One big question policy makers are grappling with these days is to what extent markets can be used to curb climate change and protect the nature that's fundamental to our wellbeing in so many ways.
For some it's a no-brainer: if only we can shift the trillions of dollars washing around the global financial system to invest in a green and socially fair transition, then job done, they argue.
For others, it's far from clear that the profit-hungry capitalist beast can transform itself into the tree-loving, people-centred creature the planet needs.
Right now the two worlds are colliding in the "crypto carbon" market - also known as regenerative finance - whose proponents say putting carbon credits on the blockchain will increase transparency and open up the market to new investors, boosting much-needed flows of climate finance.
But can this be easily believed?
Market veterans are worried that the process of bundling up offsets from various forest conservation or renewable energy projects into "digital tokens" is obscuring the quality of the underlying asset, and is tilted far more in favour of financial speculators than trees and communities.
"I don't like the idea that you take a variety of credits - some good, some crap - you tokenize them into the blockchain without any additional controls, and the buyer has no idea what the hell they are buying," says Pedro Martins Barata, co-chair of an expert panel on improving the integrity of the voluntary carbon markets.
We've spent the past few months investigating the risks and opportunities of the crypto carbon market, focused on one major pioneer, Brazilian "green" crypto firm Moss. We think it's an eye-opening piece of reporting that is well worth your time.
|