New NAS report details the ideological bias of America’s Middle East Studies Centers
[link removed]
CounterCurrent:
A Gulf in Our Middle East Studies
New NAS report details the ideological bias of America’s Middle East Studies Centers
CounterCurrent is the National Association of Scholars’ weekly newsletter, bringing you the biggest issues in academia and our responses to them.
[link removed]
Category: Foreign Influence; Reading Time: ~2 minutes
------------------------------------------------------------
** Featured Report - Hijacked: The Capture of America's Middle East Studies Centers by Neetu Arnold ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
More than fifty American college campuses are home to a Middle East or Islamic Studies Center. These centers go by different names—Georgetown University has the Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, for example, while its close neighbor George Mason University houses the AbuSulayman Center for Global Islamic Studies—but they all purport to educate students in the history, language, and culture of the Arab world.
In practice, many of these centers have adopted a different mission: advancing the gospel of progressive political ideology. The scholars at these centers spend their time bemoaning "Western oppression" and dismissing any criticism of Middle Eastern cultures or religions as biased. Issues such as the Israel–Palestine debate are recast as battles for "indigenous rights," while those who advocate for anything other than open borders are decried as xenophobic. To make matters worse, many of the centers are supported by taxpayer dollars—funds that were allocated to the centers due to their supposed relevance to America’s national security interests.
The National Association of Scholars’ new report Hijacked: The Capture of America’s Middle East Studies Centers ([link removed]) traces the rise and fall of these centers, illustrating how they came to shift their focus from policy-relevant research to politically motivated propaganda. The report provides eight case studies of centers at prominent universities and examines their curricula and programming, as well as their ties to foreign donors and governments.
NAS initiated this project as part of our continued effort to uncover foreign influence in American higher education and to reorient our universities toward the American national interest, rather than that of our adversaries. We first took on Chinese influence, exposing our seemingly innocuous Confucius Institutes in Outsourced to China ([link removed]) (2017) and their hidden-in-plain-sight replacements in After Confucius Institutes ([link removed]) (2022).
Now, Hijacked reveals the foreign funding sources that keep the lights on and the propaganda-machine running at many of America’s Middle East Studies Centers (MESCs). But what is even more concerning than the massive amounts of foreign funding flowing into MESCs is the fact that most of them engage in strong anti-American messaging regardless of their funding source. In fact, the report finds that "centers with little to no foreign involvement teach and research with the same extensive bias as those with significant foreign involvement" and that the most harmful materials produced by the centers are subsidized by the U.S. government, not foreign donors.
This doesn’t mean that foreign influence isn’t a concern at American MESCs; it simply means that they are further gone than we originally thought.
MESCs’ deep-rooted bias allows their foreign sponsors to remain hidden behind the scenes, confident that their interests will be advanced without their direct intervention. As report author Neetu Arnold explains ([link removed]) ,
It is no surprise that foreign governments and individuals fund these centers. But foreign sponsors rarely need to exercise active influence, for the faculty and staff willingly do their bidding unasked. Donors can thus take a hands-off approach, leaving almost no paper trail other than a dollar amount and a few signatures. The funding still serves their interests: continued production of biased material that promotes the political interests of the donors.
The solution, Arnold says, is not to dismantle MESCs or to eliminate area studies programs at American universities. It’s to reorient them toward their original purpose:
Serious changes must be made to restore the rigorous study of Islam and the Middle East. When Middle East studies returns to its roots, American students will receive the robust Middle East education that they desire—and that American taxpayers deserve.
The Middle East remains a key region for America’s national security interests, and its nations and peoples have a storied history worth studying. But as long as America’s Middle East Studies Centers are more interested in advancing their ideological agenda than promoting meaningful scholarship and instruction, they are not deserving of our taxpayer dollars.
Until next week.
Marina Ziemnick
Communications Associate
National Association of Scholars
P. S. Be sure to read Arnold’s op-ed on National Resource Centers ([link removed]) published yesterday in the Wall Street Journal.
Read More ([link removed])
For more on foreign influence in American higher education:
[link removed]
September 14, 2022
** Outsourced to Qatar ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Neetu Arnold
This case study of Northwestern University's Qatari branch campus reveals how Qatar uses partnerships with American universities to advance its own interests and values.
[link removed]
June 21, 2022
** Give Me That Old-Time Infiltration ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Marina Ziemnick
Two new reports from the National Association of Scholars show how universities attempt to hide foreign influence on campus.
[link removed]
June 15, 2022
** After Confucius Institutes ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Rachelle Peterson, Flora Yan, and Ian Oxnevad
A new report from NAS finds that colleges and universities continue to host Chinese-funded programs similar to Confucius Institutes under new names even after public and legislative scrutiny.
[link removed]
March 29, 2022
** The Middle East Studies Association Betrays Academia ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Carl Salzman
The Middle East Studies Association has jettisoned academic impartiality and the quest for truth in favor of political partisanship and extremist activism.
** About the NAS
------------------------------------------------------------
The National Association of Scholars, founded in 1987, emboldens reasoned scholarship and propels civil debate. We’re the leading organization of scholars and citizens committed to higher education as the catalyst of American freedom.
============================================================
Follow NAS on social media.
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
| ** Join ([link removed])
| ** Renew ([link removed])
| ** Bookstore ([link removed])
Copyright © 2022 National Association of Scholars, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website, membership or donation forms, contact forms at events, or by signing open letters.
Our mailing address is:
National Association of Scholars
420 Madison Avenue
7th Floor
New York, NY 10017-2418
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
