From CUFI Action Fund <[email protected]>
Subject Action Update: Can we Avoid a Nuclear Iran?
Date August 30, 2022 12:30 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
There's an old Jewish lesson (of sorts) that goes something like this:
if you haven't had a drop to drink, yet two Rabbis tell you you're
drunk, go home and sleep it off. The message is simple: no matter how
confident you are in your belief or position, if two learned friends
tell you you're wrong, take some time to reconsider. President Biden
would do well to bear this lesson in mind in the days and weeks ahead.

The Two Rabbis

Whether or not they all have the courage to say so publicly, there is
widespread bipartisan Congressional concern with the details emerging
about the impending nuclear deal between world powers and Iran.

While many Democrats are keeping their powder dry, some have sounded the
alarm that this deal falls short of what was promised to them by the
administration.  Senator Bob Menendez of New Jersey, the Democratic
chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said earlier in the
summer that President Biden needs "a comprehensive strategy to address
Iran and the threats it poses - Iran as it is, not the Iran we might
hope for." More recently, Rep. Kathy Manning (D-NC), a member of the
House Foreign Affairs Committee correctly stated, "This proposal, as
it stands, fails to address key challenges. Under this proposal, Iran
would benefit from immediate sanctions relief in return for getting back
into a flawed deal that expires soon. The U.S. must demand a stronger
agreement to prevent the threat of a nuclear-armed Iran."

Likewise, several Senators who spoke at the recent CUFI Washington
Summit were similarly appalled by the Biden administration's weakness
in the face of Iranian demands. Put simply, top leaders of the
legislative branch of the United States Government - a co-equal branch
to the executive - are saying they are concerned.

The second Rabbi is coming to Washington at the end of this week. David
Barnea, the chief of Israel's famed intelligence agency, the Mossad,
will brief lawmakers on the House and Senate Intelligence Committees and
administration officials, including our own CIA, about Israel's view
of the impending deal.

Barnea will provide these leaders with far more information than we'll
ever know about Iran's current nuclear weapons program and support for
terror around the world. What's clear from his public statements is
that Israel is deeply concerned about the current terms of the deal and
will likely be imploring the U.S. to take a harder line - while
clearly reserving their own right to act unilaterally.

Two Rabbis, the U.S. Congress and Israel's Mossad, are telling the
President to rethink his approach, we humbly recommend Mr. Biden go home
and sleep it off.

Avoiding War

But what if he doesn't? What if the President proceeds down the
present path? We are loathe to ever predict conflict, but one does not
need a crystal ball to see where this is going. The current deal's
shortcomings all but ensure Iran will have a nuclear weapons capability
in a few short years (at best). Such would be untenable for Israel (as
it should be for the U.S., but we digress).

Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid recently noted, "We can reach such
an agreement if a credible military threat is put on the table, if the
Iranians realize that their defiance and deceit will have a heavy
price." The Prime Minister went on to note that he has instructed
Israel's military and intelligence services "to prepare for any
scenario."

On the other side of the divide, mass-murderer and Iranian President
Ebrahim Raisi said on Monday that if Israel attacks Iran's nuclear
program, "[we] will see if anything from the Zionist regime will
remain or not."

The overarching goal of diplomatic resolutions between nations is to
avoid conflict, but sadly, President Biden's approach is likely
hastening it. Either way, if the President persists in his current
course, Congress is the only possible counterbalance.

The first thing policymakers should do is listen to Barnea's concerns
without any partisan prejudices and as Sen. Menendez pointed out, see
"Iran as it is, not the Iran we might hope for." Failing that, the
other thing Congress should do is heed Prime Minister Lapid's warning
and ensure Israel has an independent, credible military option against
Iran should this deal move forward and the Iranians either invariably
cheat or simply wait the few short years until they will be able to
complete their nuclear program once all restrictions are lifted.

When the Biden Administration gave up on their goal of a longer and
stronger deal, the answer was not to cave but to return to a pressure
track until Iran would come to the table on their terms. Instead, we are
heading towards a weaker, more narrow, and shorter deal whose end result
will be a Middle East living under the cloud of the world's leading
sponsor of terror possessing the world's deadliest weapon.

Sincerely,

The CUFI Action Fund Team

SUPPORT CUFI ACTION FUND
_________________

Sent to [email protected]

Unsubscribe:
[link removed]

CUFI Action Fund, 233 Pennsylvania Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20003, United States
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis