The Supreme Court stands poised to strike down racial preferences in college admissions
[link removed]
CounterCurrent:
If You Take a Skeleton to Court...
The Supreme Court stands poised to strike down racial preferences in college admissions
CounterCurrent is the National Association of Scholars’ weekly newsletter, bringing you the biggest issues in academia and our responses to them.
[link removed]
Category: Racial Preferences; Reading Time: ~2 minutes
------------------------------------------------------------
** Featured Article - "Race Consciousness Hangs by a Thread" by Wenyuan Wu ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Happy Halloween, CounterCurrent readers! Before the hordes of costume-clad children took to the streets yesterday, the skeleton in the closet of American higher education ([link removed]) enjoyed a long overdue moment in the spotlight.
The Supreme Court spent nearly five hours yesterday dissecting the arguments in the cases challenging the use of racial preferences in admissions at the University of North Carolina (UNC) and Harvard—and, in particular, the way that "holistic review" is used to systematically discriminate against Asian-American applicants. The Court’s decisions, which will be announced in 2023, have the potential to upend the admissions process at colleges and universities across the country.
The lower courts ruled against the petitioner, Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), in both cases based on the precedent in two major Supreme Court cases: Regents of the University of California v. Bakke ([link removed]) (1978) and Grutter v. Bollinger ([link removed]) (2003). These cases provided the legal foundation for the use of racial preferences in college admissions to achieve "the educational benefits that flow from a diverse student body," and they have propped up discriminatory admissions practices in American higher education for decades.
The SFFA cases reveal the fruit of these preferential policies. In the name of diversity, UNC and Harvard have used racial preferences to boost the admissions of "under-represented minorities," while penalizing more qualified applicants whose skin color doesn’t advance the university’s agenda. The findings ([link removed]) in the Harvard case are particularly shocking ([link removed]) : "an Asian-American applicant with a 25% chance of admissions would have a 35% chance if he were white, a 75% chance if he were Hispanic, and a 95% chance if he were black." In other words, an applicant’s chance of being accepted to his dream school could fall by a full seventy percent simply due to his skin color.
In this week’s featured article ([link removed]) , Minding the Campus columnist Wenyuan Wu explains why the SFFA cases will likely bring an end to the legal justification for such blatant discrimination. But even if UNC’s and Harvard’s admissions policies are struck down, that will not be the end of the story. As Wu writes,
The expected rulings will have ripple effects on the entire American education system, from K-12 to higher education. How can we reconcile the constitutionally ascribed principle of equal treatment and the national push for racial diversity? Will the pro tem, elitist bargain of race consciousness finally give way to the principled permanency of constitutional color blindness?
A decision striking down racial preferences in higher education would be a great victory for educational equality, but it is foolish to think that it would automatically bring an end to the practice. Racial preferences are deeply entrenched in American education, and both additional lawsuits ([link removed]) and targeted legislative actions ([link removed]) will likely be required to dismantle this discriminatory system. As we await the Supreme Court’s decision, now is the time to prepare for the next stage in the battle for fair admissions.
Nonetheless, the mere fact that SFFA had its day in court—and that the systematic discrimination against Asian-American students was at last brought before the public eye—is reason to celebrate. If all goes well, the other victories will come in time.
Until next week.
Marina Ziemnick
Communications Associate
National Association of Scholars
Read More ([link removed])
For more on racial preferences in American higher education:
[link removed]
May 03, 2022
** The Proof Is in the Data ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Marina Ziemnick
Administrators at elite universities rarely talk about their discrimination against Asian Americans. Instead, the proof of discrimination appears in the data.
[link removed]
January 25, 2022
** We'll See You in Court, After All ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Marina Ziemnick
The Supreme Court has propped up racial discrimination in this country for over four decades. It’s time for a new ruling to turn the tide.
[link removed]
January 24, 2022
** Anti-Asian Discrimination at the Heart of the Progressive Education Agenda ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Wenyuan Wu
A glaring skeleton in the closet of American education is its long-established discrimination against Asian Americans.
[link removed]
November 17, 2020
** Surprise! Americans Oppose Discrimination ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
John Rosenberg
When you spell out what "affirmative action" actually entails, Americans of every stripe vote against it. Race and sex preferences only pass when lawmakers obfuscate their true meaning.
** About the NAS
------------------------------------------------------------
The National Association of Scholars, founded in 1987, emboldens reasoned scholarship and propels civil debate. We’re the leading organization of scholars and citizens committed to higher education as the catalyst of American freedom.
============================================================
Follow NAS on social media.
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
| ** Join ([link removed])
| ** Renew ([link removed])
| ** Bookstore ([link removed])
Copyright © 2022 National Association of Scholars, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website, membership or donation forms, contact forms at events, or by signing open letters.
Our mailing address is:
National Association of Scholars
420 Madison Avenue
7th Floor
New York, NY 10017-2418
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
