Criminal organizations buy a good ESG score while the backbone of modern society is labeled untouchable.
Cowboy State Daily (11/18/22) reports: "Wyoming was an early critic of woke capitalism, as it’s sometimes called, but the problems that arise when mixing business and politics are coming to the forefront. This year, many state attorneys general and treasurers are taking a closer look at social credit scores in investing, and the role it played in facilitating the FTX digital currency scandal is likely to raise concerns about the ESG movement. The ESG movement rates funds on various markers of progressive-friendly policies related to protecting the environment, diversity in the workplace and community relations. Any association with fossil fuel industries quickly gets a fund rated down. Compliance with ESG is costly as well. Despite the fact it drives up the cost of business and the funds perform poorly, many large companies are champions of the investment philosophy. Alex Stevens, manager of policy and communications for the Institute for Energy Research, said ESG became a backdoor attempt at regulated oil and gas companies. It achieves 'things that politicians and environmental activists couldn’t achieve through a democratic political process,' Stevens told Cowboy State Daily. Whereas lawmakers, especially those in energy states like Wyoming, might not go along with agendas that harm economies, Stevens said ESG is a new iteration of rent-seeking behavior, referring to an economic concept where companies gain added wealth through government-funded social programs rather than gains in productivity. They use ESG as a 'corporate responsibility' disguise knowing that compliance drives up the cost of business, which can benefit large corporations that have teams of lawyers and compliance experts who can navigate complex rules. 'Startups and smaller companies are placed at a competitive disadvantage when more of these regulations are piled on,' Stevens explained. 'Whenever I see businesses embracing regulation, it always raises a red flag.'"
|
|
|
|
|
"Such proposals as the windfall profits tax are purely punitive, and because they have the effect of reducing national wealth and the size of the aggregate economy, the punishment will not be limited to the producers of fossil fuels."
– Benjamin Zycher,
American Enterprise Institute.
|
|
|
|
|
|