New DEI curriculum standards impose radical ideology on American medical schools
[link removed]
CounterCurrent:
The AAMC Prescribes a
Daily Dose of DEI
New DEI competencies impose radical ideology on American medical schools
CounterCurrent is the National Association of Scholars’ weekly newsletter, bringing you the biggest issues in academia and our responses to them.
[link removed]
Category: Medical Education; Reading Time: ~2 minutes
------------------------------------------------------------
** Featured Article - "Association of American Medical Colleges Releases Official DEI Curriculum Standards" by John D. Sailer ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Back in March, I wrote to you ([link removed]) about the Association of American Medical Colleges’ (AAMC) proposed diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) curriculum standards, which threatened to curtail the academic freedom of medical students and faculty and to politicize medical education nationwide. At the time, the standards were only in draft form ([link removed]) , and it was still possible that the AAMC would reverse course, or at least tone down the language in response to the fierce criticism ([link removed]) the proposal received.
Of course, the odds of that happening were about as good as the odds I have of winning the lottery. And now, almost four months later exactly, I can report that the AAMC has done…(drumroll, please)…exactly what everyone expected and has left the DEI competencies virtually unchanged.
Yes, that’s right, the AAMC has completely ignored all criticism and has doubled-down on its radical agenda, consequences be damned.
The now-official curriculum standards take the form of “DEI competencies ([link removed]) ,” which outline the skills that are required at each stage of a physician’s education. Graduating medical students, for instance, must be able to “describe the impact of various systems of oppression on health and health care (e.g., colonization, White supremacy, acculturation, assimilation)” and to “demonstrate knowledge of the intersectionality of a patient’s identities and how each identity may result in varied and multiple forms of oppression or privilege.” Graduating residents are expected to go one step further by “promot[ing] social justice,” “engag[ing] in efforts to eliminate health care disparities,” and “practic[ing]...allyship.” To be deemed “competent,” medical school faculty must “role model anti-racism in medicine and teaching, including strategies grounded in critical underst
anding of unjust systems of oppression.”
The AAMC’s DEI competencies function as a guide rather than a mandate. However, medical schools across the country have shown that they are more than eager ([link removed]) to incorporate DEI programming into their curricula, helped along by organizations such as the AAMC—and prodded a bit more firmly ([link removed]) by accreditation bodies such as the Liaison Committee on Medical Education and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.
Mandatory or not, the AAMC’s new DEI competencies underscore the changing tides in medical education as a whole. In a joint op-ed ([link removed]) introducing the standards, AAMC President David Skorton and Chair of the AAMC Council of Deans Henri Ford declared that the topic of diversity, equity, and inclusion “deserves just as much attention from learners and educators at every stage of their careers as the latest scientific breakthroughs” [emphasis added]. It goes without saying that such a mindset threatens the integrity of medical science as a whole, regardless of how many schools implement the AAMC’s standards.
In this week’s featured article ([link removed]) , National Association of Scholars Research Fellow John D. Sailer, who broke the initial story about the DEI competencies back in March, outlines the threat the AAMC standards pose both to academic freedom and to American medical education. He writes:
Concepts such as “intersectionality” and “allyship” connote substantive political positions; to declare that faculty and students must embrace them clearly violates academic freedom. But perhaps more significantly, these concepts are often interpreted idiosyncratically to enforce a narrow and damaging orthodoxy. At medical schools that adopt the competencies, it will undoubtedly become harder for students and faculty to voice support for a meritocracy or skepticism toward “gender-affirming care” for minors. Such views, after all, are commonly labeled “oppressive.” …
The AAMC’s DEI competencies will hamper free expression, politicize medical education, encourage physicians to engage in misbegotten activism, and in the longer run, lead to substantively harmful policies. We should hope that students and faculty alike speak up and reject them.
America’s medical students—not to mention their patients—deserve more than a politically slanted education. The AAMC already passed on the opportunity to do better. Let’s hope that the students and faculty at America’s medical schools will step off the bandwagon and take a stand for our health.
Until next week.
Marina Ziemnick
Communications Associate
National Association of Scholars
P. S. Science is under siege at more than just medical schools. Even long-respected institutions such as the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have begun to abandon science in favor of radical ideology. To hear more about the plight of modern science, tune in to our webinar “Science in an Age of Unreason” this Friday at 3 pm ET. Register online today. ([link removed])
Read More ([link removed])
For more on DEI and American medical education:
[link removed]
March 22, 2022
** Where Medical Schools Go to DIE ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Marina Ziemnick
The onslaught against traditional medical education is not just a piecemeal effort: it is now being encouraged by top-down mandates from medical associations.
[link removed]
March 16, 2022
** AAMC to Propose DEI Curriculum Standards ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
John D. Sailer
The Association of American Medical Colleges plans to release “diversity, equity, and inclusion competencies” that will force students and faculty to embrace social justice activism.
[link removed]
January 11, 2022
** Riding the Coattails of Modern Medicine ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Marina Ziemnick
Let’s hope that America’s white coats resist the social justice siren song and remain dedicated to caring for patients’ medical needs first and foremost.
[link removed]
December 07, 2021
** UNC School of Medicine's Quiet DEI Revolution ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
John D. Sailer
For over a year, the subordination of healthcare to political aims has been underway at the UNC School of Medicine. We should hope the trend is reversed.
** About the NAS
------------------------------------------------------------
The National Association of Scholars, founded in 1987, emboldens reasoned scholarship and propels civil debate. We’re the leading organization of scholars and citizens committed to higher education as the catalyst of American freedom.
============================================================
Follow NAS on social media.
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
| ** Join ([link removed])
| ** Renew ([link removed])
| ** Bookstore ([link removed])
Copyright © 2022 National Association of Scholars, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website, membership or donation forms, contact forms at events, or by signing open letters.
Our mailing address is:
National Association of Scholars
420 Madison Avenue
7th Floor
New York, NY 10017-2418
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
