Key First Amendment protections face challenges from Texas and Florida

View this email in your browser ([link removed])


** Dear friend of press freedom,
------------------------------------------------------------

Here are some of the most important stories we’re following from the U.S. and around the world. If you enjoy reading this newsletter, please forward it to friends and family. If someone has forwarded you this newsletter, please subscribe here ([link removed]) .
A Texas law that would force social media companies to host objectionable content is once again suspended while litigants request the Supreme Court weigh in on the issue. Last week the Fifth Circuit blocked the notorious legislation, known as H.B. 20, from taking effect until at least December, putting on hold its own controversial September ruling that seemingly disregards a century of First Amendment law ([link removed]) . The statute had previously made a trip to the Supreme Court, where an unusual 5-4 majority granted a request for an emergency stay ([link removed]) through its opaque “shadow docket” process.

The Texas law is one of a handful passed in Republican-led state legislatures ([link removed]) aimed at making social media platforms carry a variety of users’ opinions — whether those websites want to or not. In Florida, Gov. Ron DeSantis waded into the fray last May ([link removed]) with a similar law that has now been temporarily blocked by both a federal district court and the Eleventh Circuit. Earlier this month, Florida petitioned the Supreme Court to overturn that order ([link removed]) . Between these two petitions and the recently granted challenges ([link removed]) to CDA Section 230 (a key protection for online speech
([link removed]) ), this Supreme Court term could have major First Amendment implications.

The earlier Texas decision upholding H.B. 20 attempts to draw a legal distinction between the judgment exercised in social media moderation and that used by newspaper editors. But if legislators and courts can use this sort of blatantly unconstitutional law to dictate what social media companies must host, it’s not hard to imagine they’d try the same with news outlets next.

In fact, we’ve already seen the outlines of that effort, through campaigns to erode the First Amendment rights enshrined by cases like New York Times v. Sullivan ([link removed]) . Those rights were hard-fought, and far from inevitable. Although the Texas and Florida laws may have only an indirect impact on newsrooms for now, they represent an open front in an ongoing press freedom battle.


** What we’re reading:
------------------------------------------------------------
* David Kaye: Here’s what world leaders must do about spyware ([link removed]) : The former U.N. Special Rapporteur describes the problem with commercial spyware, which has been used to target journalists across the globe, and lays out a plan to curb its abuse.
* Gannett announces new cuts including mandatory unpaid leave and buyouts ([link removed]) : The largest newspaper chain in the United States continues to struggle financially, especially since a 2019 merger with GateHouse left the combined company saddled with $1 billion in debt. Yet they have no problem doing massive stock buybacks!
* Newspapers with a partisan aim filling the void of traditional media ([link removed]) : As local newspapers have reduced their coverage or disappeared altogether, outlets with a new model have stepped into the void in some political battleground states. Partisan publications with the trappings of traditional papers have resources and reach — and journalism educators are alarmed.
* KC photographer shoved to ground by NFL player after game ([link removed]) : Photographer Park Zebley was shoved to the ground by a Raiders wide receiver. Our U.S. Press Freedom Tracker confirmed with Zebley’s attorney that he suffered a headache, whiplash and a concussion from the incident. The player, Davante Adams, has been charged with misdemeanor assault. Follow our U.S. Press Freedom Tracker ([link removed]) for more.
* Journalists in US Moving Closer to Improved Legal Protections ([link removed]) : Two separate bills are making their way through Congress that would block federal law enforcement from subpoenaing media workers’ records and shield them against certain lawsuits.

Donate to support our work ([link removed])
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]

============================================================
Copyright © 2022 Freedom of the Press Foundation, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website.

Our mailing address is:
Freedom of the Press Foundation
49 Flatbush Ave, #1017
Brooklyn, NY 11217
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.