View this email in your browser ([link removed])
An update from FactCheck.org


** Trump Distorts Mar-a-Lago Search
------------------------------------------------------------

In a nearly two-hour rally in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania -- to campaign for the state’s Republican candidates for governor and U.S. Senate -- former President Donald Trump turned to the FBI search of his Florida home on Aug. 8. The search was lawfully executed after the warrant was approved by a federal magistrate judge. But Trump falsely claimed there was a "phony pretext" for the search.

To the contrary, Trump repeatedly thwarted efforts by the National Archives and Records Administration to recover highly classified government records that were taken to Mar-a-Lago from the White House.

As FactCheck.org staffers Eugene Kiely, Robert Farley and D’Angelo Gore explain ([link removed]) , NARA worked through 2021 and finally got 15 boxes of records from Trump in January of this year. A preliminary FBI review ([link removed]) found the boxes contained “184 unique documents bearing classification markings, including 67 documents marked as CONFIDENTIAL, 92 documents marked as SECRET, and 25 documents marked as TOP SECRET.”

But the Department of Justice had reason to believe that there were more classified records to be recovered. It issued a subpoena to Trump’s office in May, asking for all documents “bearing classification markings.” In response, DOJ got one envelope containing 38 documents. But that wasn’t everything.

A DOJ court filing said ([link removed]) the FBI found evidence indicating that “classified documents remained at the Premises” and “that efforts were likely taken to obstruct the government’s investigation.”

The Aug. 8 FBI search uncovered ([link removed]) more than 100 documents with classified markings and 48 “empty” folders marked as having once contained “classified” material.

This is why the FBI got the search warrant. It wasn't a "phony pretext."

Trump’s Pennsylvania rally included numerous other factual distortions, as Eugene, Rob and D’Angelo explain. Read the full story, "Trump Distorts Facts in Pennsylvania Rally ([link removed])
. ([link removed]) "
HOW WE KNOW
When a Republican super PAC’s ad criticized Democratic U.S. Senate candidate John Fetterman for voting to recommend the commutation of a life sentence for a man convicted of murder in 1970, we turned to historical newspaper accounts of the case to learn more. The Fetterman campaign cited several news ([link removed]) clippings ([link removed]) obtained from Newspapers.com ([link removed]) , an online archive, and we found some others from the Delaware County Daily Times in 1970 and 1971 chronicling the trial and sentencing hearing. Read more. ([link removed])
FEATURED FACT
When is a person running for president officially considered a candidate? The Federal Election Commission says ([link removed]) that happens once someone has raised or spent more than $5,000 in contributions or expenditures to seek elected office. That doesn't include spending to “test the waters.”
“All such candidates must register with a Statement of Candidacy (Form 2) and designate a principal campaign committee within 15 days of becoming a candidate as described,” according to the FEC. Read more. ([link removed])
WORTHY OF NOTE
A HuffPost story about the U.S. Senate race in Pennsylvania between Democrat John Fetterman and Republican Dr. Mehmet Oz made a brief mention of our work. "Oz has called his opponent 'soft on crime' ([link removed]) during the campaign but, as Factcheck.org noted, ([link removed]) the claim stretches the facts," the Sept. 7 story said ([link removed]) .

The link goes to our late August story describing how some of Oz's claims stretch the facts. For instance, Oz misleadingly claims Fetterman wants to “eliminate life sentences for murderers.” Instead, Fetterman has said he wants to eliminate mandatory life sentences without parole for people convicted of second-degree murder. We know how time-consuming fact-checking can be, and we appreciate it when other news organizations cite our articles.

REPLY ALL

Reader: How come you guys never fact check Joe Biden? Especially his speeches.

FactCheck.org Managing Editor Lori Robertson: Actually, we do fact-check President Joe Biden, including in a story we published last week ([link removed]) , on Sept. 2.

In that article, we wrote about Biden's recent campaign-style speeches in Pennsylvania and at events hosted by the Democratic National Committee. We found that he was wrong about COVID-19 statistics, greatly understating the supply of COVID-19 vaccines when he took office and overstating the number of deaths from the disease. As we said in the story: "We’ve written ([link removed]) repeatedly ([link removed]) about ([link removed]) Biden’s misleading remarks about a low vaccine supply when he became president."

In these speeches, Biden also may have left the wrong impression that police officers were killed during the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, as we explained. And he repeated a misleading talking point about the Affordable Care Act that we've also written about before ([link removed]) . Biden said at the Aug. 25 DNC rally that “if you don’t have the Affordable Care Act, people … with a preexisting [condition] cannot get insurance.” We explained that while the ACA expanded preexisting condition protections, "[p]lenty of Americans with preexisting conditions had insurance before the ACA."

On Aug. 17, we published ([link removed]) an article on Biden's repeated boasts about declining gasoline prices. We wrote that Biden can't claim much credit for that. "Analysts have said the decrease can mostly be attributed to a drop in the price of crude oil, which has declined largely because of concerns that the global economy may soon experience a downturn, reducing demand for oil," we said.

The day before that, we wrote ([link removed]) about competing claims from Democrats, including Biden, and Republicans about inflation.

So, yes, we do fact-check Biden, and we expect to do plenty more of it while he's in office.

We also encourage tips from readers. If you spot a claim from Biden, or any other politician, that you think should be fact-checked, please let us know.


** Wrapping Up
------------------------------------------------------------

Here's what else we've got for you this week:
* "Fetterman’s Commutation Vote on Convicted Murderer ([link removed]) ": A Republican super PAC’s ad labels Democratic U.S. Senate candidate John Fetterman “dangerously liberal on crime,” citing a case in which Fetterman, the lieutenant governor of Pennsylvania, voted to recommend the commutation of a life sentence for a man convicted of murder in 1970. We thought readers may want to know more of the context of the case.
* "Biden’s Campaign-Style Distortions ([link removed]) ": As the midterm elections draw near, President Joe Biden has delivered campaign-style speeches that misstated statistics on the COVID-19 pandemic, may leave the wrong impression that police officers were killed during the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, and overstated the impact of the Affordable Care Act.
* "Biden Hasn’t Officially Filed for Reelection, Contrary to Social Media Claims ([link removed]) ": President Joe Biden hasn’t filed anything yet with the Federal Election Commission that would officially indicate he’s running for reelection. But partisan social media accounts have been falsely claiming that he has. The claims are based on a misinterpretation of a routine filing.

Y lo que publicamos en español ([link removed]) (English versions are accessible in each story):
* "Artículo hace acusaciones infundadas sobre la respuesta de salud pública al brote de la viruela del mono ([link removed]) ": Un artículo publicado en inglés y español repite la desmentida idea de que el brote actual de viruela del mono puede haber resultado de un virus que fue creado en un laboratorio. La nota también afirma infundadamente que la decisión de la Organización Mundial de la Salud de declarar el brote una emergencia de salud pública fue motivada por intereses económicos.

Do you like FactCheck.Weekly? Share it with a friend! They can subscribe here ([link removed]) .
Donate to Support Our Work ([link removed])

============================================================
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Instagram ([link removed])
We'll show up in your inbox every Friday with this fact-focused rundown. But you can message us any day of the week with questions or comments: [email protected].
Copyright © 2022 FactCheck.org, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
FactCheck.org
Annenberg Public Policy Center
202 S. 36th St.
Philadelphia, PA 19104-3806

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed][UNIQID]&c=ff9a7620f9&utm_source=FactCheck.org&utm_campaign=f856fcaeb7-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2022_09_06_09_41&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_3294bba774-f856fcaeb7-48392213)
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed][UNIQID]&c=ff9a7620f9&utm_source=FactCheck.org&utm_campaign=f856fcaeb7-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2022_09_06_09_41&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_3294bba774-f856fcaeb7-48392213)
.

This email was sent to [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
why did I get this? ([link removed]) unsubscribe from this list ([link removed]) update subscription preferences ([link removed])
FactCheck.org: A Project of The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania . 202 S 36th St. . Philadelphia, Pa 19104 . USA