BEST FOR BRITAIN'S WEEKEND WIRE
Dear John
Welcome to the long weekend! Because you’ve got longer to
read it before the week starts all over again, I’ve crammed in a
little bit more to keep you busy.
We’re just over a week away from
the announcement of a new Prime Minister, while the current government
seems to have just been on holiday all month. Energy bills are
skyrocketing, inflation and the cost of living are rising through the
roof and the whole of Europe is drought-stricken and feeling the
direct effects of climate change.
So sit down and get ready for
the weekend with our handy update. We don’t promise to provide cheer,
but we do promise to keep you informed and to give you ways to take
action to make all our futures a bit brighter.
Energy price
cap
We’ll start with the most
depressing news of the week. It’s the energy price cap, which Ofgem
has confirmed will rise to £3,549 from October.
This figure represents a near
tripling of the cap from last October, when it hit £1,277. It should
be pretty obvious to everyone (and hopefully also to our new PM) that
this is unsustainable for the vast majority of people.
How to deal with the cap is the
subject of continuing debate. Liz Truss’s anti-‘handout’ position
seems to have softened in recent weeks, although she still seems set on tax cuts which are likely to disproportionately
benefit the wealthiest members of society and offer nothing to the
poorest.
Labour has called for an
emergency budget and is asking for the cap to be frozen.
Whatever happens though, it
needs to happen soon - as things are going to get dramatically worse
very quickly unless people get help soon.
A bit
sh*t
We’ve been hearing for some time
now about how deliberate sewage spills by water companies have polluted our rivers
and our seas - and water company bosses have pocketed a tidy payout despite their failures to keep our
waterways clean.
The Lib Dems found that many of
the monitors designed to measure and record sewage overflows are faulty. Across Devon and Cornwall, they found this
affected one in eight sewage monitors, and that across all water
company-installed monitors, information was only provided for 90% of
the time.
French politicians have
pointed out that even though the UK isn’t in the EU
anymore, it is still a signatory to several international treaties
which oblige us to avoid polluting shared waters. They’re worried our
sewage is going to land on French beaches and contaminate fish and
seafood stocks and shellfish farms.
Any story about sewage is
likely to stink but this really is a bit sh*t.
Pipe
dream
To make matters worse, it turns out
English water companies are currently replacing just 0.05% of their pipe
network each year - meaning
it would take 2,000 years before our entire network of leaky and
overstretched pipes was replaced. Perhaps water company bosses are
inspired by the 2,000 year old Roman baths at Bath, whose lead pipes are still going strong
after all this time.
This compares to a replacement
rate of 0.5% a year for most European countries - a rate that predicts
most piping will last 200 years - something that seems far more
realistic.
It seems like our water
companies are crossing their fingers and hoping for the best - but the
turbulent times are already here.
Inflation
nation
Dire warnings come from Citi Bank this week with projections that inflation is likely
to reach 18% by the start of 2023.
Citi has predicted the energy
price cap will rise to £4,567 in January, and then reach £5,816 in
June - and thus will be a huge driver of dramatic inflation
rates.
No ethics
needed
Liz Truss has announced her
extraordinary decision that, if she becomes PM, she will not appoint
an ethics adviser because she knows ‘the difference between right and
wrong’. Clearly Boris
Johnson’s ethics adviser must have resigned from his role because the PM was beyond
reproach.
Truss claims that ‘outsourcing’
ethics is not the right way to go, and that ethical standards must
instead run through the heart of Government. This is all well and
good, but who gets to decide what those standards are, and judge
whether they are being followed, in the absence of an adviser? And if
the PM is the arbiter of ethics in government, what happens when we’re
(again) faced with a PM whose ethics are a little…dodgy?
Yep, the NHS is on the
table
Liz Truss’s disregard for the NHS
has been on display recently. News that she had written an opinion piece in 2009 supporting cuts to NHS funding and
to doctors’ pay set tongues wagging. But of course, that opinion piece
was over 10 years old, so it was easy to claim that these were Truss’s
old views.
This week, however, it became
clear that Truss is more than happy to tear into the NHS. She says she
will divert money allocated for tackling Covid backlogs away
from the NHS and channel it into social care.
More money for social care is
no bad thing - but this shouldn’t mean less money for the NHS. Without
a fully functioning NHS, our social care system will collapse - but
instead of expanding funding Truss seems set on spreading out the
little there is as thinly as possible.
Enough of the experts,
v2.0
Rishi Sunak isn’t exactly hitting
all the right notes either.
On Wednesday night, in an
interview with The
Spectator, he claimed the
Government had been wrong during the Covid-19 pandemic to ‘empower the scientists’ in the way that it did. This is a bit
bizarre seeing as it was only the scientists who had the expertise to
understand and make predictions about the pandemic.
According to Sunak, the
scientists were given too much of a say in the nature and length of
lockdowns.
The scientific community has
reacted with displeasure - many pointing out scientists had little
or no decision-making power, and were simply supplying facts which
informed decisions made by the politicians.
If Sunak wants to hear less
from those with the facts, maybe he should hit up his colleague
Michael Gove, who famously said British people had had ‘enough of experts’ and their opinions when asked about
expertise in support of his pro-Brexit position.
BBC
bias
Former Newsnight presenter Emily
Maitlis delivered explosive accusations about the
BBC.
She criticised the role of
Robbie Gibb on the BBC’s board. Gibb helped to found GB News and was
formerly Theresa May’s Director of Communications as PM. Maitlis
alleged that he is shaping the BBC’s output into a distinctly less
neutral form by acting as the ‘arbiter of impartiality’.
She also claimed the BBC was
unusually keen to pacify Downing Street after she criticised Dominic Cummings’s lockdown breaches. She said that the BBC was very
quick to accuse itself of failing to be impartial.
Steel
yourselves
In more depressing Brexit news, it emerged UK steel producers will have to
pay a 25% tariff to sell certain construction products to Northern
Ireland on account of EU tariffs for global steel imports being
exhausted for the year.
EU producers can continue to
export tariff-free throughout the UK - while the UK pays a price for
trading throughout its own internal market. It’s all the more
embarrassing because the UK literally voted for this to happen - the
Northern Ireland Protocol is a key part of Boris Johnson’s ‘oven-ready
deal’ with the EU. Well done us.
No negotiation
needed
While it’s clear to all that the
Northern Ireland Protocol could do with some adjustments, Liz Truss is
reportedly planning to continue the current Prime Minister’s approach to the
question.
That is, she intends to keep
shouting that the EU is refusing to negotiate at the same time as the
UK Government is pressing on with the Northern Ireland Protocol Bill
which would give the UK legal cover to break the treaty we signed with
the EU.
And now Truss appears to be
saying she would trigger Article 16 of the Protocol if she wins the
leadership election. Some of her supporters mistakenly seem to think this would unilaterally cancel the
Protocol, rather than in actuality starting a dispute-resolution
process that would create massive uncertainty for Northern Ireland and
businesses trading across the borders.
Ending with the important
stuff
In June we alerted you to the
defining policy decision of the era: the choice of whether to return
to imperial measurements from the metric ones we’ve all got used
to.
We’re now letting you know that
it’s your last chance to respond to Jacob Rees-Mogg’s
consultation on this, as it
closes at 11pm tonight.
The potential transition back
to imperial measurements has been hailed as a Brexit benefit and
really, when the pickings are so slim, it’s understandable that the
Government would want to big it up.
It’s such a fantastic
opportunity to be involved in the democratic decisions that really
matter and tell Rees-Mogg what you really think.
On that note - have a lovely
long weekend!
Best wishes,
Maheen Behrana
Senior Campaigns and Policy Officer, Best for Britain
PS. Please do support the campaign with either a
one-off
donation to the Better Democracy Fund, or by
becoming
a regular supporter. Your support will mean we can
bring progressive parties together, fight undemocratic changes to our
elections, and campaign for a change in our voting system to make all
votes count.
|