From Harold Meyerson, The American Prospect <[email protected]>
Subject Meyerson on TAP: 1-2-3-4; We Don’t Want Your F---ing War!
Date September 27, 2022 8:08 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
The Latest from the Prospect
 ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

View this email in your browser

 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2022

Meyerson on TAP

1-2-3-4; We Don't Want Your F---ing War!

Ukraine, Vietnam, and the Necessity of Draft Evasion

It's been less than a week since Vladimir Putin announced he was
calling up 300,000 fellow Russians to fight his war in Ukraine, but on
Monday, just five days after his speech, the independent newspaper

**Novaya Gazeta**, citing government sources, reported that 261,000
Russian men had fled the country. Today's

**New York Times** reports

that the line of cars at Russia's border with Georgia stretches 12.5
miles.

Credit where credit is due: Putin has accomplished in less than a week
what it took years for Presidents Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon to
do-drive young men across the border (in that case, Canadian) rather
than fight an immoral and failing war.

It's too early to pronounce Ukraine to be Russia's Vietnam, not
least because Afghanistan was already, at least in part, Russia's
(well, the Soviet Union's) Vietnam. But far more than Brezhnev's
Afghan Adventure, Putin's Ukrainian war has outraged public opinion
across the planet and, apparently, now that he's instituted
conscription, within Russia's borders as well. (The fact that Ukraine
is virtually European and its residents overwhelmingly white-as
Afghanistan and Afghans were not-factors into that.) Neither is it yet
clear that Russia will eventually be forced to withdraw from Ukraine, as
the U.S. was from Vietnam.

Nonetheless, Russia is now going through something that Americans of a
certain age-most particularly, those who were draft-age men in the
years 1965 to 1972-should remember well. I was one of them, and I
certainly do.

In some particulars, Russia's turn to conscription echoes ours. Putin
has made clear that he's not calling up the young male techies and
professionals whom he clearly doesn't wish to estrange (or lose to
cross-border flight)-much as the U.S., during the Vietnam years,
extended 2-S draft deferments to college students. That only tends to
increase the anger, then as now, of the young men and their families
excluded from the elite's immunity to war (in our nation, a phenomenon
dating back to the Civil War, when a $300 payment to the government
bought you out of having to serve).

Putin's draft also echoes instances in Russia's not-all-that-distant
czarist past-most especially, using the draft to afflict the groups
viewed as the regime's current or potential enemies, and the groups
with the least power to resist. Today's Russian conscription has
landed most heavily on the nation's non-urban, non-Russian minorities,
as well as on men arrested for protesting the war. Such was also the
case in Czar Nicholas's 1904-1905 war against Japan, in which the
draft was particularly aimed at the nation's least politically
powerful population: the Jews, whose rate of border-crossing (in most
cases, all the way to Ellis Island) accelerated correspondingly. In
1905, the combination of the draft, the high death rate, and the defeat
at Japan's hands contributed to that year's revolution-something
that Putin assumes his control of state media and his neo-Cossack
security forces will render impossible.

In the Vietnam-era U.S., relatively few war opponents or reluctants
actually had to cross over to Canada. The 2-S was just one of a raft of
deferment possibilities, and an entire cottage industry of draft
counselors, attorneys, and the occasional physician arose to keep young
men far from Vietnam. We were, as Russia emphatically is not, a liberal
society, deliberately pocked with loopholes that gave legal outs to
those who could afford them. That made conscription largely
economic-and it became much more economic when the massive opposition
to the war convinced policymakers (Nixon in particular) to shift the
armed forces to an all-volunteer basis. Just

**how**economic our de facto but not de jure conscription currently has
become was made clear in a congressional hearing

last week, when the Army noted that it's falling far short of its
enlistment quotas due to a record number of private-sector job openings
and the wage increases that the labor shortage has compelled employers
to adopt.

For those of us who both opposed and sought to evade fighting in the
Vietnam War, the current flight and anti-war stance of young Russian men
inevitably brings back memories. At the turn of the millennium, when I
worked for the

**L.A. Weekly**, I used the occasion of that supposedly landmark new
year's passage to write about the one New Year's Eve (1971-1972)
when my college roommate and I managed to get out of the draft, which
loomed over us more than it did most. Here's a link
to that piece, which I
include along with my hope that my newfound Russian counterparts-if
need be, in the millions-make it across the border.

~ HAROLD MEYERSON

Follow Harold Meyerson on Twitter

[link removed]

Why Progressive Groups Struggled With the Biden Agenda

The way Build Back Better unfolded made it an insider's game, wasting
serious effort and hundreds of millions of dollars from outside
organizations. BY DAVID DAYEN

[link removed]
Can the Democrats Win Back Rural Voters?

Their success in 2022 and the long term will depend on it. Here are some
hopeful developments on that front. BY ROBERT KUTTNER

[link removed]
Claiming Victory, Boston Starbucks Workers Call Off 64-Day Strike

The first open-ended strike in Starbucks Workers United history led to
the replacement of the store's manager. BY SAURAV SARKAR

Donate to TAP's Midterm Tracker Travel Fund

to send our reporters to cover elections around the country. You can
tell us where to go, too!  

Your 100% tax-deductible donation goes directly to the editorial team to
cover expenses for reporting and travel.
Thank you for your support!  

[link removed]

 

To receive this newsletter directly in your inbox, click here to
subscribe. 

Click to Share this Newsletter

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

YOUR TAX DEDUCTIBLE DONATION SUPPORTS INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM

The American Prospect, Inc.
1225 I Street NW, Suite 600
Washington, DC xxxxxx
United States
Copyright (c) 2022 The American Prospect. All rights reserved.

To opt out of American Prospect membership messaging, click here
.

To manage your newsletter preferences, click here
.

To unsubscribe from all American Prospect emails, including newsletters,
click here
.
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis