To view this email as a web page, click here

.
AEI's weekly digest of top commentary and scholarship on the issues that matter most

Inside the Inflation Reduction Act

The Book Minimum Tax Is Still a Bad Idea

August 6, 2022

Kyle Pomerleau criticizes the Inflation Reduction Act's proposed 15 percent tax on corporations that report a net income of more than $1 billion. Pomerleau says the tax may create an incentive for misreporting income and expenses and could even distort corporate income tax collection more broadly. He identifies how these flaws and others could prevent the policy from fulfilling its proponents' intent.

 

 

In a letter to a roundtable of Republican members of the House Committee on Ways and Means, Beth Akers warns of the effects of broad student loan forgiveness. Akers contends that it will send the same message to borrowers as a bailout and that "the resulting increased willingness to pay will allow institutions to raise their prices further, thus exacerbating already troubling levels of tuition inflation."

 

Writing in the Wall Street Journal, Phil Gramm and Mike Solon outline the lessons that policymakers should learn from the Great Inflation of 1973–81. Gramm and Solon argue that President Joe Biden continues to make mistakes similar to those of that era's presidents, who failed to control inflation.

 

Michael Rubin proposes three ways to revise US strategy toward the Islamic Republic of Iran and strengthen our deterrence of Iranian aggression. "There is no magic formula to resolve disputes with Iran, nor are there shortcuts," writes Rubin. "But first, it is important to drop the strategies that do more harm than good."

 

On Wednesday, August 3, Phillip Swagel, director of the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), came to AEI for a conversation about the CBO's long-term budget outlook with James C. Capretta. After their conversation, AEI's Joseph Antos and Mark J. Warshawsky, as well as the Brookings Institution's Louise Sheiner, sat down for a panel discussion on the subject.

What Is the Future of Public Housing in America's Cities?

In a new report, Howard Husock asks, "What is the future of public housing in American cities?" While acknowledging how past public housing programs have failed their beneficiaries, Husock examines the costs that housing projects continue to incur on America's cities. Viewing public housing as "a government-owned property asset whose value can be significant but is frozen," he proposes that their frozen value imposes high costs on growing and gentrifying cities. Allowing sales of high-value developments, he posits, would unlock this frozen value and benefit cities. He finds that 47 percent of housing projects are now located in "low- or moderate-poverty areas," and in New York City, one housing development could have a sale value of $564,000 per unit. Husock outlines "an approach in cities where high-value public housing sites are found and both municipalities and tenants would benefit" from sales in the near future.

 

 

More from AEI
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY

Uncertainty over Pelosi's Taiwan Visit Exposes American Weakness

Gary J. Schmitt and Ellen Bork
Dispatch

What Zawahiri's Death Means for al Qaeda

Katherine Zimmerman
AEIdeas

Monkeypox Is About to Become the Next Public Health Failure

Scott Gottlieb
New York Times

Can We Resist the Age of the Algorithm?

Ross Douthat
New York Times

The Increasingly Irrelevant Federal Unemployment Trust Funds

Matt Weidinger
AEIdeas

PODCASTS AND VIDEOS

What Role Should Congress Have in Foreign Affairs?

Kevin R. Kosar and Alissa Ardito
Understanding Congress

How PayPal Laid the Groundwork for Silicon Valley as We Know It

Shane Tews and Jimmy Soni
Explain to Shane

Entering the War's New Phase

Giselle Donnelly, Dalibor Rohac, and Iulia Joja
The Eastern Front

Vikram Mansharamani on How to Stop Outsourcing Your Opinions and Relearn Critical Thinking

Brent Orrell and Vikram Mansharamani
Hardly Working

Empowering Women Through the Choice of Adoption

Naomi Schaefer Riley and Ian Rowe
Are You Kidding Me?

QUOTE OF THE WEEK

Although many will see West Va. v. EPA as the Court flexing its conservative muscles, it is better seen as an attempt by the Court to restore the original constitutional structure in which Congress makes the policy decisions that underlie the laws. In doing so, it will end a century of judicial support for a form of progressivism that has driven the growth of the administrative state.

Peter J. Wallison