Things could get a little dicey later this week at The New York Times. The Times NewsGuild, which represents about 1,450 employees, has warned management that they will walk out for 24 hours starting Thursday if a new contract is not reached.
Kevin Draper, a Times sports reporter, told Vanity Fair’s Charlotte Klein, “We are all operating under the assumption that we are walking out on Thursday.”
Negotiations are continuing, but Klein reports what contingency plans are being put in place if there is a walkout. She writes, “Since Friday, there have been a series of meetings to prepare for the work stoppage, according to a Times editor. Some managers are looking into how to pull more stories off the wires to fill gaps in the report and asking people individually whether they plan to work on Thursday, according to two Times reporters.”
Klein also wrote that various staffers have been asked to file stories early or do advance work, like you might see during holiday schedules.
In a statement to The Poynter Report, Times spokesperson Danielle Rhoades Ha said, “While we are disappointed that the NewsGuild is threatening to strike, we are prepared to ensure the Times continues to serve our readers without disruption.”
Axios’ Sara Fischer wrote last week, “The two parties have been at odds for more than a year and a half over a slew of issues, most notably wage increases. Those tensions have hit a boiling point heading into the holiday season.”
Rhoades Ha’s statement said, “We remain committed to working with the NYT NewsGuild to reach a contract that we can all be proud of. Our current wage proposal offers significant increases. The majority of members of the bargaining unit would earn 50 percent or more in additional earnings over the life of the new contract than they would have if the old contract had continued. Moreover, our accompanying medical and retirement proposals offer sustainable, best-in-class options for Guild members.”
Fischer, however, wrote, “A big part of the union's argument has long been that the Times' management has refused to bring adequate wage increase proposals to the negotiating table, despite the fact that the Times is doing better financially than it has in many years and continues to increase dividend payouts to shareholders.”
It all could be coming to a head this week.
Draper told Klein the union just didn’t go from “zero to walkout.” He told Klein, “I would prefer to just be doing my job on Thursday. (But) if they are not moving on hundreds of people writing them emails, thousands sending them a petition about return to office, and dozens of bargaining sessions, it felt like something a little bigger was needed, and that’s how we arrived at the current moment of potentially walking out Thursday.”
Stay tuned.
All the advertising that’s fit to print
More from the Times. If you went to the homepage of The New York Times website on Tuesday, you were immediately hit with a rather large advertisement by General Electric. Wait, there’s more. As Axios’ Sara Fischer reported, Tuesday’s print version of the Times was flooded with ads by GE.
Fischer wrote, “It’s the first time in the paper’s 171-year history that any advertiser has gotten to own all of The Times’ print real estate exclusively — in addition to most of its premier digital advertising real estate.”
The print product had 22 full-page color ads from GE, plus five partial page ads. The print version of the Times is delivered to 333,000 subscribers, and is sold on newsstands throughout the country. GE also had prominent ads on the desktop and mobile home pages, “The Daily” podcast and the Times’ morning and afternoon newsletter briefings.
Fischer wrote, “The partnership represents a shift at The Times in the last ten years from selling pages ad hoc to building big, interactive marketing campaigns for brands that are highly produced and can earn their own coverage. … The seven-figure campaign centers on GE’s core message of focus, as it begins a plan to split into three publicly-traded companies: GE HealthCare, GE Aerospace and GE Vernova (energy).”
BuzzFeed cuts
More grim journalism news on Tuesday. BuzzFeed announced it is cutting 12% of its staff — about 180 employees.
In an email to staff, CEO Jonah Peretti wrote, “In order for BuzzFeed to weather an economic downturn that I believe will extend well into 2023, we must adapt, invest in our strategy to serve our audience best, and readjust our cost structure.”
Peretti also wrote, “I want all of you, but especially those that are receiving difficult news today, to know that these changes do not reflect on the good work that these employees have done over the years to build our company and our brands.”
Variety’s Todd Spangler has many more details about BuzzFeed’s business situation, as well as the entire memo sent out by Peretti.
I just mentioned how it was “more grim news.” The cuts at BuzzFeed come a week after CNN and Gannett laid off at least two hundred employees each.
Strong segment