This is the Daily Media Update published by the Institute for Free Speech. For press inquiries, please contact Luke Wachob at [email protected].  
The Courts
 
By Ewan Palmer
.....Florida Governor Ron DeSantis is being sued over his "STOP Woke ACT," over claims the law violates free speech and hinders "professors' ability to teach and students' ability to learn."
A professor and student group from the University of South Florida has filed a suit against DeSantis arguing the legislation the Republican signed in law in April (full name Stop the Wrongs to Our Kids and Employees Act) will "impermissibly chill" free expression and promote "unconstitutional censorship" in higher education...
Announcing the new lawsuit against DeSantis, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression [FIRE], said the First Amendment doesn't allow Florida law to declare which concepts are "too challenging" for students and faculty members to discuss.
By Lia Russell
.....A Hampden-based school district’s agreement to pay a far-right activist $40,000 to resolve a federal First Amendment lawsuit shows that school boards have to clear a high legal bar if they want to ban people they deem disruptive from their meetings.
By Trevor Schakohl
.....A U.S. district court Tuesday ordered the Justice Department (DOJ) to produce communications between National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Anthony Fauci, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre and social media companies.
Republican Attorneys General Eric Schmitt of Missouri and Jeff Landry of Louisiana filed a lawsuit against the administration in May for allegedly colluding with social media companies or coercing them to suppress disfavored content on platforms using “disinformation,” “misinformation” and “malinformation” labels in violation of the First Amendment. District Judge Terry Doughty mandated as part of the case Tuesday that communications between the companies and Fauci and Jean-Pierre be provided based on Schmitt and Landry’s requests.
IRS
 
National Taxpayers Union FoundationIRS Again Fails to Protect Taxpayer Data
By Tyler Martinez
.....In a pre-Labor Day news dump, the IRS admitted to publishing 120,000 taxpayer forms in a public database. Names, contact information and financial information were all available for search and download on the IRS website. The Wall Street Journal reported it was able to find at least some of the information before government staff pulled it down. Bloomberg reports that the IRS knew the information was there since August 26, but there was no indication how long the information was available to the public. 
The data came from Form 990-T, which serves a dual purpose. Charities and other tax-exempt organizations with non-exempt business income must file Form 990-T and that information is public...
This is just another example of the IRS playing fast and loose with taxpayer data. ProPublica generated a lot of debate when it got its hands on taxpayer data, which NTUF criticized — both in getting the data and how the data is used to push a narrative.
The Media

By Sarah Ellison
.....A newcomer to the community of billionaire media moguls, Döpfner is given to bold pronouncements and visionary prescriptions. He’s concerned that the American press has become too polarized — legacy brands like the New York Times and The Washington Post drifting to the left, in his view, while conservative media falls under the sway of Trumpian “alternative facts.” So in Politico, the fast-growing Beltway political journal, he sees a grand opportunity.
“We want to prove that being nonpartisan is actually the more successful positioning,” he said in an interview with The Washington Post. He called it his “biggest and most contrarian bet.”
Candidates and Campaigns
 
By Katrina vanden Heuvel
.....When the Democratic National Committee gathers in Washington this week, Judith Whitmer, chair of the state party in Nevada, and more than 30 DNC members will support DNC Resolution 19, calling on the party to ban dark money in Democratic primaries...
The real worry about partial campaign finance reforms — that no candidate or party can “unilaterally disarm” — doesn’t apply here. The DNC would be reforming contests among competing Democrats — and any dark-money ban would surely help curb the interference of Republican interests in those elections...
Passage of Whitmer’s resolution shouldn’t be controversial. Democrats in both the House and the Senate voted overwhelmingly for H.R. 1, the sweeping voting-rights bill introduced in 2021, which included strong campaign finance elements. President Biden campaigned for its passage. That bill was ultimately defeated but, now, the Democratic National Committee can take action to clean its own house. It should not fail this test.
The States
 
By The Associated Press
.....A New Mexico state district court judge on Tuesday disqualified county commissioner and Cowboys for Trump cofounder Couy Griffin from holding public office for engaging in insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
The judgment from state District Court Judge Francis Mathew permanently bars Griffin from federal and local public office. It arrived amid a spate of lawsuits aimed at sidelining political candidates and elected officials linked to the Capitol riots.
Griffin was previously convicted in federal court of a misdemeanor for entering Capitol grounds on Jan. 6, without going inside the building. He was sentenced to 14 days and given credit for time served.
The new ruling immediately removes Griffin from his position as a commissioner in Otero County in southern New Mexico. He also is barred from serving as a presidential elector...
“The actions that are being taken are, I believe, perfect evidence of the tyranny that we’re right now living under,” Griffin said. “The left continues to speak about democracy being under attack, but is this democracy? Whenever you’re removed from office by the civil courts by the opinion of a liberal judge.”
By Shayna Jacobs, Jacqueline Alemany and Josh Dawsey 
.....Stephen K. Bannon is expected to surrender to state prosecutors on Thursday to face a new criminal indictment, people familiar with the matter said, weeks after he was convicted of contempt of Congress and nearly two years after he received a federal pardon from President Donald Trump in a federal fraud case.
The precise details of the state case could not be confirmed Tuesday evening. But people familiar with the situation, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sealed indictment, suggested the prosecution will likely mirror aspects of the federal case in which Bannon was pardoned.
In that indictment, prosecutors alleged that Bannon and several others defrauded contributors to a private, $25 million fundraising effort, called “We Build the Wall,” taking funds that donors were told would support construction of a barrier along the U.S.-Mexico border.
By Maxford Nelsen
.....Aaron Tang is a University of California, Davis, law professor who specializes in brainstorming ways to “outmaneuver the court and avoid the consequences of a ruling.” He has called on states to use government funds to replace union revenue lost to Janus directly. Troublingly, this might even pass constitutional muster. While Janus recognized that “compelled subsidization of private speech seriously impinges on First Amendment rights,” the Supreme Court concluded in Johanns v. Livestock Marketing Association (2005) that Americans “have no First Amendment right not to fund government speech.”
First Amendment scholar Eugene Volokh considers direct taxpayer funding of unions constitutionally permissible as government speech. ”Nothing forbids the government from funding controversial causes like Planned Parenthood . . . the National Rifle Association or the American Civil Liberties Union,” he has written. Presumably this means that government can constitutionally fund political parties themselves. But the high court cautioned in Matal v. Tam (2017) that the government-speech doctrine is “susceptible to dangerous misuse,” especially if “private speech could be passed off as government speech.”
By Amy Loprest
.....When I took the helm of NYC’s Campaign Finance Board in 2006, people weren’t talking about copying our matching funds program. That all changed after Citizens United. Local governments from Washington, D.C. to Denver to Seattle have erected financing programs that put more power in the hands of everyday people. We’ve even seen action at the state level, notably here in New York where a statewide matching funds program will start next year...
At the federal level, the We the People Act includes small-dollar matching public financing for congressional races. This would help fix the out-of-control escalation in fundraising that rewards extreme voices and excludes voters.
Read an article you think we would be interested in? Send it to Tiffany Donnelly at [email protected]. For email filters, the subject of this email will always begin with "Institute for Free Speech Media Update."  
The Institute for Free Speech is a nonpartisan, nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization that promotes and defends the First Amendment rights to freely speak, assemble, publish, and petition the government. Please support the Institute's mission by clicking here. For further information, visit www.ifs.org 
Follow the Institute for Free Speech