View this email in your browser ([link removed])
** The magically disappearing budget surplus
------------------------------------------------------------
Dear John,
In May, Gov. Gavin Newsom made headlines for “unveiling a historic” $97.5 billion budget surplus. State lawmakers, giddy from the news, went on to approve a record-breaking $300 billion state budget ([link removed]) in June, throwing money and promises at countless causes and constituencies heading into election season.
“No other state in American history has ever experienced a surplus as large as this,” Newsom crowed, with obliging media cheering him on.
Fast forward to November, when the week after the election — by sheer coincidence, of course — the state’s nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) released a report ([link removed]) warning that the state is actually facing a $24 billion deficit.
The LAO recommends lawmakers consider budget cuts and putting the brakes on already-approved spending when they return to Sacramento.
“Last year, it was really fun to be in Sacramento,” Christopher Thornberg, a “forecasting expert” who has advised the state treasurer’s and controller’s offices, told reporters. “Everyone was trying to figure out how much money they could spend. This year, not so much.”
It’s clear that the state legislature’s blind ambition — to make sure that state spending sucked up every dollar of that one-time revenue growth — made it blissfully unaware of just how improbable and fleeting the gift was that they were squandering.
Now the LAO’s admits, “our revenue estimates represent the weakest performance the state has experienced since the Great Recession” — and it could get a whole lot worse. LAO’s projection is a baseline case, relying on several assumptions that could go sideways, tumbling the actual deficit into much more troubling territory.
For example, LAO acknowledges the likelihood of a deepening economic recession, but does not factor the impact of a recession into their tax revenue estimate. They write, “Were a recession to occur soon, revenue declines in the budget window very likely would be more severe than our outlook.”
And, in the section of their analysis where LAO presents worst case scenarios, they project general fund revenue dropping as low as $180 billion in 2024-25, which based on merely maintaining the current general fund budget reflects a deficit of $55 billion.
Of course, as CPC has warned repeatedly, these dismal numbers don’t include the mammoth pension obligations promised to government workers. The governor’s "historic surplus” was always a fantasy — state and local governments actually owed about $1.6 trillion ([link removed]) when underfunded pensions and unfunded debt are factored in.
How did we get here?
The budget approved in June included a whopping $235 billion allocated to the state’s general fund to finance most of the state’s ongoing operations for the fiscal year ending June 2023. Only ten years ago, California’s general fund was $93 billion, which adjusted for inflation would be $118 billion in today’s dollars. Meanwhile, California’s population over the past ten years has only grown from 38 million to 39 million. This means that inflation adjusted per capita general fund spending in California has increased from $3,124 back in 2013 to $6,023 today.
California’s state government is spending twice as much money ([link removed]) today per resident as it did just ten years ago.
And what have Californians reaped from this explosion in spending? By nearly every measure, things are worse off today in California. Obvious examples include expensive and unreliable energy and water, failing schools, rising crime, unaffordable housing and college tuition, and an exploding homeless population — but that’s hardly the entirety of the worsening challenges facing Californians.
The decade-long run of record tax revenue spawned an avalanche of new regulations, driving up prices, discouraging expansion of big business and crushing small businesses.
So the question before lawmakers today isn’t just how to cut spending or raise taxes in order to balance the budget. The prevailing question should be, how does California’s state legislature start to do the right thing instead of the wrong thing with taxpayers’ money?
They’ve doubled per capita spending in the last decade, yet ordinary hard working Californians can’t afford to live here any more. Clearly, so far they’re doing everything wrong.
As newly-elected legislators prepare to get sworn in next week, now is a good time to not only talk about how our state legislature is on the wrong course, but exactly how it can change its course.
If you want to realign the state’s politics, it isn’t enough to say taxes, crime, and prices for everything are too high, and educational achievement and the supply of housing are too low. Lawmakers have to propose concrete solutions.
Solutions exist, but California lacks politicians with the courage to promote them and the charisma to effectively convince voters of their efficacy.
New solutions. An entire new alternative vision. A prosperity budget. Not just how to balance the budget. Rather, how to allocate the budget, and how to deregulate the economy.
This is the real discussion that California needs.
Read more in the latest article from CPC senior fellow Edward Ring, "L ([link removed]) ooming Deficits Present Another Opportunity to Offer Solutions for California ([link removed]) ."
SUPPORT CPC ([link removed])
CLEO Director Mari Barke addresses newly-elected school board members.
** Newly-elected school board members meet for training in San Diego
------------------------------------------------------------
Mari Barke and Lance Christensen of California Policy Center joined with about 60 newly-elected parent school board members and another dozen parent advocates this week in San Diego for a special training organized by Pacific Research Institute. Senior Fellow at Pacific Research Institute, Lance Izumi, led the conference and invited Mari Barke, director of CPC's California Local Elected Officials (CLEO) and Trustee on the Orange County Board of Education, to be a featured speaker on the "How to be an Effective School Board Member" panel.
Many of the attendees were involved in CLEO’s Candidate Academy training this year and had been mentored by Barke and Christensen. The all-day training presented new school board members from across the state with information, advice and resources on important education issues such as understanding parental rights, school choice, and how to best represent parents and students, not teachers unions. The event was planned to better prepare new school board members as an alternative to the “Orientation for New Trustees” hosted by the California School Boards Association at the same time over at the convention center. The agendas were very different!
"It was an incredible day of like-minded individuals discussing important education issues they will be facing in the coming weeks," said Mari Barke. "There's so much genuine enthusiasm to take our school boards back and put students and families first. It was electric."
"We heard the stories of many incredible candidates who won their elections against the odds," said Lance Christensen, Vice President of Education Policy and Government Affairs at CPC who, along with Barke, joined the new school board members for a day of learning and networking. CPC hosted a dinner for training attendees following the event, which provided an excellent opportunity to continue the networking and introduce CLEO's new Leadership Academy.
"It's important that these new school board members continue to be provided with the resources and support they need as they take on their new role,” Christensen added. “We were excited to let them know about the new Leadership Academy CLEO is launching next week."
The CLEO Leadership Academy is a new 15-session virtual training and certification program for local elected officials in California taught by experienced elected officials, municipal staff, public policy experts and attorneys on the fundamentals of good governance. It builds upon the training modules developed last spring for candidates running for local office. The curriculum was developed in collaboration with Pete Peterson, dean of the Pepperdine School of Public Policy, one of California’s foremost experts in public policy and local governments. Featured presenters include Congressman-elect Kevin Kiley, former state Senator John Moorlach, City Councilmember Will O’Neill, and many others.
For more information on the CLEO Leadership Academy, visit calelecteds.org ([link removed]) .
SUPPORT CPC ([link removed])
New Podcast ()
[link removed]
** Radio Free California #253: Newsom Out
------------------------------------------------------------
CPC president Will Swaim and CPC board member David Bahnsen discuss Gavin Newsom’s latest pledge that he won’t run — “against Biden” — and consider how government regulation centralized corporate power in California’s rail, transit and oil industries. Listen now ([link removed]) . ([link removed])
More from CPC ()
** School Choice Tremors
------------------------------------------------------------
The election on November 8^th was good for the school choice movement. But as always, moves toward educational freedom don’t happen overnight and are state-specific. Larry Sand, president of the California Teacher's Empowerment Network, explains in this week's article ([link removed]) .
** Pension Costs are Still Eating Government Budgets
------------------------------------------------------------
Pension benefit enhancements enacted by gullible elected officials and egged on by public employee unions have led to pension payments moving from a negligible portion of civic budgets to ravenous monsters that threaten to drive every government agency in the state into insolvency. Read the article. ([link removed])
============================================================
ABOUT THE CALIFORNIA POLICY CENTER
The California Policy Center promotes prosperity for all Californians through limited government and individual liberty.
Learn more at ** CaliforniaPolicyCenter.org ([link removed])
.
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Instagram ([link removed])
Copyright © 2022 California Policy Center, All rights reserved.
We send periodic updates to those who opted in on californiapolicycenter.org
Our mailing address is:
California Policy Center
18002 Irvine Blvd Ste 108
Tustin, CA 92780-3321
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]