This Issue: Federal appellate courts rule on both DACA and OPT

Fri, Oct. 7th

Two separate federal district courts issued rulings this week impacting the future of the DACA executive amnesty for illegal aliens who were brought to the country under the age of 16 and the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program that allows foreign students to stay and work in the United States after graduating from a U.S. college.

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the stay placed on DACA by Texas federal judge Andrew Hanen. The stay prevents the Biden Administration from processing new DACA applications, but allows it to continue processing renewals for the approximately 600,000 DACA amnesty recipients.

The court did side with the lower court's ruling that DACA is unlawful:

DACA creates a new class of otherwise removable aliens who may obtain lawful presence, work authorization, and associated benefits. Congress determined which aliens can receive these benefits, and it did not include DACA recipients among them. We agree with the district court's reasoning and its conclusions that the DACA Memorandum contravenes comprehensive statutory schemes for removal, allocation of lawful presence, and allocation of work authorization. DACA fails at step one of Chevron.

However, it stopped short of ending DACA altogether and instead sent it back to the lower court for review. This is because the Biden Administration published a final rule on DACA back in August that is set to take effect on October 31. The new rule expands and doubles down on DACA and fails to address the concerns raised by the courts, so we're hopeful that the lower court will also strike down the rule.

D.C. court rules OPT is legal

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against a coalition of tech workers who are pushing to end the Optional Practical Training program.

The program allows federal students who graduate from a U.S. institution of higher learning to stay and work in the country upon graduation for a set period of time. It's often used as a stepping stone for foreign STEM graduates to an H-1B visa.

OPT undercuts American workers, particularly recent college graduates with degrees in STEM. Since OPT workers are in the U.S. on an F-1 student visa, employers are not required to pay the 7.65% payroll tax, making OPT workers cheaper than American workers. Further, the OPT worker must remain with the employer or risk losing legal status.

The tech workers claimed that OPT is illegal because its current version was created by the executive branch during the second Bush Administration and has not been authorized by Congress. The D.C.-based court ruled that its legal because Congress did not specifically forbid it.

You can read our legal analyst Jared Culver's take on the ruling here. We've also posted new actions on your Action Board, urging your Members of Congress to terminate OPT.