From Downsize DC <[email protected]>
Subject Did the FDA protect you from hearing aids?
Date August 25, 2022 2:35 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Or did Warren and Biden protect you from the FDA?

View this email in your browser ([link removed])


** Will the FDA do the right thing on hearing aids? Where did this big new free market reform come from?
------------------------------------------------------------

The FDA is supposed to protect you in two ways – by keeping unsafe drugs and treatments off the market, and by making sure those drugs and treatments actually work. So the following headline probably came as a surprise to many people…

FDA moves to make over-the-counter hearing aids available to millions ([link removed])

That can only mean that for many decades hearing aids either didn't work, caused harm, or perhaps both.

Wait, that can't be right because you could get hearing aids. You just needed a doctor's prescription.

That must mean the hearing aids would have been harmful or ineffective without those prescriptions, right?

Why else would the FDA be involved?

Did doctors do something to make hearing aids safer or more effective? Surely it could damage the eardrums if doctors didn't establish and prescribe a safe and effective volume for each patient.

Hold on.

I'm certain I've seen people adjust their hearing aid's volume depending on current conditions. Hell, I've seen my own mother do this!

It simply can't be the case that hearing aids are unsafe or ineffective without precise instructions from doctors. This clearly implies that the FDA has some third function beyond establishing safety and effectiveness. That third function seems to be...


** Cartel creation
------------------------------------------------------------

An FDA-mandated prescription requirement allows politically-influential doctors and medical device manufacturers to earn more money at the expense of patients. These interests get a "concentrated benefit" from these regulations in the form of repeat profits. That's why they have a huge incentive to lobby for this position.

On the other hand, the patients have little incentive to organize resistance. Even if the patients could organize and win - a BIG IF - the price savings would be so dispersed that it's hardly worth the trouble. So...


** Is this proof that we can never defeat the special interests?
------------------------------------------------------------

Well, no. You then have to explain why Congress instructed the FDA to make over-the-counter hearing aids available four years ago. The doctors' and medical device lobbies surely opposed this. Congress did it anyway.

Sometimes Congress does the right thing!


** Did Trump and the Republicans make the FDA finally take action?
------------------------------------------------------------

That idea sounds reasonable right, because everyone knows the Democrats are really communists who want to destroy every last vestige of the free market.

The Republicans had very little to do with this. It was primarily Senator Elizabeth Warren who pushed for this market-oriented change, and Democratic President Joe Biden who signed the Executive Order to finally make it happen.

This demonstrates yet another strategic point we keep stressing to you...


** You don't have to elect better politicians to achieve better outcomes!
------------------------------------------------------------

You can get any kind of politician to support almost any kind of change if they become persuaded of one or both of the following things...
1. Your idea is a good one
2. His/her constituents want it

So that's what we're trying to do, but...


** We need more help from more people!
------------------------------------------------------------

The example I've described above sounds like another justification for passing our Write the Laws Act (WTLA) ([link removed]) , and it is, but we've done a lot of work on WTLA lately, and we want to remind you of our criminal justice reform proposals.

As yet another example of elected politicians doing something right, there is a bill pending in Congress that would prohibit Judicial Findings - judges sentencing people for things that were not demonstrated in court. This violates the presumption of innocence and the right to a fair trial.

Please join The 300 ([link removed]) for this bill if you have not done so already!
End Judicial Findings ([link removed])

And tell your friends about our strategy. Recruit them! And help us to do more outreach by contributing or starting a monthly pledge ([link removed]) .

Set your own agenda,

Perry Willis
Agenda Setters by Downsize DC

============================================================

** Today's Action: Join 'The 300' to End Judicial Findings ([link removed])
Every issue of this newsletter appears on the blog too - sometimes with a modified title. That blog post also gets shared on the Downsize DC Facebook page. Facebook will expose that post to more people if you leave a reaction (Like), a comment, or (especially if you) Share it.
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2022 DownsizeDC.org, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in at our website

Our mailing address is:
DownsizeDC.org
872 Mark Drive
Akron, OH 44313
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis

  • Sender: Downsize DC
  • Political Party: n/a
  • Country: United States
  • State/Locality: n/a
  • Office: n/a
  • Email Providers:
    • MailChimp