The Rules of Engagement
Way back in 2019 — precedented times, one might say — we launched a 12-month-long specialized election tracker ahead of the 2020 general election to follow federal candidates' treatment of the press. The idea was that knowing how candidates treated the press on the campaign trail might give some indication as to how they would treat the media if elected to office.
Flash forward to 2022. In his campaign ad for Florida’s 7th District congressional seat, Republican Cory Mills shows video of journalists being shot at with crowd-control munitions and boasts how his company was the manufacturer (“If the media wants to shed some real tears, I can help them out with that.”). Mills just won his primary. The Republican National Committee has already pulled out of any future presidential debates, with Republicans shunning debates in general this primary season. And a conservative group is organizing events for Republican candidates with access requirements that are openly hostile to the ethics of newsgathering.
That group, Turning Point Action, is requiring journalists to give over footage and editorial control in exchange for access. Events which include Pennsylvania’s Republican gubernatorial candidate Don Mastriano together with Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis; Ohio Republican Senate candidate J.D. Vance with Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis; and Arizona Republican Senate candidate Blake Masters Senate and Republican gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake with, yes, Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis. Mastriano, Vance, Masters and Lake each won their respective primaries.
In his Letter from the Editor, Cleveand.com and the Plain Dealer Editor Chris Quinn called the rules of access “absurd” and lambasted candidates hiding behind Turning Point’s restrictions: “They want to take an oath to uphold the US Constitution while trampling all over one of its most important principles, the freedom of the press.”
Read: Jon Allsop’s great in-depth coverage, first published in Columbia Journalism Review, “There’s no right way to respond to GOP media restrictions. That’s the point.”
Restricting press from non-government events, however, isn’t technically a First Amendment violation and so the Tracker doesn’t systematically document them. But we are watching — and wondering: Where do we go from here?
As I told The Washington Post when it wrote about the group’s “unusual restrictions,” it really is the public that loses.
|