Seal________________________________________________________________________




*FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE*

September 16, 2022

www.texasattorneygeneral.gov




*PRESS OFFICE: (512) 463-2050*

[email protected]





?

*Paxton Joins Amicus Brief to Rein in Unconstitutional Federal Power,*?

*Encourages U.S. Supreme Court to Curtail Excessive Agency Deference?*?

?

AUSTIN ??Attorney General Paxton has joined an Oklahoma-led cert-stage amicus brief in the U.S. Supreme Court, challenging a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that extended excessive deference to federal agencies. Under the doctrine known as "Cassell" deference, the D.C. Circuit frequently rules that courts will not second-guess a federal agency?s decision to depart from its own precedents, without any need to explain its reasoning.?

??

The D.C. Circuit receives the lion?s share of agency-review cases, but its excessive deference to bureaucratic agencies is misplaced. Although judicial deference to agency determinations can sometimes be appropriate, the "Cassell "doctrine enables federal agencies not only to set their own scope of power and create legal precedents, but also to re-interpret those precedents at will without any meaningful judicial review. This effectively turns agencies into a fourth branch of government unaccountable to constitutional checks and balances.?

??

In the specific case at hand, "NGL Supply Whole v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)", FERC likely succeeded only because the D.C. Circuit liberally interpreted and applied the doctrine. The brief highlights this fact: ?In short, the FERC prevailed by being conclusory in its analysis and leaving the D.C. Circuit to do the real work under "Cassell" deference.??

??

The amicus brief does not opine on the merits of this specific case, but rather encourages the Supreme Court to apply its more recent precedents to rein in the D.C. Circuit?s excessive deference under "Cassell": ?This amicus is solely opposed to the D.C. Circuit?s continued deference doctrines that appear unwarranted based on recent precedent of this Court.??

?

To read the full brief, click here [ [link removed] ].

? ?

###







Stay Connected with Office of Texas Attorney General on
Facebook [ [link removed] ]?-?Twitter [ [link removed] ]?-?Instagram [ [link removed] ]?-?Email [ [link removed] ]

?Update your subscriptions, modify your password or email address, or stop subscriptions at any time on your Subscriber Preferences Page [ [link removed] ]. You will need to use your email address to log in. If you have questions or problems with the subscription service, please visit subscriberhelp.govdelivery.com [ [link removed] ].


________________________________________________________________________

This email was sent to [email protected] using GovDelivery Communications Cloud on behalf of: Office of Texas Attorney General ?300 W. 15th Street?? Austin, TX?78701 GovDelivery logo [ [link removed] ]