Judicial Watch Files Lawsuit for
OpentheBooks.com for Employment/Financial Records of Christine Grady,
Spouse of Anthony Fauci
A lot of money flows
through the National Institutes of Health, including dollars that benefit
its scientists, and American taxpayers should know the details because they
are subject to the bureaucrats’ edicts.
At the center of many controversies is Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, part of the NIH. Few
know that his wife, Christine
Grady, also works for the NIH. She serves as chief of the Clinical
Center’s Department of Bioethics.
What is her role? How much are we paying her?
The NIH won’t say, of course, so we filed a lawsuit on behalf of American
Transparency (OpenTheBooks.com) against the Department of Health and Human
Services. (American
Transparency, d/b/a/ OpenTheBooks.com v. U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services (No. 1:22-cv-02021)).
We sued after HHS failed to respond to an April 8 FOIA request from
OpenTheBooks.com to the NIH asking for records regarding Grady:
- All employment contracts, modifications and addendums regarding
Christine Grady, MSN, PhD, since her hiring as Chief of the Department of
Bioethics.
- Any confidentiality agreements/documents, conflict of interest waivers
or documents, ethics disclosures, and financial and/or economic interest
disclosure documents.
- Grady’s current job description.
OpenTheBooks.com
is the largest private repository of records of United States public-sector
spending. Its mission is to post online all publicly available government
spending: “every dime, online, in real time.”
Our lawsuit asks the court to require the department to search for and
produce all responsive records and order the department to stop withholding
non-exempt records related to the FOIA request.
“Once again, NIH is using taxpayer dollars to avoid transparency, and
leaving us no choice but to enter litigation that will also burden the
taxpayer,” said Adam Andrzejewski, CEO and founder of OpenTheBooks.com.
“It’s time for NIH to stop routinely hiding information as simple as a
job description and embrace basic transparency. We thank our friend at
Judicial Watch for helping us get the answers we deserve.”
An October 2021 lawsuit
we have for OpenTheBooks.com against HHS asks for Anthony Fauci’s
employment contracts; financial, conflict of interest, and confidentiality
disclosure documents; and job description, as well as royalties paid to NIH
employees by outside entities. In May 2022, the lawsuit uncovered
that over a 10-year period, Fauci and others at NIH received more than $350
million in secretive “royalty” payments from drug companies and other
third parties.
So, you can see why we have good reason to believe that these financial
disclosure records will give Americans a more complete picture of the
conflicts of interest that have compromised NIH—and Dr. Fauci. That our
client had to file a federal lawsuit to gain access to this basic
information speaks volumes.
Judicial Watch Sues Secret Service for Hunter Biden Travel and
Security Records
The Secret Service is covering for Hunter Biden.
We just filed a FOIA lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) for Secret Service hidden records on Hunter Biden’s travel
and security costs. (Judicial
Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (No.
1:22-cv-02097)).
We sued after the Secret Service (a component of DHS) failed to respond
adequately to three separate FOIA requests in March and April 2022 for:
- All records concerning the use of security and/or other services to
Hunter Biden and any companions; and
- All records concerning the use of U.S. Government funds to provide
security and/or any other services to Hunter Biden and any
companions.
The Secret Service is violating FOIA law by slow-rolling and hiding Hunter
Biden records. What are they trying to hide?
We have some idea because in June 2020, we received
records from the U.S. Secret Service showing that during the first
five-and-a-half years of the Obama administration, Hunter Biden traveled
extensively while receiving a Secret Service protective detail. During the
time period of the records provided, Hunter Biden took 411 separate
domestic and international flights, including to 29 different foreign
countries. He visited China five times.
The Secret Service records showed that countries and territories visited by
Hunter Biden, between June 2009 and May 2014, included:
- Ethiopia and India on June 14-22, 2009
- Argentina on September 14-17, 2009
- France and Spain on November 9-13, 2009
- Canada on February 12-15, 2010
- Dominican Republic on February 18-22, 2010
- Puerto Rico on March 20-27, 2010
- China on April 6-9, 2010
- Belgium, Spain, and the United Kingdom on May 5-8, 2010
- UK, Egypt, Kenya, South Africa, Ascension Island, U.S. Virgin Islands
on June 6-13, 2010
- Denmark and South Africa on August 9-24, 2010
- Hong Kong, Taiwan and China on April 16-22, 2011
- Mexico on May 15-17, 2011
- Colombia, France, United Arab Emirates and France again on November
1-11, 2011
- UK and Russia on February 15-18, 2012
- Germany, France and UK on February 1-5, 2013
- UK and Ireland on March 20-22, 2013
- China on June 13-15, 2013
- Switzerland and Italy on July 26-August 7, 2013
- Japan, China, South Korea and the Philippines on December 2-9,
2013
- China and Qatar on May 7-14, 2014
According to reports,
then-Vice President Joe Biden and Hunter Biden flew on Air Force Two for an
official trip to Beijing in December 2013. The records obtained by Judicial
Watch from the Secret Service show Hunter Biden arrived in Tokyo on
December 2, 2013, and departed for Beijing two days later. While it is
typical for the families of the president and vice president to travel with
them, questions have been raised about whether Hunter Biden used the
government trip to further his business interests.
I’ll report back to you if and when we get documents on Hunter’s latest
activities!
HHS Pays $40k to Study Why Kids “Favor Whiteness and
Maleness”
Critical race theory is everything in the Biden administration, and
showering taxpayer dollars on academics to push is exposed by our
Corruption Chronicles blog -- which reports
the latest use – and abuse -- of your money.
In yet another racial equity venture funded by American taxpayers, a
private university is getting tens of thousands of dollars from the U.S.
government to study the “developmental trajectory of children’s beliefs
that white males—more so than black males, white females, or black
females—best exemplify a person.” The three-year research project, to
be conducted by academics at New York University (NYU), seeks to uncover
why kids “favor Whiteness and maleness over other identities,”
according to the grant
announcement issued by the Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS), the agency doling out the cash for the study.
The project is part of a broader HHS
Equity Action Plan designed to transform how the agency does business
in order “to concretely advance equity.” Under the overhaul a Minority
Health Social Vulnerability Index was launched to help identify racial and
ethnic communities at the greatest risk for disproportionate impact and
adverse outcomes due to COVID-19 and a Racial Equity in Postpartum Care
Challenge was created to reduce disparities and improve outcomes for
postpartum “Black or African American” women enrolled in Medicaid, the
government’s insurance program for the poor. HHS has also doled out millions
of dollars to “minority-serving institutions” charged with
strengthening COVID-19 vaccine confidence among racial and ethnic minority
groups as well as underserved communities.
In the agency’s latest racial equity endeavor, researchers at NYU will
receive more than $40,000 to study “societal assumptions regarding
typical personhood and their effects on reasoning development.” The HHS
grant announcement further specifies that the goal is to “uncover the
development processes by which children acquire the belief that white males
represent the default person—a pattern rooted in ideologies of
androcentrism (centering the experiences of men) and ethnocentricism
(centering the experiences of white people) prevalent in the United
States.” The document goes on to state that “despite national rises in
racial and gender diversity, white men remain vastly overrepresented across
a host of domains within the U.S., from media, to politics, to clinical
research.” That overrepresentation poses severe costs to the rest of
society, the nation’s health agency writes, identifying the victims as
“women of all races, men of color, and gender-nonconforming
individuals.”
The Biden administration is particularly concerned with embedded
disparities in health, where clinical trials have historically prioritized
the experiences, perspectives, and health outcomes of white men. “To
address this issue, we must understand when and how the tendency to view
white males as default people develops across childhood, as well as the
environmental factors that underlie this phenomenon,” the HHS grant
document states. Specifically, the government wants to know the
developmental trajectory by which children’s default representations of
people begin to favor whiteness and maleness over other identities, the
domains across which children activate a white male default to guide social
reasoning, and the sociocultural and ecological factors that can prevent
the development of those beliefs. “Young children actively construct
knowledge to make sense of their social environments,” according to the
grant document. “As part of this process, children absorb complex streams
of information from the sources around them, including parents, peers, and
broader societal institutions (e.g., media).” HHS proceeds to explain
that the beliefs children acquire tend to reflect the dominant ideologies
embedded in their specific cultural contexts. In the U.S., those ideologies
include the previously mentioned “androcentrism and
ethnocentrism.”
The taxpayer-funded researchers are expected to clarify the scope of
children’s beliefs about who best exemplifies a person by testing the
consistency of the belief across domains and uncovering the features of
children’s sociocultural and ecological environments that underlie
beliefs about who best exemplifies a person. “The diversity afforded by
this platform allows us to capture a holistic picture of the phenomenon in
question and the mechanisms underlying it, broadening both the empirical
rigor and real-world impacts of our findings,” according to HHS. It will
only cost American taxpayers $40,391, though the agency could obligate more
funding at any time.
Until next week,
|