What the mass exodus from law school rankings means for American legal education
[link removed]
CounterCurrent: Yale Parts the Rankings Sea
What the mass exodus from law school rankings means for American legal education
CounterCurrent is the National Association of Scholars’ weekly newsletter, bringing you the biggest issues in academia and our responses to them.
[link removed]
Category: Legal Education; Reading Time: ~2 minutes
------------------------------------------------------------
** Featured Article - "Was Shakespeare Right? Should We Kill All the Lawyers?" by Richard Vedder ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. News & World Report published its first college ranking list almost exactly 40 years ago, in 1983. In the years since the U.S. News list first appeared, it has, for better or for worse, become the most influential college ranking scheme in America, serving as a reference point for prospective students and employers alike.
Although its methodology has often come under fire for the way it relies on peer assessments ([link removed]) and self-reported data ([link removed]) , the controversy has not been enough to topple the U.S. News list. Whether due to a lack of suitable alternatives or mere force of habit, Americans with a stake in the higher education game continue to refer to the U.S. News list for the latest scoop on America’s top colleges and universities.
Last month, however, the U.S. News ranking faced its greatest challenge yet, this time from a growing number of law schools that claim the law school rankings ([link removed]) fail to adequately reward their work to advance equity in the legal profession. At the front of the pack was Yale Law School (YLS), which has been ranked number one by U.S. News since the law school rankings began in 1987. YLS dean Heather K. Gerken announced in a press release ([link removed]) on November 16 that "the rankings process is undermining the core commitments of the legal profession" and declared that YLS would be "walk[ing] away from the rankings in order to pursue [their] own path forward." Harvard Law School released a similar statement ([link removed]) mere hours later, followed
by most of the other ([link removed]) Top-14 (T-14) schools.
The stream of schools dropping out of the rankings has slowed in the weeks since Yale’s announcement, but it has not yet stopped. Just yesterday, New York University Law School ([link removed]) , one of a small handful of hold-outs from the T-14 schools, announced that it, too, planned to withdraw from the rankings. Now, only three T-14 schools remain: University of Chicago (#3), University of Virginia (#8), and Cornell University (#12).
In light of this mass exodus, it’s worth asking where, exactly, Yale’s "new path forward" leads—and why other top law schools are so eager to follow. Dean Gerken’s statement listed several reasons for their departure, including U.S. News’s purported failure to recognize YLS’s "critical support for students seeking public interest careers" and to properly calculate student debt loads. One of the most significant reasons, at least for the future of American legal education, came near the end: "20% of a law school’s overall ranking is median LSAT/GRE scores and GPAs … [which] imposes tremendous pressure on schools to overlook promising students."
In a not-so-curious coincidence, just two days after YLS released its statement questioning the value of quantitative metrics, the American Bar Association’s (ABA) governing board voted ([link removed]) to eliminate the mandate requiring accredited law schools to use standardized test scores in admissions. The ABA, it seems, is more than happy to support Yale in its new venture outside the bounds of merit, accountability, and quantitative measures of success.
In this week’s featured article ([link removed]) , National Association of Scholars Board Member Richard Vedder discusses the broader trend in higher education that the revolt against the U.S. News rankings reflects:
In their zeal to reduce achievement gaps between races, sexes, and more, higher education is downplaying merit—the concept that those who are likely to do better should get the biggest rewards. This perspective has long determined most Americans’ vocational success. Rewards should be based on competence and achievement, not skin coloration, sexual preferences, religious orientations, family background, wealth, or other such characteristics.
These concerns are not merely philosophical. Lowering standards in America’s professional schools has real-world consequences. As Vedder suggests, the move away from merit in our top law schools will inevitably lead to the creation of "lawyers without the academic background and the diligence needed to master constitutional mandates, statutory strictures, judicial precedents, or regulatory dictates."
Yale and its compatriots may be able to escape the consequences of abandoning merit and accountability—but the future clients of the attorneys they produce may not be so lucky.
Until next week.
Marina Ziemnick
Communications Associate
National Association of Scholars
Read More ([link removed])
For more on the decline of American legal education:
[link removed]
March 29, 2022
** (Dis)Order in the Court ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Marina Ziemnick
Today’s elite law students believe that civil discourse and freedom of speech are obsolete. Both have been sacrificed at the altar of progressive values.
[link removed]
February 08, 2022
** The Editor Strikes Back ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Marina Ziemnick
Through its censorious behavior, the Emory Law Journal has done more than tarnish its good name. It has undermined its very reason for existence.
[link removed]
January 20, 2022
** NAS Urges the University of Pennsylvania Law School to Affirm Amy Wax's Freedom of Speech ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
National Association of Scholars
The University of Pennsylvania Law School should affirm Amy Wax’s good name and dismiss the complaint against her on principle.
[link removed]
July 27, 2021
** DEI Comes to Legal Education ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
David Acevedo
How the American Bar Association's proposed accreditation standards would force law schools to engage in illegal discrimination.
** About the NAS
------------------------------------------------------------
The National Association of Scholars, founded in 1987, emboldens reasoned scholarship and propels civil debate. We’re the leading organization of scholars and citizens committed to higher education as the catalyst of American freedom.
============================================================
Follow NAS on social media.
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
| ** Join ([link removed])
| ** Renew ([link removed])
| ** Bookstore ([link removed])
Copyright © 2022 National Association of Scholars, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website, membership or donation forms, contact forms at events, or by signing open letters.
Our mailing address is:
National Association of Scholars
420 Madison Avenue
7th Floor
New York, NY 10017-2418
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
