Aug. 4, 2022
Permission to republish original opeds and cartoons granted.
Biden's weaponization of the FTC
By Richard Manning
The Federal Trade Commission’s website states, “Our mission is protecting consumers and competition by preventing anticompetitive, deceptive, and unfair business practices through law enforcement, advocacy, and education without unduly burdening legitimate business activity.”
The Biden FTC, led by Chair Lina Khan, in its rush to run roughshod over companies, has forgotten about the “without unduly burdening legitimate business activity” part of its mandate. Under Ms. Khan, the FTC is attempting to fundamentally transform our economy by doing away with the traditions and rules designed to prevent this powerful agency from injecting politics into its decision-making. It is actually more than happy to impose undue burdens on business, launching cases against high-profile companies and industries to gain headlines and advance a regulatory agenda.
A July 2021 FTC news release admits, “The amendments make changes to the Commission’s procedure for initiating rulemaking proceedings, and the process by which members of the public can seek an informal hearing in a rule-making. For example, under the revised rules, informal hearing procedures make it easier for stakeholders to participate.”
In the parlance of the left and its “corporate social responsibility” agenda, a stakeholder is an activist group with little to no interest in the company’s bottom line attempting to use the power of government to coerce a company to take actions adverse or at odds to its fiduciary interests.
The objective of Ms. Khan’s FTC is clear: punish businesses who fall out of line with left-wing orthodoxy using the litigation power granted to the agency by Congress.
Rather than working within the constructs of bipartisan tradition, which assures both continuity of policy and direction, Ms. Khan has chosen a path of weaponizing an agency with the power to destroy a corporation under the guise of consumer protection. She overturned the agency’s long-standing merger guidelines over the vocal objections of the two Republican-appointed commissioners and many experts.
Those two commissioners have vocally criticized the Khan-led agency for “overstepping decades of precedent and the agency’s legal authority” as she pushed through aggressive changes by narrow partisan 3-2 votes. Ms. Khan has gone further than just changing the rules, she used the votes of a commissioner who had already left the FTC — in what many labeled zombie voting.
So, predictably, the Khan FTC jumped into the fray when Elon Musk announced his intent to takeover Twitter. The FTC didn’t care if Twitter itself was cooking the books in its reporting of how many actual, real live users they have, but instead chose to evaluate whether it posed antitrust concerns.
Earth to Ms. Khan: Unless Twitter is going to suddenly be competing in the rocket ship or electric vehicle markets, no reasonable person would see this purchase as having antitrust concerns. But the Khan FTC isn’t reasonable, and it interjected itself into Mr. Musk’s business, perhaps at the behest of the chair’s former employer, the Open Market Institute, to send a message and throw regulatory sand in the gears.
And with gasoline prices through the roof due to President Biden’s draconian anti-domestic energy policies combined with his funding Iranian terrorist proxies who are attacking the world’s largest oil supplier, Saudi Arabia, Ms. Khan’s FTC is jumping into the fray investigating oil companies for price gouging.
In the mind of the George Soros acolyte, investigating those with the means to drill our way out of this Biden Green New Crisis makes a ton of sense.
Just in case you might think that Ms. Khan’s war on corporate America is restricted to the rogue Mr. Musk and the always maligned oil companies, she has launched a dubious lawsuit against Walmart — for the actions of other companies — through a partisan 3-2 vote. Ms. Khan’s FTC has decided to move forward in spite of the fact that the Department of Justice declined to act on the exact set of facts. But plunge ahead Ms. Khan must, due process be damned.
But America be assured. The ravenous Soros-funded stakeholders are undoubtedly happy.
They have their social justice warrior, Ms. Khan, relentlessly serving as a regulatory and legal attack dog against those they perceive as their political enemies freed from the constraints of bipartisan accountability.
The 21 GOP senators and the few Democrats who claim to be moderate who voted in favor of unleashing the wrath of the FTC onto America owe us a big apology as Ms. Khan’s FTC makes it its mission to unduly burden legitimate business activity in America.
Richard Manning is the President of Americans for Limited Government.
To view online: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/aug/3/bidens-weaponization-of-the-ftc/
Video: Nancy Pelosi Refused to Back Down to Tyrannical Chinese Communist Party and Visited Taiwan Anyway
To view online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Np3qbYvca8
Job openings have crashed 1.1 million since March in yet another recession signal
By Robert Romano
Job openings have crashed by more than 1.1 million since March to about 10.7 million, appearing to signal an imminent uptick in the unemployment rate over the coming months and perhaps years depending on the severity of the current recession, an analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Job Openings and Labor Turnover (JOLT) survey and household survey data showing an inverse relationship between the growth rate of job openings and unemployment.
Generally, in a recession — or the last 12 times in economic history the Bureau of Economic Analysis reported consecutive quarters of negative growth like the last two quarters — once jobs losses in the household survey begin rising, the unemployment rate will tend to rise as well.
But that only seems to happen when job openings crater by more than 20 percent in the JOLT survey on an annual basis, as in the 2001 and 2008-2009 recessions. So far, they are down approximately 9.75 percent from March to June, but from a year ago they’re actually still up 9 percent but that will soon change amid the current precipitous decline.
In short, employers slow down hiring before they begin firing. It’s why job losses are always the last thing to come in a recession, but in truth, they’ve already turned up in the household survey in April and June, which both posted respective jobs losses of about 300,000 apiece, which was slightly offset by a 300,000 gain in those reporting they were employed in May.
Now all eyes turn to the Aug. 5 jobs report due tomorrow for the month of July when the unemployment rate will be updated. But even if it is flat this month, the overall trend appears to be pointed towards an eventual, perhaps inevitable rise in unemployment.
In the meantime, weekly unemployment claims continued their months-long slow climb to 260,000 from a mid-March low of 166,000 in the latest Department of Labor report. That’s precisely when job openings peaked in the JOLT survey, too. That’s the inverse relationship at work, and the trend towards temporary joblessness taking hold.
Now, what remains unknown is the magnitude of upheaval in labor markets, a factor which might not be known for several months — something, incidentally the Biden administration is counting on as the November Congressional midterm elections rapidly approach.
All the JOLT survey seems to be saying in this particular analysis is to expect the unemployment rate to go up, but not noticeably higher until job openings have cratered by more than 20 percent for a period of about twelve months. How high is anyone’s guess and perhaps depend on the extent of the damage being caused by the current supply crisis and inflation scourges to business bottom lines.
There were times during the Obama administration when jobs openings would briefly crater to 0 percent or slight negative growth in job openings, but never into recession territory. It needs to be a sustained decline. Once it is, all bets are off.
In any event, the Biden administration’s hoped for exception to the rule might not be much more than wishful thinking ahead of a brutal election season where a clear majority of Americans already think we’re in a recession anyway. Hopefully, it’s a mild one, which might be about the most optimistic appraisal that we might expect out of Washington, D.C. over the next several months. Stay tuned.
Robert Romano is the Vice President of Public Policy at Americans for Limited Government Foundation.
To view online: https://dailytorch.com/2022/08/job-openings-have-crashed-1-1-million-since-march-in-yet-another-recession-signal/