Last week, the German Federal Office for Justice announced that it had issued
two fines totaling €5.125 million against Telegram for failing to comply with
the country’s Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG), Germany’s online content
moderation law.





<[link removed]>
<[link removed]>



Tech & Terrorism: Germany Fines Telegram For Failing To Comply With Online
Content Moderation Law



(New York, N.Y.) — Last week, the German Federal Office for Justice announced
<[link removed]>
that it had issued two fines totaling €5.125 million against Telegram for
failing to comply with the country’s Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG),
Germany’s online content moderation law. The Federal Office revealed Telegram
failed to establish tools that would allow users to report illegal content and
failed to set up a legal entity in Germany to receive official communications.
Updates
<[link removed]>
made to NetzDG in 2021 require tech companies to improve their users’ ability
to report unlawful content. In Germany, large tech companies must remove
content that is ‘clearly illegal’—including terrorist content—within 24 hours
after it is reported by users.



While Telegram may appeal the fine, this action by the Federal Office is an
important milestone for the real-life enforcement and application of the law.
Earlier this year, German federal policewarned
<[link removed]>
that Telegram is becoming a “medium for radicalization.” Imposing a fine
demonstrates Germany’s commitment to holding tech companies accountable for
allowing illegal content to remain on their platform.



“The Counter Extremism Project (CEP) applauds the Federal Office for holding
Telegram accountable for failing to comply with laws that help reduce terrorist
and extremist content on its platform,” said CEP Executive Director David
Ibsen. “NetzDG narrowly targets content that is obviously illegal and that can
have very real and deadly consequences if not removed. With these fines, the
Federal Office is sending a strong message that tech companies cannot ignore
the law and that implementing stronger content moderation on their platforms is
in their financial and reputational interests.”



In 2018, CEP and the Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) authored a
joint report
<[link removed]>
on the performance of NetzDG. The law was predicted by critics to lead to
overreporting, therefore suppressing free speech, as well as the stifling of
innovation as smaller companies would not be able to absorb the cost of
resources needed to comply with the law. The CEP-CEPS report proved that these
arguments were baseless and the concerns unfounded. Six months after NetzDG’s
implementation, the law did not result in a flood of reports or over-blocking.
Furthermore, the study found that the expense of implementing NetzDG was
minimal at 1 percent of total revenue.



In 2020, CEP Germany released a follow-up NetzDG study
<[link removed]>
that tested the tech industry’s compliance with the law between January 31 and
February 14, 2020. The law in its current form requires online platforms to
remove “manifestly illegal” content within 24 hours only after it has been
reported by users. CEP’s study revealed that YouTube, Facebook, and Instagram
removed a mere 43.5 percent of clearly extremist and terrorist content, even
after that material was reported for its illegal nature under the NetzDG. CEP
Germany’s findings suggested that this “notice and takedown” method for
removing illegal content can only be effective if platforms are being searched
continuously and systemically for such material.



To read the CEP-CEPS’ joint report, Germany’s NetzDG: A Key Test For
Combatting Online Hate, please click here
<[link removed]>
.



To read the results of CEP Germany’s NetzDG study and the policy paper, please
clickhere
<[link removed]>
.



To read about the failings of social media companies’ “notice and takedown”
content moderation systems, please clickhere
<[link removed]>
.



###





Unsubscribe
<[link removed]>