October 8, 2022

Read in Browser [[link removed]]

POWERED BY

I’m Amanda Christovich, FOS’ resident college sports reporter. Concussions in the NFL have resurfaced in the public conversation after Miami Dolphins quarterback Tua Tagovailoa suffered two gruesome hits — and an NFLPA investigation ensued over whether the team mishandled concussion protocol. It’s the latest of multiple reckonings the NFL has faced on concussions.

The NCAA, however, has not had its day in court. But that’s about to change next week. A jury will decide whether the NCAA is liable for the death of a player who suffered repeated head trauma while playing football at USC — and who was posthumously diagnosed with CTE.

Have thoughts? Reply to this newsletter or drop me a line on Twitter [[link removed]].

The NCAA Is Going To Trial Over Traumatic Brain Injuries [[link removed]]

USC

A jury has never ruled on whether the NCAA is liable for negligent concussion protocol — whether it has failed to protect athletes from concussions, traumatic brain injuries, lifelong illness, and even death.

The NCAA has faced a handful of lawsuits in the past decade from athletes who endured long-term injuries stemming from concussions, but the cases have all been dismissed or settled. One made it to trial but was settled three days in.

That’s about to change. Next week, pre-trial proceedings will begin in Los Angeles Superior Court for the case Alana Gee v. NCAA.

Gee is the widow of former USC linebacker Matthew Gee, who played between 1988-92. Gee died in 2018 — and was subsequently diagnosed with CTE. Alana Gee is alleging wrongful death and negligence, saying the NCAA failed to educate Matthew Gee on the dangers of concussions — of which it was well aware — and failed to protect Gee from them.

The trial will span multiple weeks and will feature a star-studded witness list — from NCAA officials like President Mark Emmert and General Counsel Scott Bearby to concussion-era celebrities like Dr. Bennet Omalu (the doctor whom the film “Concussion” was based on). The trial will also be livestreamed [[link removed]].

Experts told Front Office Sports that if the NCAA loses, it would potentially owe hundreds of millions in damages and face a deluge of future concussion lawsuits — just like the NFL.

“This trial will begin to shed a light on the NCAA’s wrongful conduct, and we believe that light will only get brighter as hundreds more former NCAA football players finally begin getting their days in court,” Todd Logan, a partner at Edelson PC who is prosecuting the case, told Front Office Sports.

The NCAA did not respond to a request for comment for this story, though it denies allegations in court documents.

The Tragedy of Matthew Gee

Matthew Gee never played in the NFL but was a major contributor to a successful USC team in the late 1980s and early 1990s. After his playing days ended in 1992, he lived a “relatively normal” life — until five years before his passing, according to the original complaint filed in Nov. 2020.

In 2013, Gee began to experience confusion, rage, and depression.

One harrowing detail: “In March 2018, he reported to a physician that long periods — even days — sometimes went by without his having any memory of what had happened.”

He died on Dec. 31, 2018 in his sleep at age 49, according [[link removed]] to the Concussion Foundation. Gee, who had previously been sober, had alcohol in his blood at the time of his death. He was posthumously diagnosed with CTE.

The suit argues that Gee’s death resulted from the repeated head trauma he suffered while playing for USC. It says the NCAA is responsible.

“For decades, Defendant NCAA knew about the debilitating long-term dangers of concussions, concussion-related injuries, and sub-concussive injuries … that resulted from playing college football, but recklessly disregarded this information to protect the very profitable business of ‘amateur’ college football,” the complaint said.

“Defendant failed to implement adequate procedures to protect Gee from the long-term dangers associated with them. It did so knowingly and for profit.”

In court documents, the NCAA thoroughly denied all allegations.

Gee must have “assumed the risk” of playing football when he stepped onto the field, the NCAA said.It noted that NCAA bylaws make clear schools are liable for any mishandling of injuries, not the national office.As part of its legal defense, the NCAA also said it has not made football more dangerous.

“Collegiate football was not a substantial cause of Gee’s death,” the NCAA wrote.

The NCAA’s Potential Culpability

Sports attorney Dan Lust, who has years of experience with personal injury cases, told FOS that an NCAA loss “could be a watershed moment for college sports.”

The NCAA would face two major consequences: massive financial liability and a flood of future lawsuits.

Lust noted Gee’s attorneys are asking not only for damages, but also “disgorgement:” giving back the profits it earned as a result of negligence. That’s hundreds of millions in potential liability — plus the legal fees and additional damages from future lawsuits.

But there’s no guarantee the NCAA will lose, of course.

“I think everyone’s going to agree, whether you’re the NFL or the NCAA, that more should be done to prevent head trauma and concussions, and the harm that’s been caused,” Lust said. “There is likelihood of a finding of negligence, that the NCAA should be doing more for concussions. But you’re still going to have to prove causation.”

The jury must agree Gee’s CTE resulted from playing college football and that it led to his death. Then, it must agree that the medical problems Gee suffered resulted from the NCAA’s alleged negligence — rather than the actions of USC or the then Pac-10.

Lust pointed to Brenner v. NCAA [[link removed]], which was tried in Oregon this past spring. Former Oregon offensive lineman Doug Brenner sued the governing body for an injury he incurred during practice in January 2017. A jury found the NCAA to be negligent — but that wasn’t enough to prove it caused his injury.

If history is any indicator, though, the case’s geography could work in Alana Gee’s favor. California is a traditionally hostile environment to the NCAA.

The Alston case, which found [[link removed]] the NCAA illegally restricted educational benefits, and the O’Bannon case, which found athletes should be compensated for NIL rights, both went through the Ninth Circuit Court in California. State legislatures also passed the nation’s first-ever state NIL law.

The Future of NCAA Concussion Protocol

Last week, “the whole nation saw what happened to Tua,” Ramogi Huma, the executive director of the National College Players Association and a decades-long advocate for college athlete safety reforms, told FOS. “That happens on the regular in college sports.”

The NCAA’s current protocols, after all, are only slightly more sophisticated than they were during Gee’s era.

The verdict could spur significant change. If the NCAA is found liable for negligent concussion protocols, it could be incentivized to improve them — and maybe even enforce them — in order to protect itself.

By now, the NCAA has funded research and provided medically based suggestions for how to better protect athletes. Since 2010, it has required that each school implement a concussion protocol, Huma said. But it only gives suggestions for what that protocol should entail. In January, the NCAA ratified a new constitution [[link removed]] that largely leaves this structure in place.

In practice, this program is weak at best. When a trainer attempts to follow protocol, for example, there’s often pressure to eschew it. In 2015, a survey [[link removed]] of 789 NCAA athletic trainers and 111 team physicians found that 64.4% of athletes and 53.7% of coaches pressured trainers to “prematurely clear [athletes] to return to participation after a concussion.”

If a school violates its own rules, the NCAA currently has no enforcement mechanism to punish it. Huma went so far as to call the concussion protocols “voluntary.” He noted there are also no outside watchdogs to investigate — no player’s union, no federal legislation.

The controversy over how to handle concussions — and the question of the NCAA’s role in protecting athletes from them — will not end with this case. If Gee wins, the floodgates open. But if she loses, there are more cases to be tried — and potentially other parties, like the schools, who could be held responsible.

“This lawsuit is not a one-off,” Huma said. “It’s not something that used to happen and got cleaned up.”

SPONSORED BY INVESCO QQQ

Quarterbacking for the Community

This college football season, Invesco QQQ [[link removed]] is recognizing players who are innovating off the field – just as Invesco QQQ offers access to game-changing Nasdaq-100 companies in one exchange-traded fund (ETF).

Chase Griffin is the quarterback for the UCLA Bruins and one of college football’s most impactful athletes. By leveraging his personal values and marketing appeal, Griffin has enlisted major partners to co-invest in community organizations.

Griffin’s BE11EVE campaign has donated enough for 60K+ meals to the Los Angeles Regional Food bank. He calls his approach #NILFORGOOD because it not only establishes a model for economic value creation for athletes and brands, but also provides enormous impact in the community.

Learn more [[link removed]] about how you can become an agent of innovation with Invesco QQQ, the Official ETF of the NCAA.*

Refer Friends, Win Merch

Ready to rep your favorite newsletter? Refer your friends and colleagues to Front Office Sports and you could win FOS merchandise.

It’s easy to spread the word. Copy and paste your unique link below and share it in an email or on your timeline.

Your custom referral link:

[link removed] [[link removed]]

Or use these one-tap sharing methods:

Email [[link removed]] Twitter [[link removed]] Facebook [[link removed]]

Your referral count: 0

Disclaimer

*Invesco is not affiliated with Chase Griffin or the UCLA Bruins.

NOT FDIC INSURED | MAY LOSE VALUE | NO BANK GUARANTEE

There are risks involved with investing in ETFs, including possible loss of money. ETFs are subject to risks similar to those of stocks. Investments focus in a particular sector, such as technology, are subject to greater risks and are more greatly impacted by market volatility, than more diversified investments. The Nasdaq-100 Index includes the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq. An investment cannot be made directly into an index.

NCAA is a trademark of the National Collegiate Athletic Association. Invesco is not affiliated with the NCAA.

Before investing, consider the Fund’s investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. Visit invesco.com [[link removed]] for a prospectus with this information. Read it carefully before investing.

Invesco Distributors, Inc.

If this email was forwarded to you, you can subscribe here [[link removed]].

Written by Amanda Christovich [[link removed]] Edited by Peter Richman [[link removed]]

MORE FROM FRONT OFFICE SPORTS:

The Leadoff [[link removed]] - Daily business of sports podcast

Front Office Sports Pro [[link removed]] - The most promising opportunities where sports meets industry

Front Office Sports Learning [[link removed]] - Professional education at the speed of culture

Copyright © 2022 Front Office Sports. All rights reserved.

80 Pine Street Suite 3202 New York, NY 10005

Advertise [[link removed]] / Update your preferences [link removed] / Unsubscribe [link removed]