Top Lines:| Defeating COVID | Economy, Jobs | Political Analysis | Countering Illiberalism's Rise | Immigration, Border | Events | With Dems | Contribute | Newsletter |  Twitter | 

Update: Dems Hold 2.4 Point Lead in 13 Polls – All Talk of A Wave Needs to End

A few new polls have come out so we are updating our 2022 election analysis.

The average now of 13 independent polls taken since the end of Roe give Democrats a 2.4 point lead, 44.2 to 41.8.  This a 4-5 point swing towards the Democrats since mid June.  You can find these 13 polls and a bit more analysis below. 

Our current top election takeaways:

·       The election has moved 4-5 pts towards the Democrats, GOP brand has taken big hit

·       The anti-MAGA majority has been awakened

·       The Senate is now leaning Dem, NE special was encouraging for House Dems

·       The landscape is likely to get worse for GOP

In May we predicted that the combination of a return of mass shootings, the ending of Roe and the fallout from the Jan 6th Committee would reawaken the anti-MAGA majority and make this election much closer than many thought possible.  In Mid June we released an election analysis which argued we were already looking at a competitive not a wave election.  Then Roe ended, and NDN has been at the national forefront of charting what is now clearly a new, bluer election.    

We’ve put together our electoral work over the past few months into a 20 minute data-filled presentation, “A New, Bluer Election.”  You can watch it here.  We are also rolling out an updated version of With Democrats Things Get Better, our in-depth look at how the two US parties have fared over the past 30 years today at 2pm ET.  Register and learn more here.  

In recent weeks our election has analysis has been cited in new articles by John Harwood on the CNN site, Greg Sargent in the Washington Post, Peter Nicholas on the NBC News site, Susan Milligan in US News, Nicholas Riccardi in the AP, Eleanor Clift in The Daily Beast, John Skolnick in Salon, AB Stoddard in The xxxxxx and Peter Weber in The Week. Simon has done two in-depth discussions of our electoral thesis with Matt Lewis on his podcast and with Ian Masters for his radio show/podcast.  Joe Trippi discusses our analysis in his newest That Trippi Show podcast and we appreciate this shoutout from DNC Chair Jaime Harrison!

A new front page Washington Post story on the 2022 election by Michael Scherer, Coby Itkowitz and Josh Dawsey features this quote from Simon: “The question is, are there forces in the election more powerful than the disappointment in Biden?” asked Simon Rosenberg, a Democratic strategist. “The answer is yes, and that is opposition and fear for MAGA, which is the thing that has driven the last two elections.” Ron Brownstein also gives our big argument serious consideration in a new and comprehensive CNN analysis.  Greg Sargent devotes a whole column to our analysis, "Meet the Lonely Democrat Who Thinks His Party Can Win."

Importantly, in the last few days two of country’s most influential election analysts, Nate Cohn of the NYTimes and Nate Silver of FiveThirtyEight, have joined this may be a competitive election after all camp.  Nate Silver wrote “Instead, as voters have gathered more information about the race, they have drawn more of a distinction between how they feel about Biden and what they'd like to see happen in Congress. Maybe this trend will reverse itself. But the "fundamentalists"- the analysts who think the races for Congress are predictable based on presidential approval and other baseline conditions - have been wrong so far.”

As I discuss in the Greg Sargent column, another big piece of the strategic context for the 2022 election – the economy and inflation – has started to go through a profound and potentially electorally significant change.  Gas prices have dropped 45 cents in the past month and are dropping now 2-3 cents a day, every day.  This means that the huge psychological and economic effects of rising prices will certainly ease in the coming months.  It gives the Democrats an opening to broaden out the economic conversation to include their achievements – very strong recovery, big job gains, record new businesses formed, historically low uninsured/unemployment rates, infrastructure investments, etc.  And it will create more room for Democratic candidates to make the indictment of their opponents as too extreme, too MAGA.  As we’ve been saying, opposition to MAGA has been the driving force of the last two elections, and with mass shootings, the end of Roe and fanatical abortion restrictions, a radicalized Supreme Court, extremist/terrible candidates, an unfolding criminal conspiracy involving dozens of top Republican officials to overturn an election it is now likely to be the most powerful force in this election as well.  When the Republicans chose to run towards a politics the country had just rejected in record numbers twice, the GOP made the political physics of this election different from a traditional midterm.  It’s our view that as of today the Senate is likely to stay in Democratic hands; a pickup of a 1-2-3 Senate seats by Dems not impossible; and Democrats are likely to outperform expectations in the House now.  Will it be enough for Democrats to keep the House? We will see.  

In a new analysis, we also strongly dissent from the “Hispanics swinging to Rs” school.  

The 13 independent polls rated A/B from 538, Democrat/Republican

Yahoo/You Gov                 43-39

Economist/You Gov        43-40

NYT/Siena                         41-40

Politico/Morn Cons         46-42

Reuters/Ipsos                    34-35

YouGov/Economist          43-40

Big Village                          47-42

Harvard/Harris                 50-50

Emerson                             43-46

YouGov/Yahoo                  45-38

Monmouth                         46-48

Politico/Morn Cons          45-42

NPR/Marist                        48-41

For the purposes of this analysis, we do not include 3 partisan Republican polls, which are not independent polls and which, incredibly, show large GOP leads.  It is our guess that GOP pollsters, even those well intentioned, will struggle for a while to understand the very significant changes happening inside the Democratic electorate.  The likely explanation for how these polls could be 9-10 points off from 11 highly rated 538 polls is that they are holding on to a pre-Roe likely voter screen which has lower participation rates for Democrats.  We know from months of polling that ending Roe would significantly change voter intensity inside the Democratic electorate, and failure to account for and understand these changes by a pro-life party which has far fewer women and young people in its coalition is not something that should surprise anyone.  Republican after Republican commentator has said these last few weeks changes nothing.  They are clearly wrong, and these polls are also clearly wrong. 

It is a new, bluer election. 

Onward, Simon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                               

                                                                                                                                                                   
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Contributions or gifts to NDN are not deductible for federal tax purposes. Contributions or gifts to The New Policy Institute are tax-deductible. |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

800 Maine Avenue SW, Suite 200

Washington, DC 20024

www.ndn.org    @NDN_NPI

If you believe you received this message in error or wish to no longer receive email from us, please [link removed].