This was how much they were prepared to spend, not how much they actually did
7 Oct 2022 | Full Fact's weekly news
View in your browser ([link removed])
FACT CHECK
The Bank of England hasn’t spent £65bn ‘to prop up the markets’
You may well have seen claims over the past week, that the Bank of England spent £65bn to support the UK economy. We’ve seen this being said by journalists, high profile social media users and a Labour MP. But it’s not true.
This figure stems from a statement saying the Bank was prepared to spend £5bn buying bonds every weekday between September 28th and October 14th. If they did spend this maximum amount of £5bn in each of those 13 weekdays, it would total £65bn.
But just because they were prepared to spend this much, that doesn’t mean they did. It’s not yet the 14th of October, but we already know it won’t be as much as £65bn. The Bank spent £3.7bn over the first five days of the operation. This is a lot less than the £25bn maximum amount they were prepared to spend.
How much has the Bank spent? ([link removed])
FACT CHECKS
The Conservative Conference ([link removed])
We’ve been scrutinising claims being made at the Conservative party conference in Birmingham, which wrapped up this week.
Liz Truss gave the keynote speech, covering the government’s recent policy announcements and talking about her upbringing, the economic climate, healthcare and more. We looked at five claims in detail:
Liz Truss: fact checked ([link removed])
Also speaking at the conference was chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng, who claimed that Labour had left government with “record unemployment”. That’s not right.
Labour left government in May 2010 when the UK unemployment rate was 7.9%. It rose further to a peak of 8.5% a year later, with 2.7 million people unemployed.
But this was not a record. Unemployment was higher for most of the 1980s, reaching a peak of 11.9% in 1984. It was also higher in 1992. And current records only go back fifty years, so we can’t compare to any time before 1971.
Unemployment through the years ([link removed])
FACT CHECK
** Treasury delete tweet about 'typical' first-time buyer’s savings ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
We've received questions from a number of readers about a (now-deleted) tweet shared by the Treasury promoting its recent policy announcements in the mini-Budget.
Posted on 29 September, it said: “Thanks to the Growth Plan, a typical first-time buyer in London moving into a representative terraced house will save £11,250 on stamp duty & £1,050 on the household's energy bills—and if they earn £30,000 almost an additional £400 on tax. This is around £12,700 in total.”
The figures themselves are accurate, but would appear to be based on a very specific set of assumptions about the profile of the hypothetical “first-time buyer”, who appears not to be “typical” in a variety of important ways.
Why it was deleted ([link removed])
MORE FACT CHECKS
Also this week...
* No evidence small boat arrivals beat NHS waiting lists ([link removed])
* Article on impact of voice assistants on children is not ‘new research’ ([link removed])
* Queen’s funeral was not cover-up for planning global recession ([link removed])
Read our latest fact checks ([link removed])
Stop the spread of bad information
Find these updates useful? We'd be incredibly grateful if you could share our fact checks and help more people access good information.
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]'t%20spent%20%C2%A365bn%20'to%20prop%20up%20the%20markets'%20-%20via%20%40FullFact:&utm_source=Full+Fact+Newsletter&utm_campaign=18a7c25a6f-Truss+Energy+figures+-+Newsletter+30+Sep_COPY_02&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_af27c25bd1-18a7c25a6f-170028597 https%3A%2F%2Ffullfact.org%2Feconomy%2Fbank-of-england-65-billion-gilts-mini-budget%2F Tweet ([link removed]'t%20spent%20%C2%A365bn%20'to%20prop%20up%20the%20markets'%20-%20via%20%40FullFact:&utm_source=Full+Fact+Newsletter&utm_campaign=18a7c25a6f-Truss+Energy+figures+-+Newsletter+30+Sep_COPY_02&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_af27c25bd1-18a7c25a6f-170028597 https%3A%2F%2Ffullfact.org%2Feconomy%2Fbank-of-england-65-billion-gilts-mini-budget%2F)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
[link removed]'t%20spent%20%C2%A365bn%20'to%20prop%20up%20the%20markets'%20-%20via%20%40FullFact&utm_source=Full+Fact+Newsletter&utm_campaign=18a7c25a6f-Truss+Energy+figures+-+Newsletter+30+Sep_COPY_02&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_af27c25bd1-18a7c25a6f-170028597 Share ([link removed]'t%20spent%20%C2%A365bn%20'to%20prop%20up%20the%20markets'%20-%20via%20%40FullFact&utm_source=Full+Fact+Newsletter&utm_campaign=18a7c25a6f-Truss+Energy+figures+-+Newsletter+30+Sep_COPY_02&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_af27c25bd1-18a7c25a6f-170028597)
All the best,
Team Full Fact
============================================================
** Follow us ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
** Like us ([link removed])
** Follow us ([link removed])
Have any questions or feedback? Please ** get in touch via our contact form ([link removed])
. We do not respond to direct replies to this email address.
Find out ** how Full Fact is funded ([link removed])
.
Copyright © Full Fact 2022 - All rights reserved
A registered charity (no. 1158683) and a non-profit company (no. 6975984) limited by guarantee and registered in England and Wales.
Our mailing address is:
17 Oval Way, London, SE11 5RR
We use Mailchimp to send you our emails and to see which articles are most popular. ** Read our privacy policy ([link removed])
or ** Mailchimp's privacy policy ([link removed])
** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
** update subscription preferences ([link removed])
