After Congress just spent hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars on green energy and 87,000 more IRS agents, some folks may want to grab a smoke to
Summer Reading – FDA Regulations
After Congress just spent hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars on green energy and 87,000 more IRS agents, some folks may want to grab a smoke to try and relax. Please don’t do that, we know it’s been a stressful summer for taxpayers, but don’t pick up a cigarette. If you are a current smoker, you may want to pick up an alternate way to get your nicotine like an e-cigarette or the heat-not-burn technology that are better options than smoking traditional cigarettes. Reforming the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) could help millions of smokers make the switch to less harmful tobacco products and make quitting not such a drag. In 2009, the FDA was given authority to regulate tobacco products when Congress passed the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (TCA). In the years since the passage of TCA and the introduction of reduced tobacco harm products, youth and adult use of combustible cigarettes has significantly declined. In 2021, one percent of middle schoolers and
only 1.9 percent of high school students reported current cigarette use. In 2020, only 12.5 percent of U.S. adults smoked cigarettes.
Despite these declines, public health has demonized novel tobacco harm reduction products such as e-cigarettes. Critics of these life-saving products have also created a so-called youth vaping epidemic. As such, policymakers including lawmakers and federal regulators, have pushed forward with prohibitionist policies which severely thwart adult access to less harmful alternatives to smoking.
Contrary to alarmist headlines, youth vaping is on the decline. In 2021, only 11.3 percent of highschoolers and 2.8 percent of middle schoolers were current e-cigarette users. Between 2019 and 2021, vaping among high school students declined by 58.9 percent and by 73.3 percent among middle schoolers. But FDA continues to delay and deny marketing authorization for millions of e-cigarette products used by millions of adults.
E-cigarettes were first introduced to the U.S. market in 2007 – or two years prior to the FDA having authority over cigarettes. FDA was all too eager to regulate the newfangled tobacco technology. As soon as these products were introduced across the country, the agency tried to exert its authority over them, asserting they were medical devices. As such, manufacturers responded with a lawsuit contending the FDA did not have authority.
In 2010, a year after FDA was given authority to regulate tobacco products, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Court ruled that products containing and/or being derived from tobacco with no therapeutic benefit can be regulated by the FDA as a tobacco product.
In 2016, the FDA finalized rules establishing a regulatory framework for e-cigarettes and other tobacco products that were introduced to the market after 2007 and not covered in the original 2009 TCA. Known as the deeming regulations, the new rules directed manufactures of newly deemed products – including e-cigarettes – to comply with a host of requirements including annual registrations, ingredient listings, and the eventual premarket tobacco product application (PMTA). Most importantly, all products had to be on market prior to August 8, 2016, in order to be offered for legal retail sale.
The PMTA process has been called a “bureaucratic nightmare” and has effectively shuttered thousands of small businesses across the country. In 2020, due to a lawsuit brought on by Michael Bloomberg-funded nanny-state organizations, all manufacturers of deemed tobacco products were required to submit a PMTA to the FDA. Prior to the submission date, it was estimated by the FDA that the cost of each application would be $330,000 per product.
Because of high costs, and a significant amount of confusion from the federal regulator to small business owners, many manufacturers could not afford the costs of a PMTA. In September, 2021, the FDA swiftly denied nearly 1 million applications for non-tobacco flavored e-liquid products. As with many one-size-fits-all approaches from the federal government, the 2016 deeming rules did not take into consideration work arounds. For example, the rule did not cover nicotine derived from non-tobacco sources. In September 2021, after the federal government shut down businesses that had been on the market for at least six years, many manufacturers switched to synthetic nicotine.
In spring 2022, Congress, acting swiftly on vaping but little else, passed legislation enabling the FDA the authority to regulate nicotine – regardless of the source. Lawmakers went even further, requiring manufacturers to submit another PMTA in a 60-day period after the enactment of the legislation.
If FDA truly wants to limit the number of people using combustible cigarettes, the agency must reverse course on its regulatory handling of novel tobacco products. The costs to bring new products to market must not be astronomical and it should not be more difficult for consumers to find a pack of cigarettes than a tobacco harm reduction product.
BLOGS:
Monday: Where Biden’s Disastrous Policies Rue the Day: U.S. Virgin Islands ([link removed])
Tuesday: Overbuilding Broadband Networks Will Only Exacerbate Worker Shortage ([link removed])
Wednesday: The FDA’s Tiresome Tobacco Whack-A-Mole Game ([link removed])
Friday: Summer Reading: FDA and (Lack of) Access to Tobacco Harm Reduction ([link removed])
MEDIA:
August 11, 2022: The Telegraph ([link removed]) (Nashua, N.H.) ran TPA’s op-ed, “The FDA has a science problem – literally.”
August 12, 2022: The American Spectator ran TPA's op-ed, "The FDA’s Tiresome Tobacco Whack-A-Mole Game. ([link removed]) "
August 14, 2022: The News-Gazette ([link removed]) (Champaign, IL.) ran TPA’s op-ed, “The FDA has a science problem — literally.”
August 14, 2022: The Boston Herald quoted TPA in a piece titled, “Will new climate spending lower winter heating costs? ([link removed]) ”
August 15, 2022: WBFF Fox45 (Baltimore, Md.) interviewed me about the Maryland sales tax holiday.
August 15, 2022: I appeared on the Kevin McCullough Show ([link removed]) to talk about the Inflation Reduction Act.
August 15, 2022: WBFF Fox45 (Baltimore, Md.) interviewed me about a plan to raise taxes.
August 15, 2022: Townhall.com ran TPA’s op-ed, “New FCC Program Offers Spectrum Sharing Incentives to Help Bridge Digital Divide. ([link removed]) ”
August 16, 2022: WBFF Fox45 (Baltimore, Md.) interviewed me about C (http://) harm City's new income pilot program ([link removed]) .
August 16, 2022: The Livingston Parish News (Denham Springs, La.) ran TPA’s op-ed, “Price hikes, Medicare debt won’t deliver postal reform ([link removed]) .”
August 16, 2022:Inside Sources ([link removed]) ran TPA's op-ed, "Congress Wants to Expand IRS and Give It More of Your Info."
August 16, 2022: The NH Journal ([link removed]) ran TPA's op-ed, " Congress Wants to Expand IRS and Give It More of Your Info."
August 17, 2022: The Center Square ([link removed]) ran TPA’s op-ed, “The FDA’s problem with misinformation.”
August 18, 2022: WBFF Fox45 (Baltimore, Md.) interviewed me about the IRS hiring 87,000 new agents.
August 18, 2022: Issues & Insights ([link removed]) ran TPA's op-ed, "It’s The Culture Of The IRS To Target The Most Vulnerable Taxpayers."
August 18, 2022: The Telegraph (Nashua, N.H.) ran TPA's op-ed titled, "Congress wants to expand IRS and give it more of your info. ([link removed]) "
August 18, 2022: I appeared on WBOB 600 AM (Jacksonville, Fla.) to talk about the IRS and green energy.
August 18, 2022: The Delaware Valley Journal ([link removed]) (Delaware Valley, Penn.) ran TPA's op-ed, "Congress Wants to Expand IRS and Give It More of Your Info."
August 18, 2022: Prescott E-News (Prescott, Ariz.) ran TPA's op-ed, "Opinion: Congress Wants to Expand IRS and Give It More of Your Info. ([link removed]) "
Have a great weekend!
Best,
David Williams
President
Taxpayers Protection Alliance
1101 14th Street, NW
Suite 1120
Washington, D.C. xxxxxx
www.protectingtaxpayers.org ([link removed])
============================================================
** ([link removed])
** Like Us On Facebook ([link removed])
** ([link removed])
** Follow Us On Twitter ([link removed])
Our mailing address is:
1101 14th Street NW
Suite 1120
Washington, DC xxxxxx
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
