This Issue: House adds an amnesty to National Defense Authorization Act
Fri,
Jul. 15th
The House of Representatives approved adding an amnesty to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) on Thursday afternoon. The annual legislation that authorizes and establishes funding levels for the Department of Defense overwhelmingly passed the House by a 329-to-101 margin last night.
The amendment in question was co-introduced by Reps. Deborah Ross (D-N.C.) and Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-Iowa). It would carve out a loophole in the law for the children of foreign citizens who came to the United States on temporary work visas, but have applied for permanent status. Under current law, once the child of a temporary visa holder turns 21 years old, he or she is no longer considered a dependent for purposes of the parent's green card application. Rather than treat these young adults like any other aliens who have the opportunity to apply for any visa for which they qualify, the Ross amendment changes the law to pretend that they are still children dependent on their parents and allows them to stay in the United States indefinitely, despite statutory numerical caps.
The provision would allow for around 190,000 individuals -- who age out of legal status in the future -- to permanently stay and work in the U.S. Our Capitol Hill Team alerted Members of Congress that we would score against a vote in favor of the amendment and score against the final vote on NDAA should the amendment be approved:
The vast majority of young adults who would be affected by this amendment are the children of H-1B visa holders. ... Despite the plain text of the law, and amidst rampant and well-documented abuse of the existing program, amendments like these undermine the whole notion of temporary work programs by implying that those with temporary work visas have a right to stay permanently. They also make an end-run around the numerical limits enacted by Congress. ...
If Congress fails to vote down this amendment, NumbersUSA will have no choice but to score against final passage of the NDAA.
The amendment was wrapped into an "en bloc" amendment that included 136 additional amendments. House Leaders did this purposely to avoid any debate of the Ross/Miller-Meeks immigration amendment and ensure its passage. The en bloc vote passed 277-to-150. 70% of Republicans did oppose the en bloc vote that included the amendment, but most eventually supported the overall NDAA legislation despite the amendment being included.
NDAA could have been worse
Despite the addition of the Ross amendment, the National Defense Authorization Act could have been a lot worse.
Most notably, Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) filed an amendment that would have allowed foreign workers with an advanced degree in a STEM field and who work in national security to receive a green card and be exempt from annual numerical limitations. Thankfully, the House Rules Committee -- the committee tasked with establishing the rules for debate once legislation reaches the House floor -- determined that the amendment was out of order.
A number of smaller immigration-related amendments were also ruled out of order by the Rules Committee, including (1) granting amnesty to illegal-alien military spouses and (2) granting amnesty to certain Venezuelans.
Thanks to all of you who contacted your Representatives on the Rules Committee, urging them to block the immigration amendments from the defense bill.
What's next?
The Senate is working on its own version of the National Defense Authorization Act, but has yet to schedule a vote on the legislation. We've posted new actions on your Action Board urging your U.S. Senators to keep immigration provisions out of the NDAA during one of the worst border crises in history.
|
CHRIS Chmielenski NumbersUSA Deputy Director |
|