iN THE MEDIA
Windfool tax... In his fortnightly column for The Times, IEA Director General Mark Littlewood argued that further windfall taxes on energy profits would be a mistake. Mark wrote:
“Raking off an even larger share of energy industry profits has a number of obvious political attractions. Portraying a plan to increase government revenues as being no more than taking an extra slice from “greedy corporations” is an easier soundbite than increasing the basic rate of income tax.
Time's up... In The Spectator, Christopher Snowdon advocated an end to the annual October clock change. Christopher posited:
“One peculiarity of the current system is that the clocks go back seven weeks before the shortest day (21 December) but do not go forward until thirteen weeks after it. On the day before the clocks go back, the sun rises at 7:48 a.m. The day before they go forward, the sun rises at 5:52 a.m. This ludicrous imbalance, which makes March unnecessarily gloomy, has always existed but was made worse when the EU pushed daylight savings time back to the end of March. At the very least, the British government should consider moving it forward to February.”
News of the day... IEA Acting Director of Communications Emily Carver appeared on last Tuesday's BBC Politics Live to discuss the week's pressing issues, including the government's plans to reduce public spending and raise taxes. Watch the full episode here.
The great college swindle... IEA Communications Officer Harrison Griffiths wrote for CapX on proposals to reform the higher education funding system. Referencing the IEA’s new paper, 'Setting Universities Free', Harrison noted:
“As the report lays out, taxpayers are forced to pay the £19bn per year upfront cost of tuition fee subsidies, of which around half will never be paid back – a liability insured by future taxpayers. Does the current system deliver a strong return on that investment? I’m afraid not. As with so many areas of government spending, we have been the victims of daylight robbery.”
Channel chaos.... IEA Head of Public Policy Matthew Lesh wrote for City AM on the failure to tackle the increase in Channel crossings, which he argues risks undermining the positive case for immigration. Matthew wrote:
"The danger is that boat arrivals drive a new toxicity in public debate, not only about asylum seekers but also immigration more generally. If we want to maintain a generous immigration and humanitarian refugee programme, it is necessary and righteous to stop those dangerous, irregular routes."
Online censorship bill... Matthew also wrote for The Spectator reminding readers of the threat that the over-regulation of the internet poses to civil liberties. Matthew commented:
"The most concerning part of the Bill, perhaps counterintuitively, relates to illegal content. The Bill requires all digital platforms, from Twitter to Mumsnet, to proactively scan user speech for a wide array of prioritised content and censor it using automated systems. Shockingly, this duty even applies to encrypted private messaging services like WhatsApp and iMessage."
|