** Entergy leads the charge to re-elect Lambert Boissiere III, Louisiana utility commissioner in runoff election with major climate and energy consequences ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
By Shelby Green on Nov 23, 2022 12:39 pm
A runoff election for the Louisiana Public Service Commission is pitting an incumbent financially backed by the utility that he regulates against a challenger who has called on limiting utilities’ influence, with major implications for clean energy development.
Louisiana utility regulator Lambert Boissiere III is facing a challenge from Davante Lewis, who has highlighted Boissiere’s reliance on campaign contributions from utilities like Entergy, which the Commission regulates.
Boissiere has received almost three-fourths of his campaign contributions from people and entities closely related to the industries regulated by the PSC, including Entergy itself, according to a review of campaign filings from the Energy and Policy Institute. Entergy and Entergy employees were the single largest donors to Boissiere ([link removed]) from July 22 through the November 8 general election.
Boissiere, who took office in 2005, is seeking a final term on the Louisiana Public Service Commission, a five-person elected panel that regulates power, telecommunications, and water companies in the state. Boissiere represents District 2, the only majority-minority district that stretches across 10 parishes, from New Orleans to Baton Rouge.
** Race has major climate implications
------------------------------------------------------------
The impacts of the election outcome on electricity policy could stretch across the country ([link removed]) and into southern Canada. The Louisiana Public Service Commission (PSC) and Entergy have been instrumental in blocking transmission planning and development ([link removed]) at the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, or MISO, the regional grid operator in which Louisiana is a member. MISO is responsible for planning transmission development in a broad swath of the country stretching from Louisiana through the Upper Midwest. MISO recently approved ([link removed]) $10.3 billion in new transmission projects in its northern states, which it says will lower costs for customers while facilitating the retirement of coal and the addition of new clean power. MISO does not
expect ([link removed]) to undertake a similar long-range transmission planning process for the South until 2024.
The election could shift the Commission’s political dynamics with major consequences for Louisiana as well; currently, three Commissioners, including Boissiere, have regulated in ways that have favored expanded dependence on fossil fuels, while two Commissioners have ruled in ways that have shown more openness to clean energy development.
Boissiere has served on the Commission since 2005, and is currently its chair. Louisiana ranks 50th out of 50 for producing electricity from wind, solar, and energy storage power plants in the United States, according to American Clean Power ([link removed]) .
** Boissiere under fire for accepting money from Entergy executives
------------------------------------------------------------
Before filing for re-election, Boissiere had $166,836.42 on-hand ([link removed]) , bolstered by the help of donors like Entergy and AT&T, regulated entities long known for spending millions to shore up political support ([link removed]) for items that come before the Commission.
Four challengers filed to unseat Boissiere, who has been repeatedly criticized by his opponents for accepting campaign contributions from the companies he is supposed to regulate.
Boissiere and Lewis are both Democrats; Louisiana requires run-off elections between the top two candidates if no candidate receives 50 percent of the vote in a general election. Boissiere received 43 percent of the vote; Lewis received 18 percent; a third candidate finished with 17 percent. The runoff election is scheduled for December 10.
The challengers, including Lewis, campaigned on the platform that the Public Service Commission should ban contributions from regulated utility companies, following the lead of the New Orleans City Council, which did so earlier this year ([link removed]) . (The New Orleans City Council directly regulates Entergy’s New Orleans subsidiary; the PSC regulates the company in the rest of the state, as well as all other Louisiana investor-owned utilities.)
Boissiere defended accepting utility money: ([link removed]) “There’s no other way to finance a campaign […] what happens if you get beat every time because you couldn’t raise any money? The fact is, you can self regulate, but you can’t regulate your opponents.”
None of Boissiere’s opponents accepted campaign contributions from Entergy or other regulated entities, according to a campaign finance review by EPI. Gregory Manning, one of Boissiere’s challengers, said that he believed it is “morally wrong” ([link removed]) for a Commissioner to be financially dependent on donations from the entities they were elected to regulate. Lewis has pledged to create a rule barring campaign contributions from regulated entities, if elected.
Lewis also campaigned on a “ratepayer’s bill of rights ([link removed]) ” that would ban utility shutoffs during high energy usage months, limit late fees, cap profits for investor-owned utilities, break Entergy’s monopoly on power generation, and limit the influence of regulated companies like Entergy.
Combined, Boissiere’s opponents raised just $123,202 ([link removed]) from July 22 to November 8.
Boissiere’s challengers weren’t the only ones to slam him for accepting utility money. Keep the Lights On, a super PAC backed by the Environmental Defense Fund, spent a half a million dollars on a 30-second ad ([link removed]) , framing Boissiere as an Entergy puppet for taking “piles of campaign contributions from the same industries he’s supposed to regulate”.
** Entergy and other regulated entities are the top donors for Boissiere’s re-election campaign.
------------------------------------------------------------
Boissiere received more than 70% of his campaign cash ([link removed]) from people and entities closely related to the industries regulated by the PSC. That includes regulated companies and their employees, as well as the attorneys, lobbyists and consultants contracted to work on behalf of either the utilities or the commission itself, according to an analysis of campaign finance data by EPI.
ENPAC, the company’s political action committee, and Entergy’s top employees contributed nearly $12,500 ([link removed]) to Boissiere’s re-election bid.
On October 28, the Entergy PAC contributed $5,000 to Boissiere, and Entergy CEO Leo Denault and three other executives each gave $1,000. On November 3, another $3,500 came in from other Entergy executives and senior staff.
The header image was sourced from WAFB ([link removed]) .
The post Entergy leads the charge to re-elect Lambert Boissiere III, Louisiana utility commissioner in runoff election with major climate and energy consequences ([link removed]) appeared first on Energy and Policy Institute ([link removed]) .
Read in browser » ([link removed])
[link removed] [link removed]
** Recent Articles:
------------------------------------------------------------
** Xcel Energy is recruiting Minnesota cities to thwart governor’s clean energy agenda ([link removed])
** Southwest Gas increases its political contributions in Nevada ahead of the 2022 election ([link removed])
** Duke Energy “Carbon Plan” proceeding in North Carolina highlights the utility’s preference for monopolization over customer savings ([link removed])
** Vice President John Skory exits FirstEnergy after ‘violation’ ([link removed])
** Gas industry group is behind ‘Affordable Energy Fund’ PAC election mailers and digital ads targeting Ohio ([link removed]
============================================================
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2022 Energy and Policy Institute, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in at our website via our Contact Us page.
Our mailing address is:
Energy and Policy Institute
P.O. Box 170399
San Francisco, CA 94117
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
