From Kea at Strong Towns <[email protected]>
Subject We're not bringing sexy back. We're bringing Strong Towns back.
Date December 9, 2019 4:16 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
John,

Not long ago, I was listening to an opening keynote address at a conference about how to make our cities better. I go to a lot of these kinds of things. But this time, one commonly-repeated phrase stuck out at me:

“Doing this work isn’t sexy.”

Huh, that was weird, I thought. This particular keynote was about reducing traffic fatalities on our streets. Why was anyone talking about sex?

Before that morning, I never even noticed that the word “sexy” was such a large part of the average urbanist’s vocabulary. Then suddenly, it seemed like everyone I met was talking about "sexy" skyscrapers. "Unsexy" road maintenance projects. The "super-sexy" new Tesla design.

Once you start noticing "sexy" in our conversations about how to build better places, you can't stop noticing it. And once you grasp what a problem this particular word is, you may never want to say it again.

I wrote an essay about why I'm not using the word "sexy" anymore—and what it means for my Strong Towns advocacy.

[link removed]

Give it a read and let me know: are you ready to start calling "unsexy" projects what they actually are: the most vital things we can do to make our places strong?



Website

[link removed]

| Twitter

[link removed]

|

[link removed]

Facebook

[link removed]



[link removed]

| Slack

[link removed]

| Become a member

[link removed]

1511 Northern Pacific Rd. Rm 206

Brainerd, MN 56401

If email from us is no longer your thing, we respect that. You can always change your email preferences

[link removed]

.
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis

  • Sender: Strong Towns
  • Political Party: n/a
  • Country: United States
  • State/Locality: n/a
  • Office: n/a
  • Email Providers:
    • Pardot
    • Litmus