Aug. 24, 2022
Permission to republish original opeds and cartoons granted.
New York 19th Congressional District special election win to Democrat Pat Ryan came after trailing polls
By Robert Romano
In New York’s 19th Congressional District special election on Aug. 23, Democrat Pat Ryan narrowly defeated Marc Molinaro, 51.1 percent to 48.9 percent.
That’s a seat House Republicans are hoping to pick up certainly in the November Congressional midterms, and yet their hopes were dashed after Molinaro was leading both Republican and Democratic polls of so-called “likely” voters prior to the special election.
On Aug. 17-22, Data for Progress — a Democratic poll — had the race at 53 percent for Molinaro and 45 percent for Ryan.
On Aug. 6-8, DCCC Targeting and Analytics Department — a Democratic poll — had the race at 46 percent for Molinaro to 43 percent for Pat Ryan, with 11 percent undecided.
On July 26-28, Triton Polling & Research — a Republican poll — had the race at 50 percent for Molinaro and 40 percent for Ryan, with almost 11 percent undecided.
On June 29-30, Public Policy Polling—a Democratic poll—had the race at 43 percent for Molinaro to 40 percent for Ryan with 16 percent undecided.
On June 16-20, Triton had the race at 52 percent for Molinaro to 38 percent for Ryan, with 10 percent undecided.
Every single poll was wrong, on both sides. Republicans overstated their advantage, and Democrats understated theirs. In other news, Republican Joe Sempolinski seemed to easily win the U.S. House special election for New York’s 23rd District, but it might have been closer than expected.
Given Ryan’s close win, the lesson appears to be that perhaps the “likely” Republican voters are perhaps still likely voters, but that “likely” Democratic voters somewhat understated Democratic turnout by several points. That’s important to consider as November rapidly approaches. Why?
A look at national, generic Congressional ballot polls currently shows Democrats leading in polls taken of simply registered voters, while Republicans are favored in polls of “likely” voters.
For example in late July and throughout August, CBS News Battleground Tracker, InsiderAdvantage, Trafalgar Group and Rasmussen Reports all had polls of “likely” voters with Republicans appearing to be somewhat or safely ahead in the generic Congressional ballot.
Whereas, Politico/Morning Consult, Economist/YouGov and Monmouth polls of registered voters in recent weeks have been showing Democrats leading, particularly since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. An exception is NBC News’ most recent poll taken Aug. 12-16, showing Republicans leading 47 percent to 45 percent.
Normally, in a midterm election cycle, the opposition party has the advantage. In midterm elections dating back to 1906 through 2018, the party that occupied the White House lost seats in the House 90 percent of the time, with losses averaging 31 seats. The exceptions were 1934, 1998 and 2002, when the incumbent party was able to pick up seats in the House.
In the Senate, the incumbent party lost seats 70 percent of the time, with losses averaging three seats in the Senate.
A great deal of that has to do with the incumbent party’s voters relaxing after winning a presidential election, whereas the opposition party cannot wait to vote so that they do not remain out of power. It’s fatigue versus anxiety. Usually, the incumbent party becomes a victim of its own success.
So, what’s happening? Perhaps, similar to the 2020 presidential election, more than one predictive model could be colliding into another. In 2020, former President Donald Trump had a lot of momentum on the campaign trail and managed to increase his 2016 vote count by about 13 million. Normally, that should have been enough to win, but there was also Covid and a massive recession that temporarily threw 25 million people out of work, plus pandemic restrictions led to more mail-in ballots being used, both of which appeared to favor Democratic turnout. The outcome was Biden winning narrowly amid record turnout for both parties.
And that’s really the trick to beating either presidential incumbency advantage but also the opposition party’s advantage in midterm election cycles. It’s rare but it happens and 2022 like any other year could always add to that exception. Whichever party is at a disadvantage in those cycles must always find a way to overcome those currents to either minimize losses or to maximize advantage. That’s why we play the game.
In this case, given that polling in New York 19th Congressional District was so wrong, that anyone modeling “likely” turnout in the Congressional midterms should still account for boosted Republican enthusiasm, but now may also need to account for some underpolled segment of Democrats.
Or in November, House Republicans might find themselves in the rare company of 9/11 era Democrats, Clinton impeachment era Republicans and Great Depression Republicans, parties that should have perhaps picked up seats, but were unable to do so owing to exceptional historical circumstances — and be very surprised by the outcome.
Now, it was a special election, too, and so that must be accounted for. Plus, it’s a brand new Congressional district. But the pollsters almost certainly took those into consideration.
Point is, likely voters may not be who you think they are this year.
Robert Romano is the Vice President of Public Policy at Americans for Limited Government.
To view online: https://dailytorch.com/2022/08/new-york-19th-congressional-district-special-election-win-to-democrat-pat-ryan-came-after-trailing-polls/
Afghanistan: Saving those who were left behind w/ Simone Ledeen
To view online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pydH3LRFso
George Neumayr: Yes, Biden Admin Knew About FBI Probe Into Trump and Pushed It
By George Neumayr
To the casual and credulous observer, the FBI raid on Donald Trump’s house unfolded without any involvement from the Biden White House. That’s the impression Biden’s aides sought to leave after issuing narrow denials of any “prior” knowledge of the raid. But that impression is false, as reporter John Solomon reveals in an article in Just the News. The Biden White House not only knew about the FBI’s probe into Trump but “facilitated it,” writes Solomon.
He has seen government memos that show the “Biden White House worked directly with the Justice Department and National Archive to instigate the criminal probe into alleged mishandling of documents, allowing the FBI to review evidence retrieved from Mar-a-Lago this spring and eliminating the 45th president’s claims to executive privilege.”
So once again Biden has unleashed the FBI on a political opponent. The FBI raid on Trump’s house is a replay of its shockingly specious investigation into Trump–Russia collusion that the Obama–Biden administration approved. One might have thought, given that debacle, the Biden White House would have wanted to steer clear of yet another partisan FBI fishing expedition. But Biden obviously couldn’t resist making life difficult for his chief political nemesis.
The memos “show then-White House Deputy Counsel Jonathan Su was engaged in conversations with the FBI, DOJ and National Archives as early as April, shortly after 15 boxes of classified and other materials were voluntarily returned to the federal historical agency from Trump’s Florida home,” according to Solomon. “By May, Su conveyed to the Archives that President Joe Biden would not object to waiving his predecessor’s claims to executive privilege, a decision that opened the door for DOJ to get a grand jury to issue a subpoena compelling Trump to turn over any remaining materials he possessed from his presidency.”
All of this, of course, sets a horrible precedent, as legal scholar Alan Dershowitz notes. Solomon showed him the memos establishing Biden’s critical role in driving the FBI probe. “I was very surprised,” Dershowitz told Solomon. “The current president should not be able to waive the executive privilege of a predecessor, without the consent of the former president. Otherwise, [privilege] means nothing. What president will ever discuss anything in private if he knows the man who beat him can and will disclose it.”
As usual, the double standard of the ruling class that sanitizes Democratic dirty tricks holds sway in Washington. As in the case of the Russian collusion hoax, they used the FBI to infiltrate the Trump campaign based on nothing more than partisan hunches and a collection of smears cobbled together by the campaign of his opponent. Now they use the FBI to raid his house, all while playing innocent about their role in encouraging it. They want the American people to see the FBI as an agency above the fray of politics. But it is clearly not. The seventh floor of the FBI, where its politicized senior leaders roost, looks more and more like an annex of the Democratic Party.
To view online: https://spectator.org/biden-fbi-probe-trump/