Alaska's moment finally happened. Here's what we know so far.
<[link removed]>
Hi Friend,
The game-changing moment for election reform, the day that you’d been hearing
us talk about for months, finally arrived on Tuesday. Voters had the
opportunity to participate in Alaska's new nonpartisan primary system, which
included a top-four nonpartisan primary (in which the top four vote-getters
advance to the general) and a special ranked choice voting general election to
fill the seat of the late Rep. Don Young for the remainder of his term.
This landmark election comes at a critical time for the United States — the
worsening Primary Problem means this is the least representative electorate in
our nation’s history. So far this election season,only 6.6% of all eligible
voters have cast ballots in primaries effectively deciding 70.3% of Congress
<[link removed]>. This is fueling dysfunction,
distorting representation, and disenfranchising voters across the country, and
it’s why what Alaska is rolling out this election season is so momentous.
We are at a critical juncture as a nation, a crossroads, if you will — Alaska
is paving the way for landmark election reform, and other states are watching.
Already there are other efforts underway in dozens of states to push forward on
fixing the system, and as this primary season has already shown, it can’t come
soon enough.
Here are three things to consider this week:
Alaska Primary Day — A New Model for the Nation
<[link removed]>
Media outlets have posed the following questions for months: Can Alaska save
democracy?
<[link removed]>
The answer is, that it’s a major step in the right direction. Regardless of
the results from Alaska’s primary this past Tuesday, thanks to the new reform,
we already know that the winner will represent who the majority of Alaska
voters wanted to represent them. And remember: Be patient. The results from
Alaska’s milestone election have been coming in since the polls closed on
August 16th, and will continue to do so until August 31st as election officials
count every vote from across the vast state and from the overseas military.
This extended post-election period is due to a longstanding statute we spoke to
last week <[link removed]> to help
ensure every vote is counted.
But we don’t need to wait for the official results to see how the system in
Alaska is already resulting in a more representative candidate pool making it
to the general election. How do we know this already? Well, we can look now to
another state that held a primary this week — Wyoming.
<[link removed]>
<[link removed]>
Wyoming’s Primary Election — The Primary Problem on Display
<[link removed]>
While from different parts of the country, Republicans Senator Lisa Murkowski
(AK) and Congresswoman Liz Cheney (WY) have one distinct thing in common —
during their previous terms both had become outliers to Republicans after
breaking from the party-line and, in turn, both faced tough primaries.
<[link removed]>
What was the outcome? Representative Cheney lost her race — yet, Sen.
Murkowski is still in the running in Alaska,
<[link removed]>
leading the primary field as of this writing. So, what led to these
dramatically different race results? The answer lies in the difference between
how Alaska and Wyoming conduct their primaries.
Alaska’s Nonpartisan Primary: Alaska’s new nonpartisan primary system passed
by voters in 2020 is open to all age-eligible voters. Every candidate runs on
the same ballot rather than in separate by-party primaries. This allows voters
to vote for any candidate of their choosing regardless of party affiliation.
The result? It creates greater competition and more choices — Alaska saw 19
candidates run in the Senate primary, including Murkowski, while 48 candidates
ran for the U.S. House seat in the special election. Coupled with a ranked
choice voting general election, Alaskans have also eliminated the spoiler
effect. So, in a state that typically votes red, voters will have multiple
choices instead of just one and the whole state will have their say. Contrast
that with Wyoming …
Wyoming’s Semi-Open Primary: On the other hand, Wyoming conducted a semi-open,
party-run primary. In this system, voters aren’t able to choose from among all
the candidates and must decide in which party’s primary to participate (and in
deep red Wyoming, whoever wins the Republican primary is guaranteed to win the
general). In contrast to Alaska’s U.S. House election, Wyoming only had 8
primary candidates in the running and thousands of voters were barred from
participating in the party primary of consequence.
<[link removed]>
<[link removed]>
A Tale of Two Primaries <[link removed]>
On Monday, the New York Times ed board linked the Wyoming-Alaska connection to
underscore their take on why political bravery is in such short supply in
America
<[link removed]>
, noting that“Ms. Murkowski is still one of the most vulnerable Senate
Republicans in this year’s elections, but Alaska’s system gives her a chance to
be judged by all the voters there, rather than registered Republicans alone.”
And on Tuesday night,Nick Troiano, our Executive Director, summed up the
contrasting primaries during his interview on MSNBC’s “The 11th Hour.”
<[link removed]>
<[link removed]>
<[link removed]>
<[link removed]>
Best Regards,
Alana
__
Alana Persson
Digital Marketing Associate
Unite America
DONATE <[link removed]>
Want to stop receiving our weekly Three Things Thursday emails? Unsubscribe
<[link removed]>
from Three Things Thursday, orUnsubscribe
<[link removed]>
from all Unite America communications.
Unite America | 1580 Lincoln St Suite #520 Denver, CO 80203
Paid for by Unite America PAC INC.
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.
www.uniteamerica.org <[link removed]>
