The Latest from the Prospect
 ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

 

View this email in your browser

**JULY 11, 2022**

New York's Democratic Primary Could Decide the Fate of Democrats' Big
Tech Push

BY ALEXANDER SAMMON

If Jerry Nadler loses, the House Judiciary Committee leadership would
likely go to Silicon Valley defender Zoe Lofgren.

It's rare enough to see a primary race run by two incumbents, and
rarer still to see a primary race with two incumbents who have served a
combined 59 years in office. That's the case in New York's new 12th
District
,
however, where Jerry Nadler, who has been in the House since 1992, is up
against Carolyn Maloney, who has been in the House since 1993.

The Upper West Side vs. Upper East Side of Manhattan showdown is one of
four Democrat-on-Democrat races keyed off by the redistricting cycle.
This one in New York has by far the most seniority on the line. But
it's also a race with surprisingly high stakes for the party's
ability to see through its signature, sweeping antitrust legislation,
which will remain a top priority for Democrats even after the midterms,
especially if they are unable to pass the American Innovation and Choice
Online Act before the legislative session is complete.

That bill, which was passed out of the Senate Judiciary Committee
earlier this year, would go to great lengths to rein in monopolistic
behavior exhibited by tech giants like Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and
Google. Under the proposed legislation, those firms would be forbidden
from giving preferential treatment to their own services in the
marketplaces they also operate, like when Google places its own travel
recommendations at the top of its search results, or Amazon ranks its
own goods first in product searches and disadvantages its competitors'
listings. Such behavior would be penalized at a rate that could amount
to 10
percent

of those firms' U.S. revenue.

The bill has been the object of intense lobbying

by Silicon Valley industry groups and affiliates, but has thus far
managed to survive as a robust and tone-setting package for an industry
that has enjoyed precious little meaningful scrutiny for years. The bill
is awaiting a full vote in the Senate, which has been anticipated for
months
.
If there are indeed 60 votes for it-the House version enjoyed
Republican support when it passed through committee, and there are
multiple Senate Republican co-sponsors-it will then need to return to
the House for a full vote before becoming law.

But time pressure is mounting, and not just from the possibility of a
Republican takeover of the House. If Nadler loses his primary against
Maloney, Democrats will lose a critical ally of the antitrust fight in
the House, one who holds an extremely important position as chairman of
the House Judiciary Committee. And the next highest-ranking Democrat in
the committee is perhaps the party's most vocal opponent of tackling
Big Tech: Silicon Valley's Zoe Lofgren.

It's unlikely there would be a Big Tech antitrust package without
Nadler. H.R. 3816, the House version of the bill, was introduced by
David Cicilline (D-RI) in the Judiciary Committee in June of last year
with Nadler as a co-sponsor. As the committee chair and highest-ranking
Democrat, Nadler helped steer the bill through a relatively narrow 24-20
vote that featured meaningful Republican support. In the four years
since he assumed the role as top-ranking Democrat in the committee,
Nadler has aggressively pursued antitrust legislation for Big Tech,
while his committee led a two-year investigation of the sector,
primarily overseen by then-Cicilline staffer and now Federal Trade
Commission chair Lina Khan.

One of the most vocal detractors

of the bill, and one of its staunchest no votes, was Lofgren. She told
the

**Prospect**last year that the bill was not "well crafted." After it
passed out of committee, Lofgren teamed up

with California Democrats Eric Swalwell and Lou Correa, and Republicans
Darrell Issa and Tom McClintock, to condemn the package. She has
continued

to push her weaker, industry-friendly bill, the Online Privacy Act, as a
substitute.

Lofgren has received nearly $1 million in employee and PAC contributions
from tech companies over her career, and several former staffers of hers
now work at Silicon Valley firms (like Apple) and associated trade
groups. "Because I represent a district in Santa Clara County, when
staffers leave it's not surprising that they go to represent the tech
world," Lofgren told the

**Prospect**last year.

The American Innovation and Choice Online Act might look very different
if Lofgren, who herself was first elected to Congress in 1994, had
succeeded in her late-2017 campaign for ranking member of the Judiciary
Committee. House Democrats voted

118-72 to elevate Nadler over Lofgren for the position, which was
vacated after Michigan's John Conyers Jr. left Congress following
allegations of sexual misconduct. Because of Nadler's edge in
seniority, he had been serving as acting ranking member since Conyers
stepped down, meaning that there was every expectation that Nadler would
take over the role. But Lofgren made a play for the seat anyway, at a
time when her loyalties to Big Tech were well known. Lofgren was one of
the only Democrats to pressure antitrust authorities to step down in
their investigation of Google during the Obama years.

Since then, the elevation of Nadler over Lofgren has proven hugely
consequential for Democrats' ability to push antitrust legislation and
rein in the monopolistic behavior of Big Tech.

As The Intercept reported

last year just weeks after H.R. 3816 was passed out of committee,
Lofgren chided members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus for
supporting the bill, and noted that she had been generously spreading
all of the money she'd raised from Silicon Valley on Democratic
campaigns that weren't hers since at least 1996. She suggested that
those Democrats who supported the bill didn't understand what they
were voting for. Nadler was among those who spoke up against Lofgren.

And while Lofgren warned Democrats about not biting the hand that feeds,
even substantial support for the legislation from Lofgren's own
district has done little to sway her away from her industry-friendly
stance. According to polling numbers from Data for Progress, conveyed to
The Intercept
,
respondents in Lofgren's deep-blue district support the American
Innovation and Choice Online Act 58 percent to 12 percent, good for a
+46 margin.

If Nadler were to lose to Maloney, Lofgren would likely be a shoo-in for
top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, given the continued
reverence for seniority and her near miss the last time the position
came open. "It would basically put Mark Zuckerberg in charge of
Democratic antitrust policy," said Matt Stoller, director of research at
the American Economic Liberties Project.
Republicans have shown some interest in the antitrust bills, but
Speaker-in-waiting Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), who is rather friendly with
tech leaders
,
would be unlikely to have his party press the issue while in power.
Still, with Lofgren as ranking Democrat, she would be unlikely to make
Republicans pay for their unpopular stance of neglecting Big Tech's
power.

Even with a reinvigorated Federal Trade Commission and Antitrust
Division in the Justice Department, Lofgren helming the House Judiciary
would deal a crucial blow to Democrats' ability to achieve anything
further on antitrust, via legislation or congressional investigation.
That would go back on one of the outstanding commitments of the Biden
administration, and close down one of the few opportunities for
bipartisan accomplishment going forward.

To receive this newsletter directly in your inbox, click here to
subscribe. 

The Case Against Judicial Review

If Democrats don't bring the Supreme Court to heel, Americans will
live under judicial despotism for the foreseeable future. BY RYAN COOPER

Hospital Systems Reverse Reproductive Health Restrictions

The experience of two large systems in Michigan and Missouri speaks to a
larger confusion about the role of hospitals in a post-'Roe' world.
BY JAROD FACUNDO

A Bloody Fourth of July Follows 'Bruen'

The mayor of Philadelphia got grief for his Independence Day remarks
about gun violence. But on the Supreme Court's gun ruling, he is not
wrong. BY GABRIELLE GURLEY

A Watergate Investigator Assesses the January 6th Inquiry

Wayne Stiles, one of the last living agents who worked on the Watergate
break-in, sees reticence from the Justice Department to delve deeply
into the Capitol Riot. BY DANIEL BOGUSLAW

 

Click to Share this Newsletter

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

YOUR TAX DEDUCTIBLE DONATION SUPPORTS INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM

The American Prospect, Inc.
1225 I Street NW, Suite 600
Washington, DC xxxxxx
United States
Copyright (c) 2022 The American Prospect. All rights reserved.

To opt out of American Prospect membership messaging, click here
.

To manage your newsletter preferences, click here
.

To unsubscribe from all American Prospect emails, including newsletters,
click here
.