 |
 |
| Dear Friend, |
| It’s past time to address “double disasters” — hazardous chemical releases by industrial facilities that can be worsened by inadequate action in the face of climate change and natural disasters. Tell the Environmental Protection Agency to prevent chemical disasters today by finalizing critical new safeguards and reforming the Risk Management Program. |
| The EPA administers the Risk Management Program (RMP), which regulates industrial facilities that use, store, and/or manage highly hazardous chemicals. This program has a notorious history of failing to prevent serious chemical disasters — over 2,430 harmful incidents have occurred under the existing rules in the United States since 2004. |
| Recently, the EPA proposed a new rule which would reform the RMP. The RMP regulates about 11,760 chemical facilities, including chemical manufacturers, oil refineries, water treatment plants, industrial agriculture facilities, and pulp and paper mills. At least a third of these facilities are at high risk of exposure to wildfires, storm surges, flooding, and sea level rise — the severity of which is worsening dramatically as the climate changes. Yet, EPA’s current regulatory program neither directly addresses climate change nor requires these facilities to take any specific actions to protect people from the cascading effects of natural disaster-related chemical releases. If this new proposal becomes a regulation, it will require companies to assess climate risks and report on their plans for responding to a worst-case double disaster incident for the first time. |
| Workers and members of the public have been calling for meaningful reform for years. Fenceline communities — people who live near major industrial sites – have demanded government action to end the “second storm” of pollution. (Parras 2) |
| After Earthjustice won a case against the Trump-Pence administration for unlawfully delaying implementation of the 2017 Chemical Disaster Rule, the prior EPA responded by issuing a rollback of these important protections. Fortunately, the Biden-Harris administration has recognized the need to review and improve this program. New rules must do more than just restore the regulations from 2017 — it is essential to strengthen them.Take action today to show your support for the EPA’s proposal to reform the Risk Management Program to address chemical disasters and call for improvements to the proposal to ensure the strongest possible protections for workers, first-responders, and fenceline communities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sincerely,
Terry McGuire
Senior Legislative Representative
Healthy Communities Program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Earthjustice, 50 California Street, Suite 500, San Francisco, CA 94111 |
| About Us | Receive Less Email | Unsubscribe |
| This email was delivered to you by Earthjustice. |
| Photo Credits: A chemical fire burns at a facility during the aftermath of Hurricane Laura Thursday, Aug. 27, 2020, near Lake Charles, LA. (David J. Phillip) |
| Parras, Juan Preventing “Double Disasters”: How the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency can protect from hazardous chemical releases worsened by natural disasters Earthjustice, Center for Progressive Reform, Union of Concerned Scientists. 2021 |
| © 2022 |
|
|
