Press coverage of Judicial Watch suit on Iwan brothers IT scandal
[NEWSWATCH]
KEY RELEASE
[600x300]
[[link removed]]
Federal Court Hearing on Awan Brothers, Congressional Democrat IT
Scandal
[[link removed]]
Source: Judicial Watch
[[link removed]]
Imran Awan and his family were banned from the House computer
network in February 2017 after the House’s top law enforcement
officer wrote that Imran is “an ongoing and serious risk to the
House of Representatives, possibly threatening the integrity of our
information systems,” and that a server containing evidence had gone
“missing.” The inspector general said server logs showed
“unauthorized access” and procurement records were falsified.
[13x13x1]
[[link removed]]
READ MORE
[[link removed]]
MAJOR MEDIA REPORTS
[180x150x1]
[[link removed]]
2019-12-13
DOJ Refuses To Release Records On Imran Awan, Citing ‘Technical
Difficulties’ And A Secret Case, Court Docs Show
[[link removed]]
Source: Daily Caller
[[link removed]]
Judicial Watch sued the Department of Justice for records about
former Democratic cybersecurity aide Imran Awan in order to square
evidence of wrongdoing with prosecutors’ decision not to charge
malpractices on Capitol Hill.
[13x13x1]
[[link removed]]
READ MORE
[[link removed]]
[180x150x2]
[[link removed]]
2019-12-13
Judicial Watch suing for evidence in case of congressional IT
staffer Imran Awan
[[link removed]]
Source: Yahoo News
[[link removed]]
Luke Rosiak, author of _Obstruction of Justice_:_ How the Deep
State Risked National Security to Protect Democrats_: "All these
things documented left and right, and the FBI says we cannot do
anything because there's an ongoing investigation."
[13x13x1]
[[link removed]]
READ MORE
[[link removed]]
[180x150x3]
[[link removed]]
2019-12-13
Scandal Reopens? Court Papers On Democrat IT Aide Imran Awan Make
New Revelation
[[link removed]]
Source: The Daily Wire
[[link removed]]
The Department of Justice said this month that it could not
release records on Democrat technology aide Imran Awan due to
“technical difficulties,” but later admitted in court documents
that it could not release records on him because there is a secret
ongoing case related to the matter.
[13x13x1]
[[link removed]]
READ MORE
[[link removed]]
[Contribute]
[[link removed]]
[32x32x1]
[[link removed]]
[32x32x2]
[[link removed]]
[32x32x3]
[[link removed]]
[32x32x3]
[[link removed]]
Judicial Watch, Inc.
425 3rd St Sw Ste 800
Washington, DC 20024
202.646.5172
©2017-2019, All Rights Reserved
Manage Email Subscriptions
[[link removed]]
|
Unsubscribe
[[link removed]]
View in browser
[[link removed]]
