The Latest from the Prospect
 ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌
 
AUGUST 17, 2022
Kuttner on TAP
Liz Cheney Product Warning Label
How her crusade against Trump could backfire against Democrats and progressives
Liz Cheney has won the hearts of many liberals because of her outstanding role in the January 6th hearings. Having lost her own House seat, she now has one goal—to keep Donald Trump from the White House.

The Boston Globe describes her as every Democrat’s favorite Republican. Some progressives are relishing the prospect of Cheney running as a third-party spoiler. But that gambit could backfire in several respects.

For starters, let’s remember who Liz Cheney is. Substantively, she’s still a right-wing Republican who has supported policies of endless war; and until she became a born-again constitutionalist, she voted with Trump 90 percent of the time.

Even knowing that she was about to lose her seat, Cheney did not alter her views. She voted against banning assault weapons, voted for letting veterans die from illnesses created by toxic burn pits by voting against the PACT Act, and voted for denying climate science when she voted against the Inflation Reduction Act.

In her crusade against Trump, it doesn’t work for Cheney to run as a Republican. She’d serve as a foil to energize Trump’s base and help him win the nomination.

Her more logical path is as an independent. At first glance, that course sounds like a winner—for democracy and for Democrats. Cheney takes 10 or even 20 percent of the vote, mostly from the Republican, and throws the election to the Democrat. But be careful what you wish for.

Cheney has become such a heroic figure that she could also take plenty of votes from the Democrat. If it’s Trump against Biden, she’s a far more effective debater than either, and more than two decades younger.

The dynamics of three-way races are inherently volatile and unstable. In 1992, when Ross Perot ran as an independent, there were several weeks when Perot was outpolling both Clinton and George H.W. Bush.

In the end, Perot got 19 percent of the vote and threw the election to Clinton. But it easily could have broken the other way. Had he been a little less crazy, Perot might have won.

In 2016, an outsider-insider celebrity businessman candidate even crazier than Perot did win. And in 2000, independent Ralph Nader pulled only 2.7 percent but gained just enough votes to tip the election to George W. Bush.

Cheney is a widely admired figure at a time when voters are hostile to both parties. In a true three-way, almost anything could happen. Cheney might even win.

Alternatively, if she took some states but ran third, Cheney might throw the election to the Republican House. That ironic echo of Trump’s January 6th strategy would be grotesque.

My wager is that Cheney will run as an independent—and as she gets energized by the excitement of the race, she will run to win. Though it’s a long shot, here’s the worst irony of all: Should Cheney win, we might rescue democracy only to be back to the right-wing corporate rule that left working people disgusted with democracy in the first place.
~ ROBERT KUTTNER
New York Times Faces Backlash Over Dan Goldman Endorsement Debacle
There are ties between the families of Goldman and Times publisher A.G. Sulzberger, who took an interest in the endorsement. BY DAVID DAYEN, ALEXANDER SAMMON & RYAN GRIM
How Faux-Progressive Starbucks Is Fighting Unionization
Denying raises to its unionized baristas appears to be an effective, if illegal, tactic—at least, until the NLRB clamps down on it. BY STEVEN GREENHOUSE
DeJoy’s Continued Job Security Depends on Biden’s Next Move
Two more members of the Postal Service Board of Governors finish their terms in December. Biden could replace them with members willing to fire the postmaster general. BY DAVID DAYEN
There Are ‘No Real Consequences’ for Toxic Emissions Events
In some cases, these ‘chemical releases’ aren’t illegal. In others, state regulators give polluters the benefit of the doubt. BY SAVANNA STROTT
 
Click to Share this Newsletter
Facebook
 
Twitter
 
Linkedin
 
Email
A MESSAGE FROM A PROSPECT PARTNER
Today, corporate narratives dominate our media.
Want an alternative?

Welcome to OptOut, a free news aggregation app for independent media you can trust. Read, listen, and watch content about democracy, climate, justice, labor, and other topics that matter from voices that the corporate media overlooks. On OptOut, you can find Prospect stories alongside your other favorite outlets. Download the iOS app today and sign up for OptOut's free newsletter.
 
The American Prospect, Inc.
1225 I Street NW, Suite 600
Washington, DC xxxxxx
United States
Copyright (c) 2022 The American Prospect. All rights reserved.

To opt out of American Prospect membership messaging, click here.
To manage your newsletter preferences, click here.
To unsubscribe from all American Prospect emails, including newsletters, click here.