Des Moines Register: Quota for nominating panel deprives Iowans of opportunities

 

In Iowa, qualified candidates for the State Judicial Nominating Commission are being rejected because of their gender. The state’s gender quota requires an equal number of male and female commissioners—which means some open seats are available only to men, some only to women.

Wen Fa argues that the government’s obsession with proportional group representation is threatening individual opportunity.

read more

The Hill: Federal agencies lay the groundwork to ignore the Supreme Court

 

In Weyerhaeuser v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Supreme Court held that land designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as “critical habitat” under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) must be habitable for the species the agency seeks to protect.

But the agency has jettisoned the rule defining “habitat” that it adopted to comply with the ruling.

Frank Garrison and Charles Yates warn that in doing so, it undermined the Supreme Court, ignored the Constitution’s separation of powers, and laid the groundwork for other agencies do the same in the future.

read more

Apocalypse not: What West Virginia v. EPA really means

 

On July 5, Axios not-so-subtly warned us that “the Supreme Court’s next target is the executive branch.” The Guardian’s headline was even more stark: “The U.S. Supreme Court has declared war on the Earth’s future.”

With headlines like these, in reactions to the Court’s decision in West Virginia v. EPA, you might think we’re experiencing the end times.

Not so, writes Jim Burling, explaining why these critics are wrong: The EPA took power it didn’t have. The Court merely gave that power back to Congress, where it belongs.

read more

SCOTUSblog: With Justice Breyer’s retirement, the Court loses a pragmatist (and some laughs)

 

Anastasia Boden and Elizabeth Slattery reflect on the career of now-retired Justice Stephen Breyer, who sided with PLF in four Supreme Court cases involving property rights or environmental law. He didn’t care about neat lines, Boden and Slattery write. He cared about practicalities.

read more

share thoughts on Social Media:

        

Copyright © 2022 Pacific Legal Foundation, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website, at an event, or on Facebook.

Our mailing address is:

Pacific Legal Foundation

555 Capitol Mall Suite 1290
Sacramento, CA 95814

If you'd like to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, visit our email preferences center.