* TALKING POINT, KRISTIAN NIEMIETZ
* SETTING UNIVERSITIES FREE
* iN THE MEDIA
* EPICENTER EXPANSION
* ENERGY CRISIS CONFERENCE
* IEA DIGITAL
* CALLING ALL STUDENTS!

Over the past couple of years, I have written a lot about how socialists always enthusiastically endorse socialist projects as long as they are popular, and then disown them as soon as they fall out of favour, now claiming that those projects were never “really” socialist to begin with.

In recent weeks, we saw what looked like a dramatic role reversal. Faced with the downfall of the short-lived Truss-Kwarteng government, it was disgruntled free-market liberals who suddenly started to sound suspiciously like socialists: the ideas were good – they were just terribly executed! Trussonomics has not “failed” – it just hasn’t been properly tried!

Have “Trussista-Kwartengistas” become the Corbynistas of the Right?

A lot of our opponents are making such comparisons. In my post-mortem of Trussonomics ([link removed]) , I ultimately reject this comparison, because it is a fundamentally false equivalence. There are gigantic qualitative differences in how liberals and socialists deal with real-world evidence, and own up to their mistakes.

I also wrote a piece on how the “eco-hooliganism” ([link removed]) of groups like Just Stop Oil, Insulate Britain and Extinction Rebellion has become a completely normalised daily feature of life. The article turned out to be a bit more topical than I was hoping it would be, because this week, Just Stop Oil activists targeted the offices ([link removed]) of our think tank friends at 55 Tufton Street, spraying gallons of paint all over the facade.

(The IEA itself was not directly impacted, presumably because these groups do not realise that even though we are often lumped together with the Tufton Street think tanks, we are not actually based there. Let’s keep it that way!)

Unpleasant and illiberal though this new eco-militancy is, it is nonetheless a cause célèbre. The eco-hooligans can count on the endorsement of the Guardian ([link removed]) , and political figures such as former opposition leader Jeremy Corbyn ([link removed]) . It is here to stay, and for better or worse, those of us on the free-market liberal side have to try to understand where this millenarian fanaticism comes from – if only to combat it more effectively.

Kristian Niemietz
IEA Head of Political Economy
SETTING UNIVERSITIES FREE

This week, the IEA published a new paper Setting Universities Free: How to deliver a sustainable student funding system ([link removed]) , by authors Peter Ainsworth, Managing Director at Consulting AM and Tom McKenzie, Professor of Economics at CBS International Business School.

[link removed]

The report argues that the university funding model is broken and needs fundamental reform.

The central problem, according to Ainsworth and McKenzie, is that universities are remunerated on the basis of how many students they can enrol, rather than on the basis of graduate outcomes. This incentivises the expansion of mass-market, low-quality courses that fail to prepare students for the workforce.

The paper proposes an alternative funding model in which the university’s income is contingent on future earnings, thus marrying the long-term interests of students with those of the university. This will make universities more responsive to student demands, while forcing them to consider the suitability of the courses they offer and the students they enrol. The proposal could also save the taxpayer £60 - £220bn over twenty years.
[link removed]

In a panel discussion for the IEA YouTube channel, IEA Communications Officer Harrison Griffiths spoke to the authors about the paper, which you can watch here ([link removed]) . You can also download the report for free here ([link removed]) .
iN THE MEDIA

A return to the status quo...? It has been a dizzying few weeks for British politics. Following the collapse of the Truss administration, Rishi Sunak is now our Prime Minister. Already we have seen that his election has calmed the financial markets, but the question remains, what direction will he take us in?

[link removed]

IEA Economics Fellow Julian Jessop wrote for iNews ([link removed]) welcoming the prospect of greater stability under new Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, but warned that he still faces significant economic challenges. Outlining these challenges, Julian wrote:

“The first and most immediate is to support households and businesses through the winter and beyond, as the UK joins other major economies in recession. This suggests that fiscal policy should be geared towards boosting incomes and confidence,”

[link removed]

In her fortnightly column for Conservative Home ([link removed]) , IEA Head of Media Emily Carver noted that while the Truss government made big mistakes (that were to prove fatal), the core argument that Truss made, that economic growth has been neglected and needs to be prioritised, is the right one.

Emily concluded that, despite the challenging circumstances, and the desire to steady the ship, it would be wrong for the new Prime Minister to reject his predecessor’s growth strategy wholesale.

[link removed]

For frack's sake... It was announced this week that the moratorium on fracking, lifted under the Truss administration, has now been reimposed by Rishi Sunak.

On GB News ([link removed]) , IEA Chief Operating Officer and Energy Analyst Andy Mayer discussed the recent behaviour of Just Stop Oil activists. In addition to criticising their vandalism, Andy explained the dangerous nature of their anti-fracking agenda, highlighting how such policies would keep energy costs high and could cost lives as a result. You can watch the interview here ([link removed]) .

[link removed]

Speaking on Times Radio ([link removed]) , Andy noted the short-sightedness of the decision, pointing out that since we will be reliant on gas for years to come, it makes economic and environmental sense to produce our own. Listen to the clip here ([link removed]) .

Andy was also widely quoted in the press, including in The Times ([link removed]) , The Express ([link removed]) and City AM ([link removed]) . Speaking to The Times ([link removed]) , Andy noted that:

“To rely on imported gas when we have 50 to 100 years supply under our feet is not a stance rooted in science or economics, but political weakness in the face of militant protest groups and anti-development campaigns"

EPICENTER EXPANSION

Our network of free market think tanks keeps expanding! Earlier this week, EPICENTER welcomed leading free market organisations of Germany and Slovakia to its network. Prometheus and INESS have been successfully changing the hearts and minds of Germans and Slovakians for over a decade.

With ten member think tanks and over a dozen partners, EPICENTER is ready to help tackle the challenges that Europe faces by providing non-partisan economic analysis and promoting the benefits of free markets and free societies across the continent.

To follow the work of our member think tanks, make sure to sign up to the EPICENTER newsletter here ([link removed]) .
[link removed]

As an educational charity, the work we do is entirely funded by donations. If you are able to help, please click here ([link removed]) or get in touch with our Development Director Angela Harbutt at [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]?body=Dear%20Angela%2C) . We thank you for your continued support.
And why not get Amazon to donate too?
All you have to do is to start shopping on [link removed] ([link removed]) and pick the Institute of Economic Affairs Limited as your chosen charity. The IEA will then receive 0.5% of your spending on most items. Everything else remains the same (and at no additional cost to you).
ENERGY CRISIS CONFERENCE

This month, IEA Energy Analyst Andy Mayer spoke on a panel with Bjørn Lomborg, author of the Sceptical Environmentalist and False Alarm, on the topic of energy security, at the second policy forum of the Global Liberty Institute in Switzerland.

After Bjorn set the scene with an exposition on real climate risks versus assumptions, Andy gave a UK perspective, highlighting the failure of successive British governments to consider the risks of an energy policy rooted in an ideological approach to Net Zero, and one that ignores the trade-offs with security and affordability.

He noted the danger of setting legally binding targets, and explained how the current crisis demonstrates what governments will do when these objectives collide. He also discussed the importance of carbon pricing, the economic value of doing it to internalise the externality of emissions, and the need to ensure such prices were consistent.

The day before the UK government reversed its fracking policy and reimposed a ban, Andy highlighted that it might take the energy crisis becoming much worse before many European governments get a grip and work towards a more pragmatic transition, that uses fossil fuels to pay for R&D into better climate solutions.
IEA DIGITAL

[link removed]

Swift Half with Snowdon... In this episode, IEA Head of Lifestyle Economics Christopher Snowdon sits down with Director of Volteface Paul North to discuss cannabis legalisation. Watch here ([link removed]) .

[link removed]

IEA Podcast... And, in this week's podcast, Matthew Lesh spoke to co-founder of London YIMBY John Myers about the state of UK housing policy and whether Sunak's government will lead the sector in a pro-growth direction. Watch here ([link removed]) .

CALLING ALL STUDENTS!

[link removed]

Monetary policy essay price... Applications remain open for the monetary policy essay prize, organised by the IEA, the Institute of International Monetary Policy Research and the Vinson Centre at the University of Buckingham.

This year's question is: Are the central banks to blame for the current inflation episode?

To be in with a chance of winning up to £500, you must submit your answer by 6 January 2023. Further details on how to enter can be found here ([link removed]) .

[link removed]

On Wednesday, we're hosting a Teacher Seminar at our Westminster office. The event will include presentations from IEA researchers on issues related to the academic syllabus. The focus will be on the history of economic thought, whether forecasting makes sense, and the history of the government debt crisis.

The event will take place on 2 November 2022 from 10am–3.30pm. You can find more information on how to sign up here ([link removed]) .

============================================================
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** LinkedIn ([link removed])

You are receiving this email from the Institute of Economic Affairs
** Unsubscribe ([link removed])
from this list.

© 2022 Institute of Economic Affairs
Institute of Economic Affairs 2 Lord North Street London, London SW1P 3LB United Kingdom

Registered in England 755502, Charity No. CC/235 351, Limited by Guarantee

** Forward ([link removed])
this email to a friend

This email was sent to [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
why did I get this? ([link removed]) unsubscribe from this list ([link removed]) update subscription preferences ([link removed])
Institute of Economic Affairs . 2 Lord North Street . London, London SW1P 3LB . United Kingdom