Judicial Watch announced recently it received 112 pages from
the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that show top officials being
pressured by “companies and, for that matter the Administration, who try
to impose timeless [sic] that make no sense.”
|
|
Because no one is above
the law! |
Aug 1, 2022 |
|
|
|
Today's Top Stories
|
|
|
|
Judicial Watch Files FOIA Lawsuit for NIH Emails of Dr.
Fauci’s Spouse, Christine Grady
Judicial Watch announced recently
that it has filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for the emails of
National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) chief of the Clinical Center’s
Department of Bioethics Christine Grady referencing the COVID-19 vaccine
and antibody enhancement. Grady is the spouse of Dr. Anthony Fauci,
director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
READ MORE
|
|
|
|
|
|
Judicial Watch Sues for Naval Academy Critical Race
Theory Records
“Marxist Critical Race Theory
and its racial division have no place in the Naval Academy, which is
training the next generations of Navy leadership,” said Judicial Watch
President Tom Fitton. “That the Pentagon has been unlawfully hiding
these records for a year suggests something awful is afoot.”
READ MORE
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Launches Website to Reduce Extreme Heat Health
Risks Among Vulnerable Populations
While American families struggle
during record-high inflation and a looming recession, the Biden
administration celebrates the launch of a government website dedicated to
heat and loaded with costly federal resources. Specifically, the new site,
heat.gov, aims to reduce the health risks of extreme heat by providing the
public and decision-makers with timely information. Not surprisingly, the
administration has assessed that minorities and the poor, as well as the
“highly diverse” LGBTQIA+ communities, are disproportionately impacted
by heat-related health issues and therefore it had that demographic in mind
when launching the project.
READ MORE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Judge Rules
That Gender Quotas for Corporate Board Members Violate the California
Constitution
The National Law Review
Judge
Duffy-Lewis found that Judicial Watch had satisfied their burden of
proof—that Judicial Watch needed to and did prove that the law was
“presumptively unconstitutional” and “men and women are similarly
situated for purposes of SB 826’s gender-based quota.” The burden then
shifted to the state to prove that there was “(1) a compelling state
interest, (2) that SB 826 is necessary and (3) that SB 826 is narrowly
tailored.”
READ MORE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keep our investigators on the job uncovering the truth:
|
|
|
|
|
|