From The Rutherford Institute <[email protected]>
Subject Rein in the Government's Power to Disregard the Rule of Law
Date August 25, 2022 9:47 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Make the government play by the rules of the Constitution.

View this email in your browser ([link removed])
[link removed]



** For Immediate Release: August 25, 2022
------------------------------------------------------------


** Rutherford Institute Challenges Government Efforts to Undermine Sixth Amendment Rights in Criminal Cases
------------------------------------------------------------

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Rutherford Institute has called on the U.S. Supreme Court to rein in the government’s power to indiscriminately pick and choose the laws by which it will abide ([link removed]) , especially as it relates to the rights of the accused in criminal cases.

Weighing in before the Supreme Court in two cases, Khorrami v. Arizona ([link removed]) and Smith v. United States ([link removed]) , Rutherford Institute attorneys are challenging government efforts to undermine longstanding Sixth Amendment rights: namely, the right to have a trial by an impartial jury of twelve fellow citizens and to be tried in the district where the alleged crime was committed.

“We now live in a society in which a person can be accused of any number of crimes without knowing what exactly he has done. He might be apprehended in the middle of the night by a roving band of SWAT police. He might find himself on a no-fly list, unable to travel for reasons undisclosed. He might have his phones or internet tapped based upon a secret order handed down by a secret court, with no recourse to discover why he was targeted,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People ([link removed]) . “The Sixth Amendment serves as an antidote to the abuses of the American police state: ensuring that when people are accused of a crime, they know what they’re being charged with and are given the opportunity to have a fair, speedy and public trial, an impartial jury, the right to a lawyer, and the chance to confront and
question their accusers.”
MAKE THE GOVERNMENT PLAY BY THE RULES OF THE CONSTITUTION: SUPPORT THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM ([link removed])

The two cases before the U.S. Supreme Court raise concerns about the government diminishing a person’s rights under the Sixth Amendment. In Khorrami v. Arizona, Ramin Khorrami was convicted for fraudulent schemes and theft by a jury of eight members. An Arizona law allows for criminal defendants to be tried by an eight-person jury, only requiring a twelve-person jury for charges which carry a punishment of death or imprisonment of 30 years or more. In their amicus brief in Khorrami ([link removed]) , Rutherford Institute attorneys urged the Supreme Court to prevent the government from arbitrarily reducing the number of individuals on a jury, pointing out that a “jury” has long been understood to require twelve members since the Constitution and Bill of Rights were ratified.

In Smith v. United States, Timothy Smith was convicted of theft of trade secrets for acts he committed while in Alabama involving computer servers located in the Middle District of Florida. However, Smith was charged and tried in the Northern District of Florida. Smith appealed, noting that he had been tried in the wrong district. The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals vacated Smith’s conviction. However, the appellate court held that Smith could be retried for the same offense in the proper district without implicating the Double Jeopardy clause. Rutherford attorneys warned ([link removed]) that if there is no sufficient consequence to deter the government from selecting an unfair trial location or district, the government could circumvent protections against Double Jeopardy and perpetually retry an accused in one district after another.

Michael Li-Ming Wong, Robert K. Hur, Vladimir J. Semendyai, and Philip Hammersley of Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher LLP advanced the arguments in the Smith v. United States amicus brief ([link removed]) . Stuart Banner of the UCLA School of Law Supreme Court Clinic advanced the arguments in the amicus brief for Khorrami v. Arizona ([link removed]) .

The Rutherford Institute ([link removed]) , a nonprofit civil liberties organization, provides legal assistance at no charge to individuals whose constitutional rights have been threatened or violated and educates the public on a wide spectrum of issues affecting their freedoms.

The amicus briefs in Khorrami v. Arizona ([link removed]) and Smith v. United States ([link removed]) are available at www.rutherford.org.

Source: [link removed]
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Frein-in-the-governments-power-to-disregard-the-rule-of-law Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Frein-in-the-governments-power-to-disregard-the-rule-of-law)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
CLICK HERE TO MAKE A TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION ([link removed])

To donate via PayPal, please click below:
[link removed]

============================================================
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
CONTACT INFORMATION
Nisha Whitehead
(434) 978-3888 ext. 604
** [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])

THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE
Post Office Box 7482
Charlottesville, VA 22906-7482
Phone: (434) 978-3888
** www.rutherford.org ([link removed])

Copyright © 2022 The Rutherford Institute, All rights reserved.

You are receiving this email because of your interest in the work of The Rutherford Institute. Founded in 1982 by constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead, The Rutherford Institute is a civil liberties organization that provides free legal services to people whose constitutional and human rights have been threatened or violated. To discontinue your membership electronically, or if you feel you are receiving this message in error, please follow the link below.

Under the regulations of the United States Internal Revenue Service, The Rutherford Institute is incorporated as a 501(c)(3) tax exempt nonprofit organization. Donations to support The Rutherford Institute’s legal and educational work help to safeguard the constitutional rights of all Americans. Donations are tax-deductible. In compliance with general industry standards of a nonprofit organization, the Institute is audited annually by an independent accounting firm.

** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])

** update subscription preferences ([link removed])
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis