janet McNeill

Bretigne Shaffer on California SB 276 [36] - "There is something very
deeply wrong with a society that demands of parents that they first injure
their children before they are allowed to decline a medical procedure."

Regaining Our Right To Refuse Vaccinations [37] by Laura Hayes

How the Institute of Medicine Helped Suppress Questions About Vaccine
Safety [38]

Google manipulates searches and has scrubbed access to natural health
websites [39]

MMR Vaccine Licensing Called Into Question Following ICAN's Latest FOIA
Exposure of FDA Coverup [40]

Dr. Bob Sears speaking to CA legislators about the threat to medical
exemptions [41]

Dr. David Brownstein on the toxicity of polysorbate 80 found in most
vaccines [42] - "With vaccines, polysorbate 80 allows the ingredients in a
vaccine to penetrate the brain. Since vaccines contain viral and bacterial
components as well as toxic metals (such as mercury and aluminum) along
other nefarious ingredients, why would anyone think that injecting
polysorbate 80 into a human being, much less a child who has a poorly
developed blood brain barrier, is acceptable?"

RFK Jr. on Vaxxed-Unvaxxed [43]

NY Ends Religious Exemptions for Vaccines, Violating Constitutional Rights
of Millions [44]

New Brunswick resident's appeal to MLAs on mandatory vaccination vote [45]

Real-Life Fascist Advocates Medical Fascism in Real Life [46]

Failure of Polio Eradication by Jeff Dach MD [47]

Pertussis: Vaccine Failure. Not failure to vaccinate [48]

Talking Trash About Parents at the World Health Assembly 2019 [49]

What is going on with Measeles? [50] Barbara Loe Fisher in depth report

Measles caused by MMR vaccine reaction [51]

RFK Jr. Gardasil Science Day Revelations [52] - jaw dropping: The
transcript [53] This is a tool for pediatricians and doctors to help them
understand the issues with Gardasil. The video in which he presents the
huge and devastating picture of regulatory agency corruption that has led
to this "cataclysm".

New Centre at U of T Dalla Lana School of Public Health to promote
vaccines and fight vaccine hesitancy [54]

Dennis Linthicum - Oregon Senator defends parents rights regarding vaccine
decisions [55]

VACCINE CHOICE CANADA IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY DEDICATED TO
PROMOTING HEALTH AMONG CANADIANS BY HELPING FAMILIES MAKE FULLY INFORMED
AND VOLUNTARY CHOICES ABOUT VACCINATION. VACCINE CHOICE CANADA RECEIVES NO
FUNDING FROM GOVERNMENT OR CORPORATE SOURCES AND IS SOLELY SUPPORTED BY OUR
MEMBERS. LEARN MORE ABOUT VACCINES, DISEASES AND HOW TO PROTECT YOUR
CHILDREN FROM VACCINE INDUCED INJURIES. BECOME A MEMBER OF VACCINE CHOICE
CANADA AND RECEIVE OUR INTERNATIONALLY ACCLAIMED NEWSLETTERS. CONTACT US
THROUGH OUR WEBSITE, WWW.VACCINECHOICECANADA.COM [56] OR EMAIL US AT:
[email protected]

VACCINE CHOICE CANADA ON TWITTER [57] | Vaccine Choice Canada on FACEBOOK
[58]

This V-Bulletin was sent to subscribers (online or at events) and members
of Vaccine Choice Canada (formerly VRAN). If you received this message in
error please unsubscribe at the the Unsubscribe link at the bottom of this
e-mail. If you are not a subscriber and this e-mail was forwarded to you,
please make that request to the person who sent this to you. If you are not
a subscriber but would like to become one click here [22]. View past issues
here [59].

To ensure delivery to your inbox, please add [email protected]
to your address book.

Unsubscribe [60] | Subscribe [59] | Opt out [61]

Vaccine Choice Canada P.O. Box 169
Winlaw, BC V0G 2J0
Canada

[email protected]



Links:
------
[1] [link removed]
[2] [link removed]
[3] [link removed]
[4] [link removed]
[5] [link removed]
[6] [link removed]
[7] [link removed]
[8] [link removed]
[9] [link removed]
[10] [link removed]
[11] [link removed]
[12] [link removed]
[13] [link removed]
[14] [link removed]
[15] [link removed]
[16] [link removed]
[17] [link removed]
[18] [link removed]
[19] [link removed]
[20] [link removed]
[21] [link removed]
[22] [link removed]
[23] [link removed]
[24] [link removed]
[25] [link removed]
[26] [link removed]
[27] [link removed]
[28] [link removed]
[29] [link removed]
[30] [link removed]
[31] [link removed]
[32] [link removed]
[33] [link removed]
[34] [link removed]
[35] [link removed]
[36] [link removed]
[37] [link removed]
[38] [link removed]
[39] [link removed]
[40] [link removed]
[41] [link removed]
[42] [link removed]
[43] [link removed]
[44] [link removed]
[45] [link removed]
[46] [link removed]
[47] [link removed]
[48] [link removed]
[49] [link removed]
[50] [link removed]
[51] [link removed]
[52] [link removed]
[53] [link removed]
[54] [link removed]
[55] [link removed]
[56] [link removed]
[57] [link removed]
[58] [link removed]
[59] [link removed]
[60] [link removed]
[61] [link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis