This is the Daily Media Update published by the Institute for Free Speech. For press inquiries, please contact [email protected].  
Congress
 
By Trevor Hunnicutt and Alexandra Alper
.....U.S. President Joe Biden on Tuesday made a plea for Congress to pass a bill that would require super PACs and certain other groups to disclose donors who contributed $10,000 or more during an election cycle, a measure doomed to fail due to lack of Republican support...
The measure is slated for a Senate vote this week, top Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer said on Monday, as Democrats seek to boost election transparency ahead of the November midterms after failing to pass more ambitious voting rights legislation earlier this year.
The legislation does not have the support of 60 senators necessary to overcome the Senate's vote threshold for ending debate.
.....The DISCLOSE Act would unnecessarily force exposure of donor information, threaten individual liberties and violate freedom of speech.
Anonymous participation is a critical element of our political process. Many transformative ideas and just causes, unpopular or controversial in their time, relied on anonymous arguments to the ultimate benefit of us all—from the abolition of slavery to the fight for Civil Rights. The DISCLOSE Act eliminates the ability to participate in the political process as the Founders intended, free from intimidation or harm.
The Courts
 
By Robert Barnes and Ann E. Marimow 
.....Conflicting lower court rulings about removing controversial material from social media platforms point toward a landmark Supreme Court decision on whether the First Amendment protects Big Tech’s editorial discretion or forbids its censorship of unpopular views.
.....N.C. Attorney General Josh Stein’s latest filing in the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals makes the case for declaring a 91-year-old state law unconstitutional. The law creates a misdemeanor crime for people who lie about candidates in election campaigns.
A split 4th Circuit panel already voted, 2-1, to give Stein a temporary win in the case. The panel agreed on Aug. 23 to block Wake County District Attorney Lorrin Freeman’s office from using the law to bring indictments against Stein and his associates.
That decision could end up saving Stein and other plaintiffs from prosecution. The statute of limitations in the case could run out next month. The Appeals Court is scheduled to hear arguments in Stein’s lawsuit in December.
By Dara Kam, News Service of Florida
.....A federal judge on Monday refused to dismiss a lawsuit filed by suspended Hillsborough County State Attorney Andrew Warren but also rejected the Democrat’s request for a preliminary injunction to block the suspension by Gov. Ron DeSantis, saying the public wouldn’t be served by “yo-yoing” prosecutors.
The Media
 
By Timothy P. Carney
.....In 2022, billionaire Yvon Chouinard gave his company to a liberal nonprofit organization called the Holdfast Collective, which can use its money to fund politicians and political causes.
The fallout is that the group will have a $3 billion business to fund its lobbying, politics, and maybe conservation efforts. Chouinard managed to give away his fortune without having to pay taxes on the transfer.
You see, had Chouinard sold the company, he would have paid taxes on its increase in value, and thus he would have had less to give to the group he now controls.
This, the New York Times tells us, heralds “a new form of capitalism” with actual commitment to “making the world a better place.” ...
So, what’s the difference between these two transactions? Why is Seid's money “dark money,” and Chouinard's money “philanthropy”?
Online Speech Platforms

By Stewart Baker
.....The NY Post today makes a troubling claim, attributed to FBI whistleblowers -- that without probable cause Facebook has given the FBI the private posts of conservatives upset about the 2020 election, triggering numerous investigations.
The Post article offers some compelling details. My favorite is the agents' complaint that the project produced a very large volume of data about people who weren't really threats, thus wasting investigative resources. If you want to inspire FBI agents to discover their inner civil libertarian and blow the whistle on a surveillance program, nothing does the job better than giving them lots of intrusive but unproductive make-work.
But as the story is written, it has one big problem. The conduct it describes would violate the law in a way that neither the FBI nor Facebook would likely be comfortable doing. Federal law mostly prohibits electronic service providers from voluntarily supplying customer data to the government.
What's more, Facebook has issued a denial. A very careful denial.
By Elizabeth Dwoskin and Jeremy B. Merrill 
.....The 2020 election and its turbulent aftermath fueled a powerful generation of online influencers, a Washington Post data analysis has found, producing sky-high follower counts for an array of conservatives who echoed Trump’s false claims of election fraud, known as the “big lie.” Some doubled or tripled their audiences on Twitter, while others saw even larger gains — catapulting, like Becker, from relative obscurity to online fame.
The States
 
By David Ardia
.....This is part II in a series of posts discussing First Amendment Limits on State Laws Targeting Election Misinformation, 20 First Amend. L. Rev. 291 (2022). What follows is an excerpt from the article (minus the footnotes, which you will find in the full PDF).
Despite public outcry over the rise of misinformation in political campaigns, there is little federal regulation of the content of election-related speech...
The states, however, have not held back.
By Marianne Goodland
.....The Colorado Court of Appeals has ruled that a lawsuit by a former legislator alleging malicious prosecution by the Public Trust Institute and its former director can move forward.
The ruling came with a first-ever determination that an administrative proceeding, which could form the basis for a malicious prosecution claim, must be "quasi-judicial." In this case, that applies to the Colorado Independent Ethics Commission and the Colorado Secretary of State's elections division, which handles lobbying and other complaints.
What led to the lawsuit were complaints that Suzanne Staiert and PTI filed with both the Secretary of State's office and the Colorado Independent Ethics Commission. The complaint with the Secretary of State alleged Joe Salazar, who served three terms in the Colorado House but decided in 2018 to run for Attorney General, engaged in lobbying in 2019 without registering as a lobbyist. The ethics complaint claimed Salazar violated a provision in Amendment 41, the state ethics law, that bans former lawmakers from lobbying for two years after they leave office.
By Morgan Lee
.....A New Mexico politician and Trump supporter who was removed and barred from elected office for his role in the U.S. Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021, is attempting to appeal that decision to the state Supreme Court.
Cowboys for Trump cofounder and former county commissioner Couy Griffin on Tuesday notified the high court of his intent to appeal.
Read an article you think we would be interested in? Send it to Tiffany Donnelly at [email protected]. For email filters, the subject of this email will always begin with "Institute for Free Speech Media Update."  
The Institute for Free Speech is a nonpartisan, nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization that promotes and defends the First Amendment rights to freely speak, assemble, publish, and petition the government. Please support the Institute's mission by clicking here. For further information, visit www.ifs.org 
Follow the Institute for Free Speech