Hi, Evidence uncovered by the January 6 committee shows that Ginni Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, was a central figure in Trump’s attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election. She personally lobbied state legislators to approve fake electors. She sent 29 text messages to White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows in the run-up to January 6, urging him to support efforts to overturn the election.1 She even attended the Stop the Steal rally on January 6 before the attack on the U.S. Capitol.2 And yet Clarence Thomas has refused to recuse himself from cases related to the January 6 attack that could directly implicate his wife — even as she faces a possible subpoena to force her to testify about her actions around the January 6 insurrection.3 The Thomases can get away with this only because the Supreme Court is the only court in the land that doesn’t have a code of ethics requiring judges to recuse themselves when facing a conflict of interest. That needs to change right now. Tens of thousands of Demand Progress Action members have already contacted Congress, and now we need to turn up the heat. If you've saved your payment information with ActBlue Express, your donation will go through immediately:
There’s simply no way the public can trust Justice Thomas to rule impartially on any case related to the January 6 insurrection. In fact, his ruling on another case shows that he won’t: he was the only justice to dissent in the Supreme Court’s decision to reject Trump’s request to withhold documents from the January 6 committee.4 But this isn’t just about Justice Thomas. The nine justices appointed for life to the Supreme Court make their own rules and scorn transparency. They’ve helped make the judiciary the most powerful and least accountable branch of government. They don’t have even the most basic rules against conflicts of interest. That’s why we’re pushing to pass the Judicial Ethics and Anti-Corruption Act, which would require the Supreme Court to adopt a code of ethics, prevent justices from owning stocks, and more.5 It’s a long-overdue, common-sense move toward restoring legitimacy to the court. Thanks for standing with us, Sources: PAID FOR BY DEMAND PROGRESS (DemandProgress.org) and not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. Contributions are not deductible as charitable contributions for federal income tax purposes. Join our online community on Facebook or Twitter. You can unsubscribe from this list at any time. |